:: Get Them Out Of That Hell ::

yas123

New LVC Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
usa
(I have edited out various pics and videos of wounded US soldiers. I dont think it is appropriate to glamourize our soldiers being injured - Joeychgo)

Every day they bring to us from Iraq our son's bodies in a war with no meaning and with only one target which is the satisfaction of Mr. Bush

Mr. Bush, who pushes our country to a new vietnam

he said that the reason of that war is to get out saddam from Iraq but it seems that oil was the target.

And what is the price, it is the blood of our son's which are killed daily on hands of iraqi resistance, it is our country resources which decrease day by day , but unfortunately bush administration controls the media

In our country today the news of our defeat is faked into victory & only the filled half of the glass is shown

Please participate to stop the misleading and share us to stop blood and money bleeding.

I think that most of you will not believe me when I inform you that more than 28.000 soldiers have been killed in Iraq but this is what I have been seeing in the Arab news channels

And the films that transmitted by the terrorists on those channel and on the internet that shows their operations in Iraq documented by video, beside some friends of mine confirmed these informations from there friends that are fighting in Iraq and that they are living in a hell . The terrorist's operations range is between 80 to more than 100 operations daily in Iraq and at least 85% are effective & has deadly casualtys. to confirm truth of these claims there was several sites that were established by me before and it has been removed, you can guess of course by whom? To make sure of what i am saying And to make you watch and feel how our soldiers live in iraqi hell I will bring to your own eyes the visible evidences, documents and scenes from this daily hell that confirm this.




Please participate to stop the misleading and share us to stop blood and money bleeding.

And please if you have an answer to this question please do "for whom thousands of our son's die in a war only for Mr. Bush satisfaction?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yas123 said:
I think that most of you will not believe me when I inform you that more than 28.000 soldiers have been killed in Iraq but this is what I have been seeing in the Arab news channels

Welcome left-winger. PM JohnnybzOOLS so he can help you strap on your body armor because your gonna need it. We're gonna shoot your story so full of holes you're going to be able to use it as a watering bucket when we're done with it.
 
Thanks for showing us what cowardly murderous slime we are fighting against.

Please, take a white flag and fly over to Fallujah and surrender for us. Walk the street and see how far you get before they gun you down and make a movie out of you.

There is no appeasing evil. It is what it is. There is only one way to stop it. Kill it. Kill or be killed. That is what this is coming down to.

It is time we fight this war to win and stop being nice guys about it. As soon as the suicide terrorists get better weapons, they are going to use them anywhere and everywhere. It's us or them. Time to make a choice.

The anti-war movement will cost more innocent US citizens their lives as well as endanger more military personnel.
 
Oh, the Arab news stations report that there are over 28,000 soldiers killed? Well, I suppose if the ever got out of bed with the terrorists maybe they could do something besides make up numbers to bolster the terrorists resolve. If you don't think the AP is salivating over a story like that, then you are sorely mistaken. That would be all over the news here.

PS. Thanks for editing out pics of injured soldiers Joey. That's not coming from a right wing war supporter, just a decent human being.
 
Bryan,

I'm curious, what would you do if you found out that the figure of 28,000 soldiers killed is accurate? If this information was kept from us by the current administration, what would you do? Would you support the deception? I'm just wondering where your morals leave off and your loyalty to a political party begins.
 
barry2952 said:
Bryan,

I'm curious, what would you do if you found out that the figure of 28,000 soldiers killed is accurate? If this information was kept from us by the current administration, what would you do? Would you support the deception? I'm just wondering where your morals leave off and your loyalty to a political party begins.


Probably the same thing we would do if we found out the moon really was made of cheese...
 
barry2952 said:
I'm just wondering where your morals leave off and your loyalty to a political party begins.
Hahaha Barry. Give me a break. NOBODY in this country would back the President and this administration if that were true. You guys are a riot. Where do your morals leave off and loyalty to a political party begin. Geeeez. You must have been away and filled up your cooler with kool-aid! Those of us on the right work with the truth. If the left would stop lying about EVERYTHING, we wouldn't have anything to say because the truth would be self-evident and there would only be one major party in the United States, the Silent Majority Party of which I am a senior member.
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
And what was THIS all about??

That was because of the links posted that lead to sites encouraging violent behavior against US forces and pictures of attacks on our troops.

I don't show pictures of the deceased period. I have that much respect for the dead... Admin agreed with my complaint.
 
FreeFaller said:
Probably the same thing we would do if we found out the moon really was made of cheese...
I give that answer a . . .
10
a perfect reply to a ludicrous question.
 
FreeFaller said:
I don't show pictures of the deceased period. I have that much respect for the dead... Admin agreed with my complaint.


Yes I did - Politics aside - our armed forces deserve the utmost respect.
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
And what was THIS all about??
A left wing nut job (sound familiar) came on the site and posted lots of hate to attract people to his site. The post feature links to videos of suicide attacks on American and British soldiers, with many showing pictures of dead American soldiers. All of this intended to convince the United States to surrender and submit to the terrorists. The sad thing is the tone from the guy is the same tone I feel from many on the left. They like to see our soldier's being killed. They like it when it America is hurting. It furthers their agenda. If it is bad for America, it is good for them. Instead of banning him or deleting the post, Joey and I felt this site would be better served to engage this guy and get his response, although it is probably obvious that he is just a spammer looking to drive traffic. The fact that he is using hate to do it is pretty sad. Any other site would have banned the dude, but not here. It is not what we are about, despite what a very few might think. We'll take on all comers. Just be prepared to take back what you give out.
 
