Anatomy of a smear...

shagdrum

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
6,568
Reaction score
44
Location
KS
The Race Card, Football and Me
My critics would have you believe no conservative meets NFL 'standards.'

By RUSH LIMBAUGH

David Checketts, an investor and owner of sports teams, approached me in late May about investing in the St. Louis Rams football franchise. As a football fan, I was intrigued. I invited him to my home where we discussed it further. Even after informing him that some people might try to make an issue of my participation, Mr. Checketts said he didn't much care. I accepted his offer.

It didn't take long before my name was selectively leaked to the media as part of the Checketts investment group. Shortly thereafter, the media elicited comments from the likes of Al Sharpton. In 1998 Mr. Sharpton was found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay $65,000 for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley case. He also played a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot (he called neighborhood Jews "diamond merchants") and 1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot.

Not to be outdone, Jesse Jackson, whose history includes anti-Semitic speech (in 1984 he referred to Jews as "Hymies" and to New York City as "Hymietown" in a Washington Post interview) chimed in. He found me unfit to be associated with the NFL. I was too divisive and worse. I was accused of once supporting slavery and having praised Martin Luther King Jr.'s murderer, James Earl Ray.

Next came writers in the sports world, like the Washington Post's Michael Wilbon. He wrote this gem earlier this week: "I'm not going to try and give specific examples of things Limbaugh has said over the years because I screwed up already doing that, repeating a quote attributed to Limbaugh (about slavery) which he has told me he simply did not say and does not reflect his feelings. I take him at his word. . . . "

Mr. Wilbon wasn't alone. Numerous sportswriters, CNN, MSNBC, among others, falsely attributed to me statements I had never made. Their sources, as best I can tell, were Wikipedia and each other. But the Wikipedia post was based on a fabrication printed in a book that also lacked any citation to an actual source.

I never said I supported slavery and I never praised James Earl Ray. How sick would that be? Just as sick as those who would use such outrageous slanders against me or anyone else who never even thought such things. Mr. Wilbon refuses to take responsibility for his poison pen, writing instead that he will take my word that I did not make these statements; others, like Rick Sanchez of CNN, essentially used the same sleight-of-hand.

The sports media elicited comments from a handful of players, none of whom I can recall ever meeting. Among other things, at least one said he would never play for a team I was involved in given my racial views. My racial views? You mean, my belief in a colorblind society where every individual is treated as a precious human being without regard to his race? Where football players should earn as much as they can and keep as much as they can, regardless of race? Those controversial racial views?

The NFL players union boss, DeMaurice Smith, jumped in. A Washington criminal defense lawyer, Democratic Party supporter and Barack Obama donor, he sent a much publicized email to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell saying that it was important for the league to reject discrimination and hatred.

When Mr. Goodell was asked about me, he suggested that my 2003 comment criticizing the media's coverage of Donovan McNabb—in which I said the media was cheerleading Mr. McNabb because they wanted a successful black quarterback—fell short of the NFL's "high standard." High standard? Half a decade later, the media would behave the same way about the presidential candidacy of Mr. Obama.

Having brought me into his group, Mr. Checketts now wanted a way out. He asked me to resign. I told him no way. I had done nothing wrong. I had not uttered the words these people were putting in my mouth. And I would not bow to their libels and pressure. He would have to drop me from the group. A few days later, he did.

As I explained on my radio show, this spectacle is bigger than I am on several levels. There is a contempt in the news business, including the sportswriter community, for conservatives that reflects the blind hatred espoused by Messrs. Sharpton and Jackson. "Racism" is too often their sledgehammer. And it is being used to try to keep citizens who don't share the left's agenda from participating in the full array of opportunities this nation otherwise affords each of us. It was on display many years ago in an effort to smear Clarence Thomas with racist stereotypes and keep him off the Supreme Court. More recently, it was employed against patriotic citizens who attended town-hall meetings and tea-party protests.

These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.
 
Most American find you to be disgusting, Mr. Limbaugh. Deal with it.
 
With his Crips and Bloods comments Rush broke the unspoken rule about not bringing up race in professional football and showed his unsuitability to being an owner.
 
With his Crips and Bloods comments Rush broke the unspoken rule about not bringing bringing up race in professional football and showed his unsuitability to being an owner.

Apparently you are utterly ignorant of the context of what he was saying...
 
With his Crips and Bloods comments Rush broke the unspoken rule about not bringing bringing up race in professional football and showed his unsuitability to being an owner.

As mentioned, it was a completely appropriate program addressing the thug behavior exhibited during a tsunami of stories regarding NFL players fighting dogs, beating women, discharging firearms, crashing vehicles, and fights.

But why is it an "unspoken rule?"
Is it too soon to discuss race or social problems in this country still?


Personal, Al Sharpton's ridiculous threat of law suit against Limbaugh now is funny.
Sharpton is a disgusting sub-human. He's been sanitized for the media in recent years, he's a bit of a ministrel show now. But if you lived in New York in the late 80s and early 90s, you'd understand just what a degenerate scum bag he is.
 
But why is it an "unspoken rule?"
Is it too soon to discuss race or social problems in this country still?

Sports is entertainment where we're supposed to put aside the usual sins of life in the spirit of pure competition.
Rush has made himself a public figure and his commentary about the NFL is perfectly fine for him in his capacity
but as an owner he would take away from the spirit and purpose of the game.
We "play" sports as a feel good thing.
Rush's profile would risk spoiling the game by diverting attention to him.
 
Sports is entertainment where we're supposed to put aside the usual sins of life in the spirit of pure competition.
Sports is entertainment.
When the participants in this lucrative field designed solely for the purpose of entertaining are acting like criminals and are treated as role models, then it's essential that you examine it. Without being censored by sensitivity.

but as an owner he would take away from the spirit and purpose of the game.
That absurd. The man is passionate about the game and he wouldn't even have had any kind of controlling stake or presence in the game. He was merely an investor.

What's offensive here is the double standard being applied.
High profile conservatives need not invest in this game, or at least enemies of Obama, because they'll be smeared, lied about, and attacked with one of the culturally and political charged smear available...racist.

We "play" sports as a feel good thing.

Rush's profile would risk spoiling the game by diverting attention to him.
I disagree.
The only thing that would "spoil" the game would be opportunistic political hacks who use the game as a means of punishing and intimidating those they don't agree with.

Had no one mentioned it, you'd have never known that Limbaugh was a part owner. Just like you aren't aware of the names of all the offensive left-wing minority stake owners or applicants.
 
Following Limbaugh, conservative media push baseless charge that Obama administration helped kill his Rams bid.

http://mediamatters.org/research/200910190003

Did MediaMatters dispute the "baseless" charge, or just call it baseless and then change the subject going directly into "ridicule" mode.

Crazy, radical, right-winger Juan Williams even mentioned it.-
that was sarcastic.

NFL Players Association Executive Director DeMaurice Smith served as counsel to Attorney General Eric Holder and was a member of Barack Obama’s transition team. Smith was a vocal opponent to Limbaughs bid and circulated an e-mail to organize the opposition to it.

From ESPN.com:
NFL Players executive director DeMaurice Smith on Saturday made a move to solidify the union against a bid by conservative talk show radio host Rush Limbaugh as part of a group that aims to purchase the St. Louis Rams.

In an e-mail to the union's executive committee on Saturday specifically addressing Limbaugh's bid, Smith said, "I've spoken to the Commissioner [Roger Goodell] and I understand that this ownership consideration is in the early stages. But sport in America is at its best when it unifies, gives all of us reason to cheer, and when it transcends. Our sport does exactly that when it overcomes division and rejects discrimination and hatred."
 
Apparently you are utterly ignorant of the context of what he was saying...

you can find the transcript on Rush's site...

And it is hard to tell what the 'context' was - the transcript shows "break" on either side of this quote...

Look it, let me put it to you this way. The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

He also used crips and bloods again this year...

Ladies and gentlemen, I was fortunate yesterday: I had the privilege of treading the hallowed ground at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, where the Pittsburgh Steelers at least maintained sanity in an NFL season as a home team winning a playoff game. Go Steelers! They're up next against the Crips and the Bloods, the Baltimore Ravens next Sunday at 6:30 in Pittsburgh at Heinz Field.

Maybe if he really wanted to own a team, he might want to not compare teams in the NFL to black gangs. Especially since the majority of the players in the NFL are black.
 
you can find the transcript on Rush's site...

And it is hard to tell what the 'context' was - the transcript shows "break" on either side of this quote...

Actually, when you read the transcript, it is rather clear what he is responding to and what the context is. More of that famous Foxpaws intellectual dishonesty on display...
 
Actually, when you read the transcript, it is rather clear what he is responding to and what the context is. More of that famous Foxpaws intellectual dishonesty on display...

And more of that famous shag 'avoid the issue' mentality on display...

So, shag - what is he responding too - and why would he specifically use bloods and crips in both instances? Isn't he stereotyping?
 
If the Obama administration is as powerful as Limbaugh claims, maybe they should turn the switch off on the golden EIB microphone.

Limbaugh was forced out by his fellow investors, not the NFL. The NFL, its coaches and its players had the RIGHT to voice their opinions regarding having this man who referred to the players as the "Cripes and the Bloods." He's been spewing this racist nonsense for years . . . the chickens came home to roost and his over-inflated EGO won't let him accept the blame for this OWN actions.

Let Rush pay for his own racism and lack of restraint. The only person to blame for him not being able to achieve his dream is HIM and his big mouth.

http://mediamatters.org/research/200910190003#comments
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top