Here we go with Katrina and Halliburton

MonsterMark

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
9,225
Reaction score
3
Location
United States
Not like it wasn't expected. LOL. Man, the left is nuts.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Halliburton Subsidiary Taps Contract For Repairs

By Lolita C. Baldor
Associated Press


Monday, September 5, 2005; A20

An Arlington-based Halliburton Co. subsidiary that has been criticized for its reconstruction work in Iraq has begun tapping a $500 million Navy contract to do emergency repairs at Gulf Coast naval and Marine facilities damaged by Hurricane Katrina.

The subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown & Root Services Inc., won the competitive bid contract last July to provide debris removal and other emergency work associated with natural disasters.

Jan Davis, a spokeswoman for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, said yesterday that KBR would receive $12 million for work at the Naval Air Station at Pascagoula, Miss., the Naval Station at Gulfport, Miss., and Stennis Space Center in Mississippi. KBR will receive $4.6 million for work at two smaller Navy facilities in New Orleans and others in the South.

The company has provided similar work after major disasters in the United States and abroad for more than 15 years, including in Florida after Hurricane Andrew.

KBR has been at the center of scrutiny for receiving a five-year, no-bid contract to restore Iraqi oil fields shortly before the war began in 2003. Halliburton has reported being paid $10.7 billion for Iraq-related government work during 2003 and 2004. The company reported its pretax profits from that work as $163 million. Pentagon auditors have questioned tens of millions of dollars of Halliburton charges for its operations there.

Last month three congressional Democrats asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to investigate the demotion of a senior civilian Army official, Bunnatine H. Greenhouse, who publicly criticized the awarding of that contract.

(Huge breaking NEWS!!!)
icon6.gif

Vice President Cheney headed Halliburton from 1995 to 2000, and Democrats have questioned whether the firm received favorable treatment because of his connection.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Of course they have to throw in the last 2 lines even though they have nothing to do with anything.
Wow, Halliburton billed the government $10.3 billion dollars and only reported a profit of $163 million. Barely more than 1% of sales in profits? Sounds to me like Halliburton was working for free.
 
i may not be a demacarat but i shure as hell say yes they they did get favorabillity on that matter damit
 
Why don't they just say Halliburton is the devil and get it over with. Can someone inform me on whether or not Halliburton does a good job with all these contracts? I really don't know.
 
Thanks for that highly informative and entirely unvague response. That reminds me of Fargo, when they are getting a description of Steve Buschemi, and the guy says, "Oh, ya know, he was kinda funny looking." "How was he funny looking?" "Oh, ya know, just in a general sorta way." "So, sometimes Halliburton does things. And sometimes they don't. And sometimes, when they are doing the things they sometimes do, with some of the people that sometimes work for them, sometimes they don't do it right." "Well, what don't they do right?" "Well, ya know, just some stuff that they do, and it's not right. But sometimes they do the stuff that they sometimes do do, and sometimes, this stuff is right. In a general sorta way. Sometimes. But not always. But sometimes."

Oh man. I'm dizzy.
 
well my fother always tell me somtimes LOL so i took that guess lol
 
bigdog1279 said:
well my fother always tell me somtimes LOL so i took that guess lol

And you're guessing they do things wrong sometimes because...?

Is it because you've seen it talked about on TV? Or have you done the research yourself?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top