Fetal Stem Cells Trigger Tumors in Sick Child's Brain, Spinal Cord

shagdrum

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
6,568
Reaction score
44
Location
KS
Fetal Stem Cells Trigger Tumors in Sick Child's Brain, Spinal Cord

WASHINGTON — A family desperate to save a child from a lethal brain disease sought highly experimental injections of fetal stem cells — injections that triggered tumors in the boy's brain and spinal cord, Israeli scientists reported Tuesday.

Scientists are furiously trying to harness different types of stem cells — the building blocks for other cells in the body — to regrow damaged tissues and thus treat devastating diseases. But for all the promise, researchers have long warned that they must learn to control newly injected stem cells so they don't grow where they shouldn't, and small studies in people are only just beginning.

Tuesday's report in the journal PLoS Medicine is the first documented case of a human brain tumor — albeit a benign, slow-growing one — after fetal stem cell therapy, and hammers home the need for careful research. The journal is published by the Public Library of Science.

"Patients, please beware," said Dr. John Gearhart, a stem cell scientist at the University of Pennsylvania who wasn't involved in the Israeli boy's care but who sees similarly desperate U.S. patients head abroad to clinics that offer unproven stem cell injections.

"Cells are not drugs. They can misbehave in so many different ways, it just is going to take a good deal of time" to prove how best to pursue the potential therapy, Gearhart said.

The unidentified Israeli boy has a rare, fatal genetic disease with a tongue-twisting name — ataxia telangiectasia, or A-T. Degeneration of a certain brain region gradually robs these children of movement. Plus, a faulty immune system leads to frequent infections and cancers. Most die in their teens or early 20s.

Israeli doctors pieced together the child's history: When he was 9, the family traveled to Russia, to a Moscow clinic that provided injections of neural stem cells from fetuses — immature cells destined to grow into a main type of brain cells. The cells were injected into his brain and spinal cord twice more, at ages 10 and 12.

Back home in Israel at age 13, the boy's A-T was severe enough to require that he use a wheelchair when he also began complaining of headaches. Tests at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv uncovered a growth pushing on his brain stem and a second on his spinal cord. Surgeons removed the spinal cord mass when the boy was 14, in 2006 and they say his general condition has remained stable since then.

But was the boy prone to tumors anyway or were the fetal stem cells to blame? A Tel Aviv University team extensively tested the tumor tissue and concluded it was the fetal cells. Among other evidence, some of the cells were female and had two normal copies of the gene that causes A-T — although that boy's underlying poor immune function could have allowed the growths to take hold.

Using stem cells from multiple fetuses that also were mixed with growth-spurring compounds "may have created a high-risk situation where abnormal growth of more than one cell occurred," wrote lead researcher Dr. Ninette Amariglio of Sheba Medical. She urged better research to "maximize the potential benefits of regenerative medicine while minimizing the risks."

This brain disease wasn't conducive to stem cell therapy in the first place, said stem cell specialist Dr. Marius Wernig of Stanford University, who said it's unclear exactly what was implanted.

"Stem cell transplantations have a humongous potential," Wernig said. But "if people rush out there without really knowing what they're doing ... that really backfires and can bring this whole field to a halt."
 
Lets try nothing!

That will work better for sure....

That's not the point.
The point is, fetal or embryonic stem cells are not the magic bullet that some would like it to believe it is.

The public, in a rush to demonize and divide the public, has been given a artificially high expectations for this kind of treatment. People in wheel chairs have been told that they'd be walking if only the federal government hadn't banned embryonic stem cell research. Of course, both parts of that statement are completely untrue. Embryonic stem cells have shown LESS potential than adult stem cells, and the administration never banned the research.
 
The technology is cutting edge... there is potential but it hasn't been fully developed. What I think is funny is everyone equates stem cells with embryo's... you can get them from other places.
 
The technology is cutting edge... there is potential but it hasn't been fully developed. What I think is funny is everyone equates stem cells with embryo's... you can get them from other places.
Where did you learn this? Did you just hear about it somewhere, or did you do some actual research to back up such a broad statement?
 
The technology is cutting edge... there is potential but it hasn't been fully developed. What I think is funny is everyone equates stem cells with embryo's... you can get them from other places.

Yeah, and Calabrio already mentioned that in post #4. You been paying attention? As Calabrio pointed out, "Embryonic stem cells have shown LESS potential than adult stem cells, and the administration never banned the research"

Embryonic stem cell research has been overhyped and has not shown any promise, but adult stem cells have. However Embryonic stem cell research is overhyped likely because it will subtly allow for more acceptance of abortion. It sure isn't because it actually shows any promise.
 
Exactly, as this thread is indicating, the public doesn't understand the distinction between stem cells and embryonic stem cells.

There are no restrictions on federal funding of adult stem cell research.
And there are some existing lines of embryonic stem cells that are available to receive federal funding as well.
New lines of EMBRYONIC stem cells are not funded with federal dollars, though the research is not illegal. The funding just comes from private sources.

And at least in the material I've read, the despite the original expectations, the embryonic stem cells have not demonstrated the same potential as the adult stem cells, in large part because they aren't as stable and have repeatedly lead to tumor growths. I don't know why, but the embryonic cells are less promising, despite the propaganda otherwise.
 
And at least in the material I've read, the despite the original expectations, the embryonic stem cells have not demonstrated the same potential as the adult stem cells, in large part because they aren't as stable and have repeatedly lead to tumor growths. I don't know why, but the embryonic cells are less promising, despite the propaganda otherwise.
Which, when juxtaposed with the nearly rabid propaganda by the pro-abortion left, would lead to the conclusion that so-called embryonic stem cell research is being trumpeted as a way of increasing abortions.
 
it was received in 07. that's when it was illegal.

i bet they know what they're doing lol.

stupid :q:q:q:qers. hope the guy dies
 
it was received in 07. that's when it was illegal.

i bet they know what they're doing lol.

stupid *****ers. hope the guy dies

And a compassionate voice on the 'pro life' side speaks out, quite eloquently I may add...
 

Members online

Back
Top