Liberal Higher Learning

fossten

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
6
Location
Louisville
December 19, 2006
http://media.yaf.org/latest/12_19_06.cfm

The Dirty Dozen: America’s Most Bizarre and Politically Correct College Courses

Occidental College’s The Phallus ranked the most bizarre class of ’06 -’07

HERNDON, VA – As college costs soar through the roof—averaging above $31,000 a year for tuition, room & board—today’s college students study adultery, the male genital, and Native American feminism. The Dirty Dozen highlights the most bizarre and troubling instances of leftist activism supplanting traditional scholarship in our nation’s colleges and universities.

The growth of these courses gobbles up tons of money and resources and ignores scholarship from conservatives. For instance, books and speeches from the late Milton Friedman and Ambassador Jean Kirkpatrick are rarely studied in the classroom, yet leftist works are prevalent in college classrooms nationwide. Scores of courses were researched from hundreds of the nation’s leading schools. The Dirty Dozen is the worst of the worst. This year, we have also included a dishonorable mentions category—courses that could’ve easily made the list.

When one examines these classes, keep in mind that a recent study found that only one in four Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment, but more than half can name at least two family members of “The Simpsons.” The Washington Post reports that only 31 percent of college grads could read and comprehend complex books, while The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that 40 percent of college students need remedial work in math and English. Are we really putting our educational resources to the best use?

Young America’s Foundation Spokesman Jason Mattera remarks, “The Dirty Dozen demonstrates that professors still have an obsession with dividing people on the basis of their skin color, sexuality, and gender. They also can’t seem to shake off a strong admiration for Karl Marx and his murderous ideology—apparently the 100-plus million totalitarian regimes have murdered over the years is not enough?!”

Occidental College’s The Phallus covers a broad study on the relation “between the phallus and the penis, the meaning of the phallus, phallologocentrism, the lesbian phallus, the Jewish phallus, the Latino phallus, and the relation of the phallus and fetishism.”

Queer Musicology at the University of California-Los Angeles explores how “sexual difference and complex gender identities in music and among musicians have incited productive consternation” during the 1990s. Music under consideration includes works by Schubert and Holly Near, Britten and Cole Porter, and Pussy Tourette.

Amherst College in Massachusetts offers Taking Marx Seriously: “Should Marx be given another chance?” Students in this class are asked to question if Marxism still has “credibility,” while also inquiring if societies can gain new insights by “returning to [Marx’s] texts.” Coming to Marx’s rescue, this course also states that Lenin, Stalin, and Pol Pot misapplied the concepts of Marxism.

Students enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania’s Adultery Novel read a series of 19th and 20th century works about “adultery” and watch “several adultery films.” Students apply “various critical approaches in order to place adultery into its aesthetic, social and cultural context, including: sociological descriptions of modernity, Marxist examinations of family as a social and economic institution” and “feminist work on the construction of gender.”

Occidental College—making the list twice for the second year in a row—offers Blackness, which elaborates on a “new blackness,” “critical blackness,” “post-blackness,” and an “unforgivable blackness,” which all combine to create a “feminist New Black Man.”

Border Crossings, Borderlands: Transnational Feminist Perspectives on Immigration is University of Washington’s way of exploring the immigration debate. The class allegedly unearths what is “highlighted and concealed in contemporary public debates about U.S. immigration” policy.

Whiteness: The Other Side of Racism is Mount Holyoke College’s attempt to analyze race. The class seeks to spark thought on: “What is whiteness?” “How is it related to racism?” “What are the legal frameworks of whiteness?” “How is whiteness enacted in everyday practice?” And how does whiteness impact the “lives of whites and people of color?

Native American Feminisms at the University of Michigan looks at the development of “Native feminist thought” and its “relationship both to Native land-based struggles and non-Native feminist movements.”

Johns Hopkins University offers Mail Order Brides: Understanding the Philippines in Southeast Asian Context, which is a supposedly deep look into Filipino kinship and gender.

Cornell University’s Cyberfeminism investigates “the emergence of cyberfeminism in theory and art in the context of feminism/post feminism and the accelerated technological developments of the last thirty years of the twentieth century.”

Duke University’s American Dreams/American Realities course seeks to unearth “such myths as ‘rags to riches,’ ‘beacon to the world,’ and the ‘frontier,’ in defining the American character.”

Swarthmore College’s Nonviolent Responses to Terrorism “deconstruct terrorism” and “build on promising nonviolent procedures to combat today’s terrorism.” The “non-violent” struggle Blacks pursued in the 1960s is outlined as a mode for tackling today’s terrorism.