Joeychgo said:
Yes I did - Politics aside - our armed forces deserve the utmost respect.
Me too, but I wanted to verbally beat this guy up for posting the stuff in the 1st place. Nothing but the ultimate in hate on those links. Sick, just sick. And to view it and then think people are going to join his cause is even crazier.
 
MonsterMark said:
A left wing nut job (sound familiar) came on the site and posted lots of hate to attract people to his site. The post feature links to videos of suicide attacks on American and British soldiers, with many showing pictures of dead American soldiers. All of this intended to convince the United States to surrender and submit to the terrorists. The sad thing is the tone from the guy is the same tone I feel from many on the left. They like to see our soldier's being killed. They like it when it America is hurting. It furthers their agenda. If it is bad for America, it is good for them. Instead of banning him or deleting the post, Joey and I felt this site would be better served to engage this guy and get his response, although it is probably obvious that he is just a spammer looking to drive traffic. The fact that he is using hate to do it is pretty sad. Any other site would have banned the dude, but not here. It is not what we are about, despite what a very few might think. We'll take on all comers. Just be prepared to take back what you give out.

Fair enough, I saw MAllen82 giving Joey credit for the edit, didn't know you contributed in a positive way.
 
I give Joey credit for being one of the most level-headed guys on the Internet. I tend to push things for the tabloid value but Joey keeps me in check.
icon12.gif



"didn't know you contributed in a positive way".
Ouch, I think that was a zinger.
 
Barry's back!!!! :Beer Johnny, I didn't know which one edited what, but I only saw Joey's edit dialogue before I posted my remark, and saw MonsterMark's afterwards. Oh, and Barry, to your question about what if 28,000 were the real number, what if you found out that burried somewhere in the dessert there really are wmd's, and what if Saddam was really linked to terrorism? I was just wondering where your hatred for Bush leaves off and your common sense would begin.......but that's just a "what if"............
 
Fair question. When we went into Iraq I was 100% behind GWB because I had devoured the intelligence reports presented by people I thought credible. I listened intently to Powell tell us of definite proof that there WMD capable of destroying our intersts in the area.

I watched the reports with an intensity that was all consuming. I waited patiently for news of the presence of what we perportedly went in for, and the news never came. I don't remember a single reference to freeing the Iraqi people, only weapons of mass destruction. Again and again and again. We have the best surveilence in the world. Wouldn't you think we would have seen some trace of WMD leaving for Syria and Russia as some have claimed?

Even though I hate George Bush I don't hate everything he stands for. I have respect for the office, but not for the man. I just don't like being lied to.

As I asked Bryan, what would you do if you found that the numbers were fixed around the facts. Would there be a Conservative Revolt? What form would that take?
 
Well, hypothetically speaking, there would be no revolt because the president isn't the leader of our party. He doesn't make our policy, he makes the nations policy, which is a totally different job. He would be shunned from the party possibly, and I would lose respect for him, but in the end, you might as well ask me what if I found out Bush was my father. And again, Bush didn't lie about the WMD's. EVERYONE in the free world knew Saddam had them. He's used them before even. But Barry, you never really answered my question. What would you do if we found out all that stuff was true, which is still a HUGE possibility. I would say to Bush if he lied about the number of dead that it disrepects the lives and deaths of all our soldiers throughout time. But I would also ask what his intentions were. But again, if you think that the AP wouldn't have picked up on that huge of a number, you're crazy. That number is touted by the Arab press because like I said, they are in bed with the terrorists. They want us out, they don't like us there, but they don't speak for the majority of middle easterners. A huge majority in Iran are against the government, unfortunately they have no power. And so "news" organizations like Al Jazeera prosper under these tyrranies. By the way, why were you in Iraq? Just out of curiosity.
 
In direct answer to your question I would admit my mistake and kiss the ass of every Repub/Conserv that asked for it. :Beer
 
OK, Hypothetically, what if it were "only" 4,000 soldiers instead of the 2,000 reported. Is deflating the actual figure justifyable under any circumstances? :Bang

BTW, we in "we went to Iraq" meant the US not "we" as in the wife and I.
 
barry2952 said:
OK, Hypothetically, what if it were "only" 4,000 soldiers instead of the 2,000 reported. Is deflating the actual figure justifyable under any circumstances? :Bang
No, but I don't think I implied that there was a difference between stating 4000 or 28000. Unless there was some sort of logistical error to give you 2000 instead of 4000, which isn't likely anyways. If he were to lie, it would be a lie. But again, we're arguing hypotheticals, which is only good to figure out what my character wouls be in the situation, right? I mean, you can't solve anything arguning a hypothetical, and you can't change the way things are. By the way, I feel so much more mature when I debate you as opposed to some others, why is that?
 
I disagree. I believe that we are arguing opinions, not hypotheticals. It is my opinion that WMD will never be found as evidenced by our own military search of every square inch of Iraq.

Don't you think that some greedy bastard weapons scientist wouldn't have come forward for the reward? How about the people trained to use them, where are they? Why haven't they come forward? Think about the support system for WMD, where is it?

There is no evidence that WMD ever existed. We took away his toys in the Gulf war and the following years. He was a limp dick tyrant that should have been overthrown by his own people.

It is my opinion that GWB lied to the American people and I resent it.
 
barry2952 said:
In direct answer to your question I would admit my mistake and kiss the ass of every Repub/Conserv that asked for it. :Beer
Yeah right.

(Cut to scene of pigs flying in hell while throwing snowballs)
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top