Ann Coulter, the Dems, Iraq and France

MonsterMark

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
9,225
Reaction score
3
Location
United States
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi

Boy does Anny hit the nail on the head.

If only we could ship our liberal terrorist loving friends here in the U.S. over to the Middle East and take back in return the good people of the Middle Eeast that want peace and freedom, all would be great with the U.S. Even exchange = great idea.
 
What'd she hit it with, her penis? Nothing more than angry "THE DEMOCRATS DID IT ALL; THEY'RE TO BLAME!" rants.
 
Hummm.

Let's see. France, of all countries just has an election and guess what? They elect a pro-America, (read- Pro Bush) candidate! Maybe the people of France are getting a clue just as our liberal friends in the U.S. are losing it. A conservative gets elected in France and the media doesn't say a word. LMAO.

Of course, had the liberal woman, (read -Hillary clone) been elected, you can bet the media would have already annointed Hillary based on the French elections.

Just pointing out more liberal hypocrisy.
 
Hummm.

Let's see. France, of all countries just has an election and guess what? They elect a pro-America, (read- Pro Bush) candidate! Maybe the people of France are getting a clue just as our liberal friends in the U.S. are losing it. A conservative gets elected in France and the media doesn't say a word. LMAO.

Of course, had the liberal woman, (read -Hillary clone) been elected, you can bet the media would have already annointed Hillary based on the French elections.

Just pointing out more liberal hypocrisy.

Sarkozy is more conservative than Chirac and he does propose a more "American/British" strategy for France's economy; only in your world does "pro-America" = "pro-Bush" though.
 
liberal terrorist loving friends


And people accuse me of being a bush hater.... Geeze. Nothing like denigrating American citizens only because they have a differing viewpoint. I dont know of any "liberals" that are "terrorist loving"
 
And people accuse me of being a bush hater.... Geeze. Nothing like denigrating American citizens only because they have a differing viewpoint. I dont know of any "liberals" that are "terrorist loving"

How about terrorist supporting, defending, and enabling?
 
The list goes on and on. Recent examples, the retreat in defeat tactics in Iraq, or the Democrats reluctance to pass protections so that people who notify authorities of suspicious activity can't be sued.

Nice ownage with those links.;)

I love to hear liberals cry how Bush is taking away our freedoms when it is exactly the opposite. When another and much larger and more damaging attack happens to our Country, watch how fast the liberals will move to take away our freedoms.
 
Yeah well, things can be spun one way or the other. -- Kinda like how GW misled the country to get us into a war. See, thats spin as well as accurate.
 
Yeah well, things can be spun one way or the other. -- Kinda like how GW misled the country to get us into a war. See, thats spin as well as accurate.

...do you actually believe this? Is it necessary to go through this again? I'd pick apart your idiotic statement about Bush, but that's not what the thread is about.

But, in essence, you are agreeing. The Democrats and their liberal support are the terrorist supporting, defending, and enabling group- you just wish I'd "spun" it in a more flattering way.

Glad we're in agreement.
 
What soothsayer do you know of that says Hillary can beat any of the likely Republican nominees?

It was a joke...It was aimed at Monster's "Ahhh, the end is near if a Dem takes office, ahhh!" attitude. You didn't really think I believed in magical predictions did you?

Honestly though I think she'd have a decent chance... [IMO] The sway voters will vote more for a (any) Dem than a (any) Rep this coming election; I know you blame the "Liberal MSM" and not Bush and Co.'s actions these last 7 or so years.
 
Honestly though I think she'd have a decent chance... [IMO] The sway voters will vote more for a (any) Dem than a (any) Rep this coming election; I know you blame the "Liberal MSM" and not Bush and Co.'s actions these last 7 or so years.

If you still can't see how much differently someone like Romney is treated compared with Obama, you're blind.

Right now, the "swing" vote is motivated by name recognition. Come next year, either Hillary or Obama will absolutely be trounced in a debate against someone like Mitt Romney, Gulliani, McCain, Fred Thompson, or Duncan Hunter.

The Republican field is extremely strong, though it would seem that the press is intent upon convincing us to the contrary. The Democrats are running to ineffective junior senators that have to pander to George Sorros.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top