Dishonorable Mentions

UC-Berkeley’s Sex Change City: Theorizing History in Genderqueer San Francisco explores “implications of U.S. imperialism and colonization for the construction of gender in 19th-century San Francisco’s multicultural, multiracial, and multiethnic” community. The course also covers “contemporary transgender, queer, genderqueer, and post-queer cultural production and politics” and “the regulation of gender-variant practices in public space by San Francisco’s Anglo-European elites.”

Cornell University’s Sex, Rugs, Salt, & Coal asks students to ponder the questions: Why are “oriental” rugs collector’s items? How did we come to keep salt shakers on our dinner tables? When did coal start replacing wood as a fuel source?

Hollins University’s Drag: Theories of Transgenderism and Performance analyzes historical, theoretical, and autobiographical perspectives on drag, including transgenderism and performance in non-Western cultures.

University of Colorado-Boulder’s Introduction to Lesbian, Bisexual, and Gay Literature introduces some of the forms, concerns, and genres of contemporary lesbian, bisexual, and gay writing in English.

Swarthmore College’s Peace Study in Action partners students with a local “peace” organization “to study its mode of action and develop a document or brief that brings useful peace research to the service of the organization.”

Swarthmore College’s Renaissance Sexualities explores the homoerotic, chastity and friendship, marriage, adultery, and incest.

Oberlin College’s first-year seminar, She Works Hard for the Money: Women, Work and the Persistence of Inequality, “tackles” price differences, occupational segregation, comparable worth, and other factors that supposedly uncover institutional discrimination against women.

Hollins University’s Lesbian Pulp Fiction examines “a literary genre that critics once deemed ‘trash’ and moralists commonly found ‘scandalous,’ but that formed a crucial part in the burgeoning canon of queer literature.”
 
fossten said:
December 19, 2006
http://media.yaf.org/latest/12_19_06.cfm

The Dirty Dozen: America’s Most Bizarre and Politically Correct College Courses

Occidental College’s The Phallus ranked the most bizarre class of ’06 -’07

HERNDON, VA – As college costs soar through the roof—averaging above $31,000 a year for tuition, room & board—today’s college students study adultery, the male genital, and Native American feminism. The Dirty Dozen highlights the most bizarre and troubling instances of leftist activism supplanting traditional scholarship in our nation’s colleges and universities.

The growth of these courses gobbles up tons of money and resources and ignores scholarship from conservatives. For instance, books and speeches from the late Milton Friedman and Ambassador Jean Kirkpatrick are rarely studied in the classroom, yet leftist works are prevalent in college classrooms nationwide. Scores of courses were researched from hundreds of the nation’s leading schools. The Dirty Dozen is the worst of the worst. This year, we have also included a dishonorable mentions category—courses that could’ve easily made the list.

When one examines these classes, keep in mind that a recent study found that only one in four Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment, but more than half can name at least two family members of “The Simpsons.” The Washington Post reports that only 31 percent of college grads could read and comprehend complex books, while The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that 40 percent of college students need remedial work in math and English. Are we really putting our educational resources to the best use?

Young America’s Foundation Spokesman Jason Mattera remarks, “The Dirty Dozen demonstrates that professors still have an obsession with dividing people on the basis of their skin color, sexuality, and gender. They also can’t seem to shake off a strong admiration for Karl Marx and his murderous ideology—apparently the 100-plus million totalitarian regimes have murdered over the years is not enough?!”

Occidental College’s The Phallus covers a broad study on the relation “between the phallus and the penis, the meaning of the phallus, phallologocentrism, the lesbian phallus, the Jewish phallus, the Latino phallus, and the relation of the phallus and fetishism.”

Queer Musicology at the University of California-Los Angeles explores how “sexual difference and complex gender identities in music and among musicians have incited productive consternation” during the 1990s. Music under consideration includes works by Schubert and Holly Near, Britten and Cole Porter, and Pussy Tourette.

Amherst College in Massachusetts offers Taking Marx Seriously: “Should Marx be given another chance?” Students in this class are asked to question if Marxism still has “credibility,” while also inquiring if societies can gain new insights by “returning to [Marx’s] texts.” Coming to Marx’s rescue, this course also states that Lenin, Stalin, and Pol Pot misapplied the concepts of Marxism.

