Is the Tea Party a Feminist Movement?

04SCTLS

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
3,188
Reaction score
7
Location
Lockport
Is the Tea Party a Feminist Movement?

It's becoming an insta-network for aspiring female candidates.

http://www.slate.com/id/2253645/

100512_DX_PalinTN.jpg



In a different political season, Lou Ann Zelenik would be too much an outsider to run for a congressional seat in Tennessee. A single mother, she owned a heavy construction company until she retired in 2007. She likes to remind people that she's a "licensed blaster," which refers both to her technical skills and her Rosie the Riveter attitude. "She's bucked every trend, and if there's ever an obstacle put in her way she breaks right through it," says her spokesman, Jay Heine. Zelenik only really broke through in electoral politics, however, when she got involved with the local Tea Party. She put together a rally in Murfreesboro, and 3,000 people showed up. She hooked into a network of activist local moms who agreed to volunteer on her campaign. "A lot of the tea party women are inspired by seeing a strong woman run for office," adds Heine.

Is the Tea Party a women's movement? More women than men belong—55 percent, according to the latest Quinnipiac poll. And while no movement that uses Michelle Malkin as a poster girl could fairly be described as feminist, the party has become an insta-network for ambitious women like Zelenik. Some are aspiring candidates who could never get traction within the tight, local Republican Party networks. Some are angry-mom-activist types who, like their heroine Sarah Palin, outgrew the PTA. But some would surprise you with their straightforward feminist rage. For the last few years Anna Barone, a Tea Party leader from Mount Vernon, N.Y., has used the e-mail handle annaforhillary.com: "The way they treated Hillary is unforgiveable, and then they did it to Sarah Palin," she said. "I've been to 15 Tea Party meetings and never heard a woman called a name just because she's powerful. I guess you could say the Tea Party is where I truly became a feminist."

If the Tea Party has any legitimate national leadership, it is dominated by women. Of the eight board members of the Tea Party Patriots who serve as national coordinators for the movement, six are women. Fifteen of the 25 state coordinators are women. One of the three main sponsors of the Tax Day Tea Party that launched the movement is a group called Smart Girl Politics. The site started out as a mommy blog and has turned into a mobilizing campaign that trains future activists and candidates. Despite its explosive growth over the last year, it is still operated like a feminist cooperative, with three stay-at-home moms taking turns raising babies and answering e-mails and phone calls. Spokeswoman Rebecca Wales describes it as a group made up of "a lot of mama bears worried about their families." The Tea Party, she says, is a natural home for women because "for a long time people have seen the parties as good-ole'-boy, male-run institutions. In the Tea Party, women have finally found their voice."

Some of Wales' mama bears are the heirs of old-timey political movements like the Temperance Movement, which women led as keepers of moral purity and domestic harmony. Their more immediate inspiration is the conservative-mom revolution of the mid-1990s. During the Gingrich revolution, a crew of evangelical moms came in, vowing to protect traditional family values. At that time, there was still some ambivalence among conservatives about women abandoning their domestic duties to run for public office. I recall back then interviewing Vern Smith, husband of Linda Smith, then a new Republican congresswoman from Washington. "It's funny, with Linda away, we end up sacrificing some of that traditional family life to pass some of that heritage to our children," he told me.
Now that ambivalence is mostly gone. The conservative woman in public office or otherwise working too hard is an accepted breed. Her rise was accelerated by the recession, which pushed millions more women into the work force, sometimes as the family's only breadwinner. The stay-at-home mom is a vanishing type anyway; only one in five families has a working father and stay-at-home mother. And then there's Sarah Palin, who created a whole new model of mother activist. None of the contradictions got worked out: She works; she has small children; she defends the traditional family although she's probably home only one day a week. Never mind, after 20 years, conservatives have made peace with her type, and embraced it.
And so the conservative mama bear has become a fully operational, effective political archetype. She is mother as übercompetent CEO, monitoring with vigilance her own family bank account, the local school bank account, and, as a natural extension, the nation's. "Women are sitting at home and balancing their checkbook, leaving money for groceries and utilities and fun stuff," says Jenny Beth Martin, one of the Patriots' national coordinators. "They realize that these things that apply to their household budgets also apply to government." In explaining their view on the stimulus money, several Tea Party mama bears used examples they'd heard at PTA meetings. Why should the school waste money on a part-time Chinese teacher who gets full benefits? Why should the government waste money on ant farms and exotic fish?

