MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
I'll let you decide. The liberal argument is that tax cuts don't work. That the government takes in less money because we are giving money to the rich.
Anybody on the Left care to refute these figures? I have the popcorn and sodi-pop ready!
http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/mts.pdf
Figures are in ($$millions)
...........................Receipts............... Outlays................Deficit
Bush 63 months.....10,236,284..........11,673,940......... .. 1,437,659
Monthly Average........162,481..............185,301....... .........22,820
Clinton 96 months...12,563,167..........12,768,744........... ..205,575
Monthly Average.........130,866..............133,008...... ...........2,141
As you can clearly see, treasury receipts under Bush have gone up an average of 25% over the past 63 months of the Bush administration vs the average of 96 months under Clinton. Clinton RAISED taxes, Bush lowered them. Bush inherited a recession and we have been at war for the last 3 years, Clinton sucked off the internet boom.
Sorry Johnny, once again the liberal lie is revealed. Tax cuts increase cash flowing into the treasury and expands the ecomomy long term. Tax increases may provide a short-term boost but are more than offset by a slowing of receipts and leads to a recession after 2-3 years. (see Bush1 tax increase)
So EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you claim has actually happened. Without the tax cuts, we would really be in for a hurting. Wait, we still have 2-1/2 more years of Bush. Watch the treasury receipts boom along with the economy. Of course, we'll bring in a a-hole Dem in '08 who will grab all the credit and the media will pump him up as the great savior when the truth has been under our nose the whole time but nobody will tell it to the American people.
I gave you the link to
www.fms.treas.gov
which happens to be the Bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury.
Bush will top $16 trillion in tax receipts during his administration, blowing away Clinton by over $4 trillion. So much for tax cuts being bad for the American people.
Anybody on the Left care to refute these figures? I have the popcorn and sodi-pop ready!
http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/mts.pdf
Figures are in ($$millions)
...........................Receipts............... Outlays................Deficit
Bush 63 months.....10,236,284..........11,673,940......... .. 1,437,659
Monthly Average........162,481..............185,301....... .........22,820
Clinton 96 months...12,563,167..........12,768,744........... ..205,575
Monthly Average.........130,866..............133,008...... ...........2,141
As you can clearly see, treasury receipts under Bush have gone up an average of 25% over the past 63 months of the Bush administration vs the average of 96 months under Clinton. Clinton RAISED taxes, Bush lowered them. Bush inherited a recession and we have been at war for the last 3 years, Clinton sucked off the internet boom.
Sorry Johnny, once again the liberal lie is revealed. Tax cuts increase cash flowing into the treasury and expands the ecomomy long term. Tax increases may provide a short-term boost but are more than offset by a slowing of receipts and leads to a recession after 2-3 years. (see Bush1 tax increase)
So EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you claim has actually happened. Without the tax cuts, we would really be in for a hurting. Wait, we still have 2-1/2 more years of Bush. Watch the treasury receipts boom along with the economy. Of course, we'll bring in a a-hole Dem in '08 who will grab all the credit and the media will pump him up as the great savior when the truth has been under our nose the whole time but nobody will tell it to the American people.
I gave you the link to
www.fms.treas.gov
which happens to be the Bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury.
Bush will top $16 trillion in tax receipts during his administration, blowing away Clinton by over $4 trillion. So much for tax cuts being bad for the American people.
Last edited by a moderator: