Democrat State Senator Page Scandal, Media Ignores

fossten

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
6
Location
Louisville
S.D. Senator Denies Groping Accusation
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Jan24/0,4670,SDPageScandal,00.html

By CHET BROKAW, Associated Press Writer

PIERRE, S.D. — A state senator accused of groping a legislative page testified Wednesday that the 18-year-old was like a relative, that he saw nothing wrong with sharing a motel bed with him and that the teenager fabricated his accusation.

The Senate has accused Sen. Dan Sutton of sexual misconduct last February with the page. Sutton was questioned Wednesday before a Senate special committee investigating the accusation.

Asked whether he thought it was appropriate to climb into bed with Austin Wiese, Sutton responded that the page "was like a nephew or a son to me and my wife. I had no concern."

And that's where it ended, Sutton said.

"I didn't do anything," he said twice.

While it is The Associated Press' policy not to identify people who say they are the victims of sexual assault, Wiese's name was used in the Senate committee's public hearing, which was carried live on the Internet, and has been circulated by other media in the state.

Wiese, now 19, was not present for Sutton's testimony.

Wiese told the Senate committee on Tuesday that Sutton touched his genitals on the motel bed. The alleged incident took place as Wiese was starting a stint as a page for the 2006 Legislature.

Sutton said Wiese made it up _ possibly because of his father's political ambitions or a failed business venture. Wiese's father, Dennis Wiese, lost the Democratic nomination for governor last year.

A woman who answered the telephone at Dennis Wiese's home Wednesday night said that he was not there and that she did not know how to reach him.

Sutton testified that his family and Wiese's family had been friends for years. He said that after talking with Wiese's parents, he told Austin Wiese he could stay with him in his motel room, where there was a bed and a sofa bed.

On Feb. 5, the two watched the Super Bowl and worked out, and Wiese climbed into the bed, Sutton testified. Sutton said he did not pull out the sofa bed because Wiese already was asleep.

Sutton, a Democrat from Flandreau, could be censured, disciplined or expelled when the full Senate votes. The vote is expected Jan. 31.

Notice how the party affiliation is mentioned on the LAST LINE OF THE ARTICLE. Wonder why that is?

Contrast with this New York Times article from September:


Lawmaker Quits Over E-Mail Sent To Teenage Pages
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstr...Reference/Times Topics/People/F/Foley, Mark A

September 30, 2006, Saturday
By KATE ZERNIKE AND ABBY GOODNOUGH (NYT); National Desk

In six terms representing a wealthy swath of southern Florida, Representative Mark Foley, a Republican, became well known for his ardent efforts to safeguard the young and vulnerable, leading the House caucus on missing and exploited children and championing laws against sexual predators. On Friday, Mr. Foley resigned abruptly ...
[snip]

No media bias my a$$.:mad:
 
Dude, he's a STATE senator from South Dakota. The only people who would remotely care are South Dakotans.
 
TommyB said:
Dude, he's a STATE senator from South Dakota. The only people who would remotely care are South Dakotans.

First of all, the fact that you don't care about an elected government official making sexual advances on a page just shows how calloused and intellectually dishonest you are. You are now saying that the only time it "counts" is if it's a United States Congressman.

If it were a Republican, not only would you care, but the media would have listed the party affiliation at the beginning or even in the title of the article.

I'm simply exposing hypocrisy and bias, and you're making excuses.
 
Fossten is right, if this were a Republican scandal it would be reported differently.

First, his party identification would be in the first sentence, or in the title.
"REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN INVOLVED IN DIRTY SEX PERVERT HYPOCRISY STUFF"

And, it goes without saying, they would play up the Tom Foley story and draw a connection. Then, usually, they try to expand the story to associate as many other Republicans with the offender to expand the story and undermine the party.

Usually you can tell what party the crooked politician is by reading the story. If it tells you in the first paragraph, he's obviously a Republican. But if they only mention it in the last paragraph, or omit it all together, then he's a Democrat.
 
fossten said:
Yes, it's true!!!

The Republican Vice-President's daughter is a lesbian. And not only that, she is now pregnant! That must make her a relative of Mary, you know, the mother of God. Immaculate conception and all that.

You should stay better informed.
 
MonsterMark said:
Yes, it's true!!!

The Republican Vice-President's daughter is a lesbian. And not only that, she is now pregnant! That must make her a relative of Mary, you know, the mother of God. Immaculate conception and all that.

You should stay better informed.

Dang. And to think I just learned last week that John Kerry served in Vietnam.
 
fossten said:
Dang. And to think I just learned last week that John Kerry served in Vietnam.
And now I'm told...Obama (not to be confused with Osama) is not only BLACK, he is a Christian Muslim! Wow! And Hollywood loves him. I think they are going to make a movie about him he is so famous.
 
MonsterMark said:
And now I'm told...Obama (not to be confused with Osama) is not only BLACK, he is a Christian Muslim! Wow! And Hollywood loves him. I think they are going to make a movie about him he is so famous.

First of all, Obama is a Halfrican American. He's not black in the sense that Al Sharpton defines black, that is descended from slaves. He is descended from an immigrant muslim.

Second, a Christian Muslim is about as oxymoronic as an honest liberal.
 
fossten said:
First of all, Obama is a Halfrican American. He's not black in the sense that Al Sharpton defines black, that is descended from slaves. He is descended from an immigrant muslim.

Second, a Christian Muslim is about as oxymoronic as an honest liberal.

In fairness, I haven't read anything reliable that says he's every practiced the religion of Islam. To perpetuate the claim despite the lack of anything to support it undermines the everyone's credibility.

What he is is far worse, he's a far-left guy successfully disguising himself as a centrist. He has the media gushing over him too. Hopefully he peaked too soon. Otherwise, Hillary's goons are going to work him over in the public.
 
Hey,

I'd just like to note, when the articles of Mark Foley were first introduced by Fox News, they mistakenly reported him as a Democrat. This happened on three separate occasions, and Fox has yet to apologize or even admit the mistake in the first place. Bias goes both ways. In an ideal world, the party of a criminal would not be reported, simply because it is irrelevant. What one "member" of a party does, in no way, represents the party as a whole. News in general has strayed from its original purpose: to inform. Like anything else today, it is a business.

Unfortunately, negative sells more papers and gets more viewers than positive.
 
TheBigL'sLS said:
Hey,

I'd just like to note, when the articles of Mark Foley were first introduced by Fox News, they mistakenly reported him as a Democrat. This happened on three separate occasions, and Fox has yet to apologize or even admit the mistake in the first place. Bias goes both ways. In an ideal world, the party of a criminal would not be reported, simply because it is irrelevant. What one "member" of a party does, in no way, represents the party as a whole. News in general has strayed from its original purpose: to inform. Like anything else today, it is a business.

Unfortunately, negative sells more papers and gets more viewers than positive.

I would relish the opportunity to go thru life totally naive. What bliss it would be.:slap:
 
fossten said:
No media bias my a$$.:mad:

100306b.jpg


Yea... I guess it could have been a simply honest mistake that was accidentally repeated three times.
 
...I hate to be the one to tell you this, but the news networks screw up the party on those crylons all of the time. It's one of the problems associated with having a 24hour news cycle like this. Often times, no one cares, in this case, those as.shats over at mediamatters seized on it to make a point.

What that point is isn't exactly clear? This was a huge story, is the implication that they were trying to "trick" people into thinking he was a Democrat? Does that really sound believable to you? This was a story being pushed very heavily and his party affiliation in connection with the midterm elections was part of t he angle. To make this mistake serves no purpose but to embarrass the network. It's just silly to try to argue otherwise.

As for the purpose of "news"- It's not that it's strayed so much from it's purpose, the problem is that a bunch of self-important, agenda driven twits moved into the industry and changed the way it was viewed. The notion that journalists were supposed to be impartial is a 20th century idea- interestingly enough, advanced by incredibly partial journalists, disguising their bias.

For the record, if you watch the news networks you will see that while Fox personalities lean right, their NEWS division leans a little to the left. This is in contrast to CNN and MSNBC and PBS who have news that leans FAR LEFT and personalities that lean FAR LEFT too, with a token Tucker Carlson through in.

Anyway, the Foley story is an example of a mistake, a mistake that happens all the time. If you watch the news alot, you'll see this kind of mistake, particularly with the hundreds of unknown house members, more often than you'd think.
 
One more thing to note, the mislabeled Foley crylon-

It appeared on one broadcast of the O'Reilly Factor, during a conversation he was having with Ann Coulter. The topic of the conversation was directly addressing the party affiliation of Foley. There was obviously no attempt to trick the public. The short little clip that happened to be replayed during the segment was about 15seconds, maximum, at length, and it didn't have any sound.

And the mistake was fixed before the late night rebroadcast.

I bring this up because the way this "example" of Fox bias is usually mentioned makes the mistake sound much more serious than it really was. In context, it's obviously just a goof by the crylon guy.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top