BREAKING: Iraqi al Qaeda planning U.S. Attacks

Calabrio

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
8,793
Reaction score
3
Location
Sarasota
ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/US/print?id=2813235

Details Emerge About Possible Terror Threat
Suspects, Reportedly Tied to Al Qaeda in Iraq, Sought Student Visas
By PIERRE THOMAS

WASHINGTON, Jan. 22, 2007 — - Mimicking the hijackers who executed the Sept. 11 attacks, insurgents reportedly tied to al Qaeda in Iraq considered using student visas to slip terrorists into the United States to orchestrate a new attack on American soil.

Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, recently testified that documents captured by coalition forces during a raid of a safe house believed to house Iraqi members of al Qaeda six months ago "revealed [AQI] was planning terrorist operations in the U.S."

At the time, Maples offered little additional insight into the possible terror plot. ABC News, however, has learned new details of what remains a classified incident that has been dealt with at the highest levels of government.

Watch "World News with Charles Gibson."

Sources tell ABC News that the plot may have involved moving between 10 and 20 suspects believed to be affiliated with al Qaeda in Iraq into the United States with student visas -- the same method used by the 19 al Qaeda terrorists who struck American targets on Sept. 11.

U.S. officials now require universities to closely track foreign nationals who use student visas to study in the United States. University officials must report international students who fail to arrive on campus or miss class regularly.

In August, the FBI and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement alerted intelligence agencies and state and local law enforcement about 11 Egyptian students who had failed to report to their classes at Montana State University. The students were ultimately apprehended.

Still, despite the heightened precautions, some security analysts fear that skilled terrorists -- handpicked because of their clean records and because they are carefully trained -- could still slip through an academic setting.

The plot was discovered six months ago, roughly the same time that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, was killed by coalition forces. Sources tell ABC News that the suspects involved in the effort to launch the U.S. attack were closely associated with Zarqawi.

The plan also came only months after Ayman al-Zawahiri, al Qaeda's No. 2, had requested that Zarqawi attempt an attack inside the United States.

"This appears to be the first hard evidence al Qaeda in Iraq was trying to attack us here at home," said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, former chief counterterrorism adviser on the U.S. National Security Council.

The plan was uncovered in its early stages, and sources say there is no indication that the suspects made it into the United States. Officials also emphasize that there is no evidence of an imminent attack.

The hunt for suspects continues, however, and some fear that al Qaeda recruits in Iraq could be easily redirected.

"Anyone willing to go to Iraq to fight American troops is probably willing to try to come to the United States," Clarke said.

Copyright © 2007 ABC News Internet Ventures
 
WTF?? I thought that TommyB said that we aren't fighting Al Qaeda over in Iraq! Now wait a minute! This must be some right wing propaganda site designed to prop up Bush's failing poll numbers in a weakassed attempt to continue fighting his daddy's war that he lied to get us into!

Ok, sarcasm off. On a more serious note, isn't it interesting how well we are able to prevent terrorist attacks on our soil now that THE GORELICK WALL ERECTED BY CLINTON (no pun intended) is NO LONGER IN PLACE?!?
 
fossten said:
WTF?? I thought that TommyB said that we aren't fighting Al Qaeda over in Iraq! Now wait a minute! This must be some right wing propaganda site designed to prop up Bush's failing poll numbers in a weakassed attempt to continue fighting his daddy's war that he lied to get us into!
How does this contradict anything I said? If anything, it contradicts your own assertation that fighting them "over there" somehow kept us from having to fight them "over here". To quote you...
It has, however, rendered them less effective since they are having to devote more and more money and manpower over there rather than attack us on our homeland.
It seems that they still have the willingness to take the battle to us.

fossten said:
Ok, sarcasm off. On a more serious note, isn't it interesting how well we are able to prevent terrorist attacks on our soil now that THE GORELICK WALL ERECTED BY CLINTON (no pun intended) is NO LONGER IN PLACE?!?
You just keep pulling these right-wing myths out of your ass, no matter how many times they've been debunked. What's next, are you gonna post the "Clinton Death List" for us again? That one's always a knee-slapper.

There was no such thing as the so-called "Gorelick Wall" as defined by your right-wing pundits. Former Republican senator Slade Gordon summed it up quite clearly:

Additionally, the assertion that the commission failed to report on this program to protect Ms. Gorelick is ridiculous. She had nothing to do with any "wall" between law enforcement and our intelligence agencies. The 1995 Department of Justice guidelines at issue were internal to the Justice Department and were not even sent to any other agency. The guidelines had no effect on the Department of Defense and certainly did not prohibit it from communicating with the FBI, the CIA or anyone else.

Congress created the walls that were in place before September 11 -- such as the National Security Act's prohibition on U.S. intelligence agency spying on Americans and the Posse Comitatus Act -- that have nothing to do with the Department of Justice memo. The Defense Department's own directives on sharing such information date from the 1980s. It is not clear that those laws would have prohibited sharing information in this instance.

The fact is that the Justice Department guidelines sought to encourage sharing in a way that was consistent with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA. FISA enabled the government to conduct surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes under a lesser standard than typical criminal surveillance. To keep this power in check, the courts prohibited the use of intelligence wiretaps unless their "primary purpose" was intelligence gathering rather than criminal prosecution.

Then-Attorney General John Ashcroft's department reissued and reaffirmed those guidelines in 2001, before September 11.
 
TommyB said:
How does this contradict anything I said? If anything, it contradicts your own assertation that fighting them "over there" somehow kept us from having to fight them "over here". To quote you...
It seems that they still have the willingness to take the battle to us.

You just keep pulling these right-wing myths out of your ass, no matter how many times they've been debunked. What's next, are you gonna post the "Clinton Death List" for us again? That one's always a knee-slapper.

There was no such thing as the so-called "Gorelick Wall" as defined by your right-wing pundits. Former Republican senator Slade Gordon summed it up quite clearly:

You're soooooo easy TommyB...:rolleyes:
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top