Christen Varley is the president of the Boston Tea Party. Last year, her husband spent some time without a job. And so, after 11 years of staying home with their daughter, Varley got part-time work at a nonprofit. She also got involved in local politics and last year, started a tea party branch. At the meetings, equal numbers of men and women show up. But women end up being more dedicated. They write the newsletters and put together the database. When the group first put together the steering committee, it had four men and two women. "We ought to have a few more women," she thought, so she added some. "We're more likely to get fired up," she says. "Women take it personally. These are my kids they're coming after."
Mostly what Varley likes is that the movement feels like an actual tea party. She used to go to Republican town committee meetings, but except for the annual Christmas party, it was all "work, work, work." At Tea Party meetings, the women "get together and commiserate, and cheerlead each other. When the media and the culture demonize us, we feel good that there are other people just like us. We're building a lot of friendships."
The mama bears are not the only type of women in the movement. Local parties in Seattle, New York, and California, for example, breed more-straightforward feminists. (Remember annaforhillary.com.) Some of the women I interviewed are longtime women's activists who feel alienated from both parties and are happy to have a fresh start. Betty Jean Kling runs a group called Majority United, dedicated to getting more women in office and fighting violence against women. Like many activists I talked to, Kling thinks social issues such as abortion are just wedges to drive women apart. (Varley, who is Catholic and pro-life, said the same thing: "We would be stupid to bring up abortion at a meeting.")
Kling says the two parties "just throw crumbs to women" and insult them. She has given over her radio show to women Tea Party activists and candidates, and started a network of local chapters. "Each woman has her reasons for joining," she says, "but I would like to believe that deep down she has a degree of pride in knowing that when she is voting out the incumbents she may be voting in a new woman with new ideas who will be really amenable to women's rights."
Like other Tea Party ideologies, the movement's feminist streak is not always consistent or coherent. But affiliated women candidates take away a unifying narrative that taps into both traditionalism and feminist rage. It's the feminism of the 1980 Dolly Parton movie 9 to 5, part anger against the good ole' boys and part "leave me alone." Candidate Liz Carter complains about the lack of women in any congressional seats in Georgia. Fox analyst Angela McGowan, running for Congress in Mississippi, calls herself a "warrior." Christine O'Donnell, running for Senate in Delaware, claims she's an antidote to the "lords of the back room." Lords of the back room. There's a phrase Germaine Greer would have liked.

_______________________________________________________________

So moms are the new warriors who are going to save the country.
An interesting angle not reported on much yet.
 
No, it just reflects America.
A country where people are judge by the character and ability, not their race or gender.

That's in contrast to the Democrat party and left wing where they engage in radical identity policies designed to divide the country.
 
Being women we'll see if they're more MYOB than the preachy male moralizers in the Republican party.
That would be refreshing.
 
Being women we'll see if they're more MYOB than the preachy male moralizers in the Republican party.
That would be refreshing.

I don't think gender influences whether you think the power of the federal government should be used to dictate how you live your life. The democrat party is full of women, (Clinton, Pelosi, foxpaws) and that party has abandoned the notion of limited government, or constitutional republic government.

But Republicans need to embrace the classic liberalism that makes America great rather then the 20th century progressivism which has been rotted our country form the inside these past hundred years.

Government is not the answer.
And I'll support a man or woman who puts their faith in the individual and not government.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is the Tea Party a Feminist Movement?

It's becoming an insta-network for aspiring female candidates.

http://www.slate.com/id/2253645/

100512_DX_PalinTN.jpg



In a different political season, Lou Ann Zelenik would be too much an outsider to run for a congressional seat in Tennessee. A single mother, she owned a heavy construction company until she retired in 2007. She likes to remind people that she's a "licensed blaster," which refers both to her technical skills and her Rosie the Riveter attitude. "She's bucked every trend, and if there's ever an obstacle put in her way she breaks right through it," says her spokesman, Jay Heine. Zelenik only really broke through in electoral politics, however, when she got involved with the local Tea Party. She put together a rally in Murfreesboro, and 3,000 people showed up. She hooked into a network of activist local moms who agreed to volunteer on her campaign. "A lot of the tea party women are inspired by seeing a strong woman run for office," adds Heine.

Is the Tea Party a women's movement? More women than men belong—55 percent, according to the latest Quinnipiac poll. And while no movement that uses Michelle Malkin as a poster girl could fairly be described as feminist, the party has become an insta-network for ambitious women like Zelenik. Some are aspiring candidates who could never get traction within the tight, local Republican Party networks. Some are angry-mom-activist types who, like their heroine Sarah Palin, outgrew the PTA. But some would surprise you with their straightforward feminist rage. For the last few years Anna Barone, a Tea Party leader from Mount Vernon, N.Y., has used the e-mail handle annaforhillary.com: "The way they treated Hillary is unforgiveable, and then they did it to Sarah Palin," she said. "I've been to 15 Tea Party meetings and never heard a woman called a name just because she's powerful. I guess you could say the Tea Party is where I truly became a feminist."

If the Tea Party has any legitimate national leadership, it is dominated by women. Of the eight board members of the Tea Party Patriots who serve as national coordinators for the movement, six are women. Fifteen of the 25 state coordinators are women. One of the three main sponsors of the Tax Day Tea Party that launched the movement is a group called Smart Girl Politics. The site started out as a mommy blog and has turned into a mobilizing campaign that trains future activists and candidates. Despite its explosive growth over the last year, it is still operated like a feminist cooperative, with three stay-at-home moms taking turns raising babies and answering e-mails and phone calls. Spokeswoman Rebecca Wales describes it as a group made up of "a lot of mama bears worried about their families." The Tea Party, she says, is a natural home for women because "for a long time people have seen the parties as good-ole'-boy, male-run institutions. In the Tea Party, women have finally found their voice."

Some of Wales' mama bears are the heirs of old-timey political movements like the Temperance Movement, which women led as keepers of moral purity and domestic harmony. Their more immediate inspiration is the conservative-mom revolution of the mid-1990s. During the Gingrich revolution, a crew of evangelical moms came in, vowing to protect traditional family values. At that time, there was still some ambivalence among conservatives about women abandoning their domestic duties to run for public office. I recall back then interviewing Vern Smith, husband of Linda Smith, then a new Republican congresswoman from Washington. "It's funny, with Linda away, we end up sacrificing some of that traditional family life to pass some of that heritage to our children," he told me.
Now that ambivalence is mostly gone. The conservative woman in public office or otherwise working too hard is an accepted breed. Her rise was accelerated by the recession, which pushed millions more women into the work force, sometimes as the family's only breadwinner. The stay-at-home mom is a vanishing type anyway; only one in five families has a working father and stay-at-home mother. And then there's Sarah Palin, who created a whole new model of mother activist. None of the contradictions got worked out: She works; she has small children; she defends the traditional family although she's probably home only one day a week. Never mind, after 20 years, conservatives have made peace with her type, and embraced it.
And so the conservative mama bear has become a fully operational, effective political archetype. She is mother as übercompetent CEO, monitoring with vigilance her own family bank account, the local school bank account, and, as a natural extension, the nation's. "Women are sitting at home and balancing their checkbook, leaving money for groceries and utilities and fun stuff," says Jenny Beth Martin, one of the Patriots' national coordinators. "They realize that these things that apply to their household budgets also apply to government." In explaining their view on the stimulus money, several Tea Party mama bears used examples they'd heard at PTA meetings. Why should the school waste money on a part-time Chinese teacher who gets full benefits? Why should the government waste money on ant farms and exotic fish?

Christen Varley is the president of the Boston Tea Party. Last year, her husband spent some time without a job. And so, after 11 years of staying home with their daughter, Varley got part-time work at a nonprofit. She also got involved in local politics and last year, started a tea party branch. At the meetings, equal numbers of men and women show up. But women end up being more dedicated. They write the newsletters and put together the database. When the group first put together the steering committee, it had four men and two women. "We ought to have a few more women," she thought, so she added some. "We're more likely to get fired up," she says. "Women take it personally. These are my kids they're coming after."
Mostly what Varley likes is that the movement feels like an actual tea party. She used to go to Republican town committee meetings, but except for the annual Christmas party, it was all "work, work, work." At Tea Party meetings, the women "get together and commiserate, and cheerlead each other. When the media and the culture demonize us, we feel good that there are other people just like us. We're building a lot of friendships."
The mama bears are not the only type of women in the movement. Local parties in Seattle, New York, and California, for example, breed more-straightforward feminists. (Remember annaforhillary.com.) Some of the women I interviewed are longtime women's activists who feel alienated from both parties and are happy to have a fresh start. Betty Jean Kling runs a group called Majority United, dedicated to getting more women in office and fighting violence against women. Like many activists I talked to, Kling thinks social issues such as abortion are just wedges to drive women apart. (Varley, who is Catholic and pro-life, said the same thing: "We would be stupid to bring up abortion at a meeting.")
Kling says the two parties "just throw crumbs to women" and insult them. She has given over her radio show to women Tea Party activists and candidates, and started a network of local chapters. "Each woman has her reasons for joining," she says, "but I would like to believe that deep down she has a degree of pride in knowing that when she is voting out the incumbents she may be voting in a new woman with new ideas who will be really amenable to women's rights."
Like other Tea Party ideologies, the movement's feminist streak is not always consistent or coherent. But affiliated women candidates take away a unifying narrative that taps into both traditionalism and feminist rage. It's the feminism of the 1980 Dolly Parton movie 9 to 5, part anger against the good ole' boys and part "leave me alone." Candidate Liz Carter complains about the lack of women in any congressional seats in Georgia. Fox analyst Angela McGowan, running for Congress in Mississippi, calls herself a "warrior." Christine O'Donnell, running for Senate in Delaware, claims she's an antidote to the "lords of the back room." Lords of the back room. There's a phrase Germaine Greer would have liked.

_______________________________________________________________

So moms are the new warriors who are going to save the country.
An interesting angle not reported on much yet.

Well now, this is news to YOU...:D

Besides, do you really think that folks want to hear that their mothers and grandmothes are racist nutbags?

Which media story do you suppose is more favorable to the ....media?
 
Well now, this is news to YOU...:D

Besides, do you really think that folks want to hear that their mothers and grandmothes are racist nutbags?

Which media story do you suppose is more favorable to the ....media?


This is not an unfavorable story.
Women want to get into politics but the old f a r t s in the republican party won't let them have real power.
They are the other kind of feminists.
All the pictures in the media of the Tea Party were of guys with Obama as Hitler signs and swastikas and such.
This is the kinder gentler side.
 
This is not an unfavorable story.
Women want to get into politics but the old f a r t s in the republican party won't let them have real power.
They are the other kind of feminists.
All the pictures in the media of the Tea Party were of guys with Obama as Hitler signs and swastikas and such.
This is the kinder gentler side.

The "old farts" won't let women have power in the Republican party?
What do you base this on? If anything, I would argue that the "old guard" in the Republican party is preventing ANYONE from taking real power.

And the tragedy is that this "old guard" is embraces a big government, Rockefeller or Nixon philosophy of government. The women that are highlighted in this story aren't popular, nor were they denied power, because they were women... it's because of what they stand. Just like the men who share their philosophy. This effort to imply some kind of sexism by the author is misleading. Or the result of the author having a warped frame.

All the picture from the media with "hitler signs" were selected because of the editorial decision to cast the Tea Party, and related movements, in as negative light as possible.


Again, the effort to frame this in terms of gender is either because of the authors editorial desire to indirectly attack, or because of their left wing, identification politics bias, where they just can't see what's really happening. They're perspective is just skewed.
 
All the picture from the media with "hitler signs" were selected because of the editorial decision to cast the Tea Party, and related movements, in as negative light as possible.

Cal - I don't think the first few times we saw 'hitler signs' it was because of a conscious decision on the part of the media, it was more of a 'Oh my God, can you believe this' shock. If you put up a sign with a swastika on it, you better believe you will get press.

However, now I do think the media looks for and targets those type of signs, and I have also seen that the tea party is toning down the visuals. I noticed here that they are policing themselves, telling others in the group to not carry signs like that.

about the article...

I think it is fine that some women seem to be embracing the tea party dynamics - the world is usually a better place when there are strong women involved, on both sides of the fence.

