John Kerry is now posting on Daily Kos

MonsterMark

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
9,225
Reaction score
3
Location
United States
:eek:

Yes, you have to see it to believe it.

Senator Kerry reaches out to mainstream Democrats by blogging on Daily Kos.:shifty:
 
Anyone want to join me in taking this guy on?

We need a similar screen name so people see us as a group.

Something like...

sKERRY1
sKERRY2
sKERRY3
etc.

Give it to this guy from all sides.

Be polite but don't let his b.s. responses go unchallenged.
 
I don't know if I can be polite to him...

...just visiting that site and reading his "thoughts" were enough to make me sick to my stomach. How somebody like him goes to sleep at night is beyond me. I guess it's easy when you believe your own lies.
 
This cracks me up...


Pardon my cynicisim but is this (4.00 / 2)

John Kerry or just some guy in his office?
That said, I agree with everything you say.

-4.63,-3.54 If the people will lead the leaders will follow

by calebfaux on Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 04:35:59 PM PDT
[ Parent ]


Correction - "Someone" (4.00 / 2)

shouldn't have assumed "guy"

-4.63,-3.54 If the people will lead the leaders will follow

by calebfaux on Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 04:37:33 PM PDT
[ Parent ]


Wouldn't want to insult anybody on a liberal blog site now would we.
 
I don't know if he even could respond. You'd have to drop a major bombshell to get him to notice you out of thousands of responses. But it would be interesting to see the dialogue wouldn't it?
 
I'd be concerned a uninform name would just make it easier for eveyrone to get banned. If you want to coordinate a name, it'll need to be more subtle. Or- we could just use the same screennames we use here.
 
Calabrio said:
I'd be concerned a uninform name would just make it easier for eveyrone to get banned. If you want to coordinate a name, it'll need to be more subtle. Or- we could just use the same screennames we use here.
I would prefer we not use our screen names here over there.

I can make a sticky where you can post the name you are using over there so we know who you are? Or we could secretly PM each other with our devious plans to put the supreme commander of the liberal forces on the defensive.

Just remember, if you want to be heard, you have to be polite.
 
MonsterMark said:
I would prefer we not use our screen names here over there.

I can make a sticky where you can post the name you are using over there so we know who you are? Or we could secretly PM each other with our devious plans to put the supreme commander of the liberal forces on the defensive.

Just remember, if you want to be heard, you have to be polite.

I'm in, post the sticky. :F
 
FreeFaller said:
I don't know if he even could respond. You'd have to drop a major bombshell to get him to notice you out of thousands of responses. But it would be interesting to see the dialogue wouldn't it?


I agree........ But my opinion, he'd hand any of the RWW's in here their asses in a debate.
 
95DevilleNS said:
I agree........ But my opinion, he'd hand any of the RWW's in here their asses in a debate.

Well, he is a US Senator with decades of experience in the political field. So he would definatly be at an advantage if only because of the massive amount of information he is privy to. But a weak position is a weak position. His main disadvantage in debate is that politicians tend to pander to one side or the other and the moment he started bashing I would consider it a win for his opposition (and vice-versa). However, in a purely informative debate I think there are people in this forum who could more than stand up to him.

That's the key to debate...a valid position requires no defense (only explanation)...and is therefore less likely to lead to bashing.
 
John Kerry had this to say this weekend...

"Many people surmise that one of the reasons we haven't been attacked here is because [terrorists] are being so successful at doing what they need to do to attack us in Iraq and elsewhere."


Kerry is numbnuts. I'm looking for the full transcript of sKerry's stupendous comments if anyone can come up with it, I would appreciate it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
95DevilleNS said:
I agree........ But my opinion, he'd hand any of the RWW's in here their asses in a debate.

Your wishful thinking is apparent only because you routinely get your ass handed to you in a debate.
 
fossten said:
Your wishful thinking is apparent only because you routinely get your ass handed to you in a debate.


Actually, FreeFaller said it best "Well, he is a US Senator with decades of experience in the political field. So he would definatly be at an advantage if only because of the massive amount of information he is privy to." Not to mention he did run for president and he did hand Bush his ass in several (not all) presidential debates..........

So stop being such a whiney little girl and taking things personal. It's not ALL about you master-debater.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Actually, FreeFaller said it best "Well, he is a US Senator with decades of experience in the political field. So he would definatly be at an advantage if only because of the massive amount of information he is privy to." Not to mention he did run for president and he did hand Bush his ass in several (not all) presidential debates..........

So stop being such a whiney little girl and taking things personal. It's not ALL about you master-debater.

Aww, did I get under your skin? Here's a tissue...:N
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top