CNN stung by fake atrocity video?

shagdrum

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
6,568
Reaction score
44
Location
KS
Here is the story. No double checking or independent verification. Basically, no journalistic standards here. Simply repeating of staged propaganda here by "the most trusted name in news". Is this simply CNN giving their audience what they want, or stoking anti-Israeli fires?

I saw this segment earlier on CNN and wondered at the time how easily this could have been faked. Pretty darned easily, as LGF discovered, and the questions start where the fakery seems most obvious:
YouTube - Gaza CNN : Cameraman captures death of younger brother
The story was supposedly that a freelance journalist in Gaza returned home to find his younger brother dead, the victim of a missile attack on a residential rooftop from an unmanned IDF drone. The video shows the supposed scene of the attack, and follows the Gaza family from the hospital to the burial, after a heroic attempt by doctors to revive the young child.

Only, when you look at the supposedly heroic effort, it lacks one thing: any sense that the two doctors are actually performing CPR with any effort at all. They stop as though they’ve scripted out the moment. That’s when I questioned whether the scene could have been faked, and at LGF, a physician called shenanigans:
I’m no military expert, but I am a doctor, and this video is bullsh-t. The chest compressions that were being performed at the beginning of this video were absolutely, positively fake. The large man in the white coat was NOT performing CPR on that child. He was just sort of tapping on the child’s sternum a little bit with his fingers. You can’t make blood flow like that. Furthermore, there’s no point in doing chest compressions if you’re not also ventilating the patient somehow. In this video, I can’t tell for sure if the patient has an endotracheal tube in place, but you can see that there is nobody bag-ventilating him (a bag is actually hanging by the head of the bed), and there is no ventilator attached to the patient. In a hospital, during a code on a ventilated patient, somebody would probably be bagging the patient during the chest compressions. And they also would have moved the bed away from the wall, so that somebody could get back there to intubate the patient and/or bag him. In short, the “resuscitation scene” at the beginning is fake, and it’s a pretty lame fake at that.
A little more investigation determined that one of the doctors in the video is notorious terrorist apologist Mads Gilbert. The older brother, meanwhile, is no mere “free-lance cameraman” but the owner of a business that hosts Internet web sites for Hamas. In other words, this looks an awful attempt at propaganda that only a “professional” media outlet with a pre-existing animus to Israel would put on the air without any checking of sources.

CNN has pulled the video from its rotation and its web site, without any explanation or retraction. We’ll see if they own up to their mistake, or simply hope no one notices.

Can you say "media double standard"?
 
I don't trust CNN any farther than I can throw them, but part of the problem is that the Israelis aren't allowing foreign journalists into Gaza, at least according to NPR:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99108802

Would you allow them to come with you?
The imbeded troops can be an effective PR tool, but in this case, when they are SO committed to attacking the Israelis, they have little to gain. They are a security risk, and they have the ability to create even more damaging propaganda.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They're not talking about embedded journalists--the journalists are being denied entry to Gaza, period. They may not do their jobs competently, but if they can't get in to see for themselves, it's only possible to get one side of the story. And it's not like they're unbiased enough to keep from reporting just that side. (At least NPR is straight up in reporting that they can't tell you both sides.)
 
They're not talking about embedded journalists--the journalists are being denied entry to Gaza, period. They may not do their jobs competently, but if they can't get in to see for themselves, it's only possible to get one side of the story. And it's not like they're unbiased enough to keep from reporting just that side. (At least NPR is straight up in reporting that they can't tell you both sides.)

Same thing applies.
The journalists are lazy and they have an agenda.
Furthermore, what happens when a journalist who's embedded with Hamas is blown up by an Israeli rocket? Additionally, embedding can have the ability to make the journalist more sympathetic to the cause, especially when they are predisposed to that. Make no mistake, these terrorist groups are sophisticated and know how to manipulate media.

It's a lose/lose for the Israelis.
 
"Lack of media access" of any sort doesn't, in any way, excuse the shear sloppiness of the reporting here on CNN. A few more key points...
  • Take a look at the blood on the operating table. For penetrating wounds, there is almost no blood, and what little there is looks washed out — almost orange. The body should have been covered in blood, and much more than that should have transferred to the sheets, especially if someone was giving CPR.
  • The video alleges that the Israelis used a missile from an unmanned drone to attack the rooftop, but look carefully at that roof. A missile hitting that roof would have left much more than a six-inch-diameter impact crater, even if it didn’t explode.
  • Also, the plastic chair is sitting normally in the blast zone, and the clothes remain on the clothesline in the background. A missile blast that killed two boys on that roof would have done much more extensive damage.
Apparently, CNN has put the video back up on their website and given this explaination, which bases a good part of it's argument on an inverse ad hominem fallacy;
"He's [Mashharawi] a man of enormous integrity and would never get involved with any sort of manipulation of images, let alone when the person dying is his own brother," Martin said. "I know the whole family. I know them very well. ... [Mashharawi] is upset and angry that anyone would think of him having done anything like this. ... This is ridiculous. He's independent."

This blog has a lot more info and research on this as well, and why the CNN "response" is an absolute joke.

While the issue of lack of media access may be a legitimate point in a broader argument (which is where I think you were going), it has nothing to to with the shear incompetence on the part of CNN in reporting this, and only serves as a red herring in that discussion.

This video is a prime example of the hypocritical double standard in coverage by the MSM. If a story fits the narative in the MSM (dictated by their political agenda and social view), then that story is true unless and until it is proven false; and any dishonest and deceptive arguments to defend the story are justifed (smearing of sources, mischaracterization, moving the goalposts, etc...).

On the other hand, any story that goes against that same narrative promoted by the MSM is false until proven true, and any dishonest and deceptive arguments to discredit the story are justifed.

It is clear that the MSM doesn't function as a sort of "independent guardian of our liberties"; a role that they are constitutionally given and protected as. Instead, today (and for at least the past 50 years) they are effectively the propaganda wing for liberalism and the democratic party.
 
"Lack of media access" of any sort doesn't, in any way, excuse the shear sloppiness of the reporting here on CNN.
Not at all. It also doesn't excuse any of the other questionable editorial decisions they've made over the years.
 
Anyone else remember this masterful piece of journalism from the AFP?
bullets8-07.jpg


Of course, that was only anti-American propaganda, but I think it demonstrates the credibility and integrity of the international press corps.
 
Anyone else remember this masterful piece of journalism from the AFP?
bullets8-07.jpg


Of course, that was only anti-American propaganda, but I think it demonstrates the credibility and integrity of the international press corps.

what....did somebody drop those bullets on her house, they haven't been fired:D
 
I'm amazed at the utter laziness (or is it stupidity?) of Pallywood videos, I read/watched up on them a few years ago where they used the same 'crying female victim' in three different videos.
 
I'm amazed at the utter laziness (or is it stupidity?) of Pallywood videos, I read/watched up on them a few years ago where they used the same 'crying female victim' in three different videos.

I'm less amazed at the utter laziness (or is it stupidity) of the International media WHO REPEATEDLY ACCEPT there propaganda as truth and then using the perceived credibility of AFB, BBC, ABC, AP, then report it to the world as fact.
 
The one on the left seems to be a .223 cartridge. Is the right one a hunting calibre? In any case, as you said, they are cartridges, not bullets. Somebody must have thrown a handful. :rolleyes:
KS
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top