I don't like Sarah P. but I do like that the 'face' of the movement is a strong woman. Perhaps, finally the far right, can realize the potential of having a sense of cooperation between the sexes instead of having the women as 'accessories' or that little woman at home, or view them as someone who is stealing jobs, or being 'unnatural' because they want to work outside the home, or get involved in politics. I don't agree with all of them, but Thatcher, Merkel, Ghandi, Meir, Tymoshenko were/are important leaders.

There is an old saying - weak men make strong women... I wonder if this has anything to do with the right at this time, the old guard...

I will however really take umbrage to this statement...

Kling says the two parties "just throw crumbs to women" and insult them

I would say that isn't true of either party - even the Republicans have made strides in this area, there are many, many strong and important women in the Republican party, at the podium, and behind the scenes. And the Dems have been empowering women for quite a while. I have worked for the Dems for a long, long time and have never felt like I had 'just crumbs'... It is in fact one of the few places I felt as though gender was finally taking a back seat... or not even involved.
 
The "old farts" won't let women have power in the Republican party?
What do you base this on? If anything, I would argue that the "old guard" in the Republican party is preventing ANYONE from taking real power.

And the tragedy is that this "old guard" is embraces a big government, Rockefeller or Nixon philosophy of government. The women that are highlighted in this story aren't popular, nor were they denied power, because they were women... it's because of what they stand. Just like the men who share their philosophy. This effort to imply some kind of sexism by the author is misleading. Or the result of the author having a warped frame.

All the picture from the media with "hitler signs" were selected because of the editorial decision to cast the Tea Party, and related movements, in as negative light as possible.


Again, the effort to frame this in terms of gender is either because of the authors editorial desire to indirectly attack, or because of their left wing, identification politics bias, where they just can't see what's really happening. They're perspective is just skewed.


Some things are what they seem.
Someone noticed the many women in the Tea Party and wrote a story about it.
I don't think this is some kind of attack even if you see it that way.
After all how can there be an unbiased story in the media? :rolleyes:
 
Cal - I don't think the first few times we saw 'hitler signs' it was because of a conscious decision on the part of the media, it was more of a 'Oh my God, can you believe this' shock. If you put up a sign with a swastika on it, you better believe you will get press.

However, now I do think the media looks for and targets those type of signs, and I have also seen that the tea party is toning down the visuals. I noticed here that they are policing themselves, telling others in the group to not carry signs like that.

:eek::eek2::Bang

Bull:q:q:q:q.

The Tea Party has never been about swastikas, and people that imply that they were are some of the most dishonest and disgusting people you'll find on the face of the planet.

They are that way (the disgusting ones) because instead of acknowledging the differences in opinion being expressed by their neighbors, they would instead paint them to be an enemy to be despised and feared.

Un:q:q:q:qingbelievable.
 
This is not an unfavorable story.
Women want to get into politics but the old f a r t s in the republican party won't let them have real power.
They are the other kind of feminists.
All the pictures in the media of the Tea Party were of guys with Obama as Hitler signs and swastikas and such.
This is the kinder gentler side.

I understand that the article is not critical.

I have also understood this to be the case since the Tea Party erupted.

I also understand that the fear on the left is that a true grass roots group, representing people who usually vote in every election, has turned against this administration.

Which is why you hear them called racists and see swastika signs at their rallys.

Propaganda.
 
:eek::eek2::Bang

Bull:q:q:q:q.

The Tea Party has never been about swastikas, and people that imply that they were are some of the most dishonest and disgusting people you'll find on the face of the planet.

They are that way (the disgusting ones) because instead of acknowledging the differences in opinion being expressed by their neighbors, they would instead paint them to be an enemy to be despised and feared.

Un:q:q:q:qingbelievable.

I don't think the tea party is about swastikas - however, that doesn't mean there weren't signs at their rallies that had swastikas on them. You get fringe elements with any group - the tea party attracted some fringe elements that decided painting swastikas on their signs was a good idea.

I have seen tea party members in rallies go up to people at the rally and ask them to not display a sign, recently. Those people who have those signs are there to be part of the tea party group - however, they might not understand that the symbolism that they are carrying is darn offensive.