Students enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania’s Adultery Novel read a series of 19th and 20th century works about “adultery” and watch “several adultery films.” Students apply “various critical approaches in order to place adultery into its aesthetic, social and cultural context, including: sociological descriptions of modernity, Marxist examinations of family as a social and economic institution” and “feminist work on the construction of gender.”

Occidental College—making the list twice for the second year in a row—offers Blackness, which elaborates on a “new blackness,” “critical blackness,” “post-blackness,” and an “unforgivable blackness,” which all combine to create a “feminist New Black Man.”

Border Crossings, Borderlands: Transnational Feminist Perspectives on Immigration is University of Washington’s way of exploring the immigration debate. The class allegedly unearths what is “highlighted and concealed in contemporary public debates about U.S. immigration” policy.

Whiteness: The Other Side of Racism is Mount Holyoke College’s attempt to analyze race. The class seeks to spark thought on: “What is whiteness?” “How is it related to racism?” “What are the legal frameworks of whiteness?” “How is whiteness enacted in everyday practice?” And how does whiteness impact the “lives of whites and people of color?

Native American Feminisms at the University of Michigan looks at the development of “Native feminist thought” and its “relationship both to Native land-based struggles and non-Native feminist movements.”

Johns Hopkins University offers Mail Order Brides: Understanding the Philippines in Southeast Asian Context, which is a supposedly deep look into Filipino kinship and gender.

Cornell University’s Cyberfeminism investigates “the emergence of cyberfeminism in theory and art in the context of feminism/post feminism and the accelerated technological developments of the last thirty years of the twentieth century.”

Duke University’s American Dreams/American Realities course seeks to unearth “such myths as ‘rags to riches,’ ‘beacon to the world,’ and the ‘frontier,’ in defining the American character.”

Swarthmore College’s Nonviolent Responses to Terrorism “deconstruct terrorism” and “build on promising nonviolent procedures to combat today’s terrorism.” The “non-violent” struggle Blacks pursued in the 1960s is outlined as a mode for tackling today’s terrorism.

Dishonorable Mentions

UC-Berkeley’s Sex Change City: Theorizing History in Genderqueer San Francisco explores “implications of U.S. imperialism and colonization for the construction of gender in 19th-century San Francisco’s multicultural, multiracial, and multiethnic” community. The course also covers “contemporary transgender, queer, genderqueer, and post-queer cultural production and politics” and “the regulation of gender-variant practices in public space by San Francisco’s Anglo-European elites.”

Cornell University’s Sex, Rugs, Salt, & Coal asks students to ponder the questions: Why are “oriental” rugs collector’s items? How did we come to keep salt shakers on our dinner tables? When did coal start replacing wood as a fuel source?

Hollins University’s Drag: Theories of Transgenderism and Performance analyzes historical, theoretical, and autobiographical perspectives on drag, including transgenderism and performance in non-Western cultures.

University of Colorado-Boulder’s Introduction to Lesbian, Bisexual, and Gay Literature introduces some of the forms, concerns, and genres of contemporary lesbian, bisexual, and gay writing in English.

Swarthmore College’s Peace Study in Action partners students with a local “peace” organization “to study its mode of action and develop a document or brief that brings useful peace research to the service of the organization.”

Swarthmore College’s Renaissance Sexualities explores the homoerotic, chastity and friendship, marriage, adultery, and incest.

Oberlin College’s first-year seminar, She Works Hard for the Money: Women, Work and the Persistence of Inequality, “tackles” price differences, occupational segregation, comparable worth, and other factors that supposedly uncover institutional discrimination against women.

Hollins University’s Lesbian Pulp Fiction examines “a literary genre that critics once deemed ‘trash’ and moralists commonly found ‘scandalous,’ but that formed a crucial part in the burgeoning canon of queer literature.”

I've actually taken classes such as: Gender and Sexuality in the Media, Gender Roles in Communication, Literature of the African-American Peoples, and Media and Advertising in Society. I found them to be educational on more than one level. For instance, they make the individual see things from a different perspective.....a perspective they may not have known to exist. They also allow a person to question what it is they have been raised to think about certain subjects and then form an opinion when presented with both sides to a piece of work.

Education is about expanding the horizons of your mind. Colleges do offer these courses for students who wish to learn something out of the ordinary. Does that make it unworthy of learning simply because it is unconventional? I do not believe so. In fact, I believe classes that deviate from the norm of conventional education sharpen the mind and the ability to think critically.

