I pick these:
1969 Mustang Boss 302
1969 Chevelle SS 396 aka "Black Belt"
1972 Baracuda 383
1966 GTO
1966 Corvette
1969 Mustang Boss 302
1969 Chevelle SS 396 aka "Black Belt"
1972 Baracuda 383
1966 GTO
1966 Corvette
I would have to go with:Joeychgo said:I pick these:
1969 Mustang Boss 302
1969 Chevelle SS 396 aka "Black Belt"
1972 Baracuda 383
1966 GTO
1966 Corvette
BlackIceLSC said:I would have to go with the following, in no particular order:
1970 Plymouth Hemi 'Cuda convertible
1969 Plymouth Roadrunner 440-6pack(or Hemi!!!)
1970 Plymouth 'Cuda 440-6pack(or Hemi!!!)
1968 1/2 Mustang GT (428 CJ)
1967 Shelby GT-500(w/early 427)
1964 Ford Thunderbolt
1968 Hemi Dart
1969 Corvette 427/435 tri-power roadster
1967 Dodge Coronet Convt w/Hemi
1968 Chevy Camaro RS/SS 396 Convert.(drove one once-liked it)
and all time "dream machine"
1969 Mustang Boss 429(a raven Black one!!!)
Man Jibit, we are on the same page there. I almost bought a blue one from the Volo museum in Illinois 2 years ago. My favorite car. Something they did during the body off restoration scared my off. Still looking for another one though. I would love to send it to that show where they steal the guy's car and totally redo it in 1 week. Those guys are crazy and their cars are incredible works of art.Jibit said:My all time favorite is the 1970 Olds 442 Convertible with the Hurst package.
Jibit said:My all time favorite is the 1970 Olds 442 Convertible with the Hurst package.
Spidar6996 said:1969 Yenko 427 Camaro
1966 GTO
1971 Cuda
1965 Vett 396
1968 Pontiac GTO "Judge"
JohnnyBz00LS said:You are referring to the Hurst shifter (4-spd) or Hurst dual-gate (AT), correct?I was referring to the Hurst dual-gate, I guess I was a little misleading when I said Hurst package. I like that year because I like the front end with the headlight together and it still had the 455 in it. If I'm not mistaken, the HP started to decrease in the 442 after '70. Or maybe they were just rated less by Oldsmobile. I've heard tales that the manufacturers claimed less HP back then so that insurance wasn't as expensive.
Jibit said:JohnnyBz00LS said:You are referring to the Hurst shifter (4-spd) or Hurst dual-gate (AT), correct?I was referring to the Hurst dual-gate, I guess I was a little misleading when I said Hurst package. I like that year because I like the front end with the headlight together and it still had the 455 in it. If I'm not mistaken, the HP started to decrease in the 442 after '70. Or maybe they were just rated less by Oldsmobile. I've heard tales that the manufacturers claimed less HP back then so that insurance wasn't as expensive.
Yep, other than the H/O and Yenko / COPO cars, '70 was the 1st year GM allowed an engine w/ greater than 400 ci into an A-body. In '71, GM dropped compression ratios in all their engines to meet emissions, and HP dropped accordingly (some Ford and Mopar engines retained the higher CRs / HP into '71). In '72, the "net HP" rating (vs. "gross HP" rating) standards went into effect, so the same engine in '71-'72 had lower HP ratings in '72. So 1970 stands as the one year where HP peaked for many GM cars. And yes, many engines were under-rated by the factory for insurance reasons, but this practice started in the mid-late '60s (the Chevy L88 and Shelby Cobra 427 comes to mind). I've seen articles that contained "proof" that the W31 and W30 Olds engines were under-rated as well. The Chevy and Ford 302 ci engines used in the Z28 and Boss 302s (both rated at 290HP) were also under-rated, but that may have been driven more by their participation in Trans Am racing than insurance reasons. Even today, some engines are under-rated (f-body LS1s and '03+ S/C Cobra engines). Remember in '99, SVT learned a hard lesson to NOT over-rate their engine output. It's better to be conservative.
hintsclue said:Only one I can think of--1969 ZL1 COPO Camaro