It could be an education process, it could be a reality of if you are perceived as a leaning to the 'right' group - you are going to attract people of that ilk.

Just like if you are having a rally on the left, you have to deal with Code Pink wackos and their like...

Code Pink members are way left - but do you want them out there as a very visual part of your rally - probably not, but they do support parts of your cause, no matter how wacky they appear.

The people who are carrying signs with swastikas on them probably support parts of the tea party cause - but does the tea party want them to be a visual part of their rally - nope.
 
Still waiting for the 'I was not implying' part of your speech.

Because that's what you did in your first post.

Imply what - that they were tea party members? I don't have a clue if they are or not. It is such a loose organization, they like it that way. So in a loose organization you are going to have all sort of splinter factions... They might not embrace the swastika carrying people, but the swastika carrying people embraced them.

I did say that I don't think that the 'tea party' was about swastikas.. but it is a bit hard to find out what they are about - in denver there are at least 5 or 6 groups that claim to be tea party groups - at least 3 of them are splinter groups from the others...Oh, I don't like Sherry and how this is going...I am going to form my own group...

So, yes, those people could have been tea party members. As I said, the left deals with crazies all the time that are in the Democratic party. Ask the Republicans - they have had to deal with crazies in their party too...

This is a cross you must bear. I bet if you asked those swastika carrying people if they belonged to the tea party you would have gotten a 'heck yes'.
 
Welcome to the party, KStills....
Remember when you thought we were the jerks for being so impatient with foxpaws?
 
Palin predicts 'stampede of pink elephants' -- including Fiorina -- to trample Democratic incumbents

This report was written by Katie Brandenburg of the Washington bureau.

Sarah Palin predicted Friday that a new wave of antiabortion feminists, including California Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, will soon take power in Washington.

"This year will be remembered as the year that commonsense conservative women get things done for our country," Palin said at the Susan B. Anthony List Celebration of Life Breakfast in Washington.


sarah%20palin%20sba%20ap.jpg
[SIZE=-3]AP photo[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=-2]Sarah Palin addresses the Susan B. Anthony List event.
[/SIZE]

The former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee warned that a "stampede of pink elephants" concerned with policies including abortion and government spending would soon descend on Washington.

Palin said the prominence of new female politicians who are antiabortion represents a return to an older brand of feminism endorsed by those in the original suffragist movement.

Ax examples of this back-to-the-future feminism, she singled out former Hewlett-Packard CEO Fiorina, who hopes to win the GOP nomination to take on Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Jane Norton, who is running for U.S. Senate in Colorado. Both have been endorsed by the SBA List.

Palin said abortion-rights-backing feminist groups don't empower women in the same way antiabortion groups do.

"Even these feminist groups want to try to tell women this message that 'No, you're not capable of doing both,'" Palin said. "'You can't give your child life and still pursue a career or education. You're not strong enough, you're not capable.'"

The Susan B. Anthony List is a national organization that supports anti-abortion women in politics. SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said the retirement of Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., and the defeat of Rep. Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va., in a primary election on Tuesday, were major victories for the pro-life movement. She called for a routing of antiabortion Democrats who voted for health care legislation this year.

"There are others that need to be moved quickly into the private sector, they are the foot soldiers in the Senate for this president who passed this health care bill who made us look complicit in all these abortions," she said.

Dannenfelser pointed to Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., as some of the politicians her group hopes to see defeated in November. Lincoln faces a tough Democratic primary on May 18.

Palin said she has always been antiabortion, but her experience giving birth to a child with Down Syndrome -- and her teenage daughter's out-of-wedlock pregnancy -- has given her a unique perspective, showing her that God has a plan and purpose for all pregnancies.

"Our experiences gave me tremendous empathy for the woman who does finds herself in less than ideal circumstances," Palin said. "I now understand why a woman would be tempted perhaps to think that well it might just be an easier way out to try to change the circumstances...I understand what goes through her mind if even for just a brief moment, a split second, even, because I've been there."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=63612#ixzz0nzlEVJyS


_____________________________________________________________

Apparently she's unaware that the phrase "pink elephants" conventionally refers to Delerium tremens?


For a hottie she seems to like heffer metaphors for women such as grizzlies, pink elephants. mamma bears and other big game that under other circumstances she may be shooting at from a helicopter :D

 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top