Also, it is important to note that classes such as these do not last more than a few years. At the University where I attended, a class that was offered to me as a sophomore was not offered anymore when I had graduated. The reason for this is because their was a lack of demand. Students have a say in what elective classes will succeed and which will fail.

As for the preface to the classes mentioned in the article, I find it to be objectionable. The first bold portion I highlighted is a garbage study because it is talking about Americans......not college students or college graduates specifically. As for the quote following the bold portion, I find this to be garbage as well. There are many majors which do not require a student to take more than 1 math course. For example, my degree in Communication Studies did not require a math course above what was required by the general education requirements. My degree in Business Administration, however, relied heavily on math comprehension but did not require additional courses in literature. Therefore, I find that study to be garbage as well. There are too many variables that were not taken into consideration for that study.

As for the quote by Jason Mattera, I find it untrue that professors wish to divide us based on gender, sexuality, face, etc. I believe he is misunderstanding the goal of these courses which is to make people study why these divisions are there in the first place......not to enforce them further.
 
I completely disagree. These perverse courses are merely the tip of the iceberg, albeit the pinnacle, of the kind of indoctrination that goes on in our universities today. Don't give me a bunch of baloney about "expanding the horizons of your mind." Education is supposed to equip people with the tools to function properly in society.

These courses explore, for the most part, either the deviant side or the divisive side of society, rather than the mainstream. The courses you described don't appear to reach the level of perversity or one-sidedness that this list attains, so I don't see how you have enough proper perspective to make a judgment.
 
I piss myself everytime I hear of some douchebag who says they major in "Peace Studies". Sounds like a productive career path! :lol:
 
fossten said:
I completely disagree. These perverse courses are merely the tip of the iceberg, albeit the pinnacle, of the kind of indoctrination that goes on in our universities today. Don't give me a bunch of baloney about "expanding the horizons of your mind." Education is supposed to equip people with the tools to function properly in society.

These courses explore, for the most part, either the deviant side or the divisive side of society, rather than the mainstream. The courses you described don't appear to reach the level of perversity or one-sidedness that this list attains, so I don't see how you have enough proper perspective to make a judgment.
So are you saying people who don't go to college can't function properly in society? Even if that isn't what you meant, I believe education and learning in an academic setting should entail a certain amount of provacation, don't you agree? I believe it is the parents' responsibility to equip their children with the tools to function properly in society.

The classes I listed may not reach the level of perveristy of the aforementioned classes in the article, however, there are classes where the goal is not to teach a subject. Rather, the goal of these classes is to make one critically think about a subject.

As for me not having proper perspective, I have all the perspective I need to make a judgement. Afterall, I did go to college where classes like these were offered.....not mandated. Also, the deviant side of human nature does need to be explored......look at psychology or sociology and statistics for that matter. Deviation is an important part of learning and it should be offered to students who wish to critically think about what causes it, what the impact on society is, and the reaction it envokes.

Again I say......these courses are optional. If there is indoctrination present, than it a voluntary process.
 
Well put, DLS8K. However, some would prefer to keep their heads burried in the sand and pretend that those with different knowledge of the world are going to bring it to an end, instead of celebrating how great the freedom to choose which is provided by this great country are. How naive.
 
DLS8K said:
So are you saying people who don't go to college can't function properly in society? Even if that isn't what you meant, I believe education and learning in an academic setting should entail a certain amount of provacation, don't you agree? I believe it is the parents' responsibility to equip their children with the tools to function properly in society.

The classes I listed may not reach the level of perveristy of the aforementioned classes in the article, however, there are classes where the goal is not to teach a subject. Rather, the goal of these classes is to make one critically think about a subject.

As for me not having proper perspective, I have all the perspective I need to make a judgement. Afterall, I did go to college where classes like these were offered.....not mandated. Also, the deviant side of human nature does need to be explored......look at psychology or sociology and statistics for that matter. Deviation is an important part of learning and it should be offered to students who wish to critically think about what causes it, what the impact on society is, and the reaction it envokes.

Again I say......these courses are optional. If there is indoctrination present, than it a voluntary process.

You are entitled to your opinion, and I happen to disagree. However, it is undeniable that 18-year-olds who are barely older than children will be drawn by no more than curiosity to the more prurient sources of information in colleges. It's like dangling a carrot in front of a horse. I have yet to see what value those courses bring to the curriculum as far as FUNCTIONING IN SOCIETY when compared to traditional subjects like math, accounting, political science, medicine, finance, government, and criminal justice, to name a few. It just looks like tittilation followed by indoctrination.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top