Most Americans "pro-life."

Calabrio

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
8,793
Reaction score
3
Location
Sarasota
May 15, 2009
More Americans “Pro-Life” Than “Pro-Choice” for First Time
Also, fewer think abortion should be legal “under any circumstances”
Gallop Poll
by Lydia Saad


PRINCETON, NJ -- A new Gallup Poll, conducted May 7-10, finds 51% of Americans calling themselves "pro-life" on the issue of abortion and 42% "pro-choice." This is the first time a majority of U.S. adults have identified themselves as pro-life since Gallup began asking this question in 1995.

qgpmcs1jxuwo2l6achm_cg.gif


The new results, obtained from Gallup's annual Values and Beliefs survey, represent a significant shift from a year ago, when 50% were pro-choice and 44% pro-life. Prior to now, the highest percentage identifying as pro-life was 46%, in both August 2001 and May 2002.

The May 2009 survey documents comparable changes in public views about the legality of abortion. In answer to a question providing three options for the extent to which abortion should be legal, about as many Americans now say the procedure should be illegal in all circumstances (23%) as say it should be legal under any circumstances (22%). This contrasts with the last four years, when Gallup found a strong tilt of public attitudes in favor of unrestricted abortion.

qg8phio020orbfpcihagma.gif


Gallup also found public preferences for the extreme views on abortion about even -- as they are today -- in 2005 and 2002, as well as during much of the first decade of polling on this question from 1975 to 1985. Still, the dominant position on this question remains the middle option, as it has continuously since 1975: 53% currently say abortion should be legal only under certain circumstances.

When the views of this middle group are probed further -- asking these respondents whether they believe abortion should be legal in most or only a few circumstances -- Gallup finds the following breakdown in opinion.

-trrvu0n2ec-mym1hguzfa.gif


Americans' recent shift toward the pro-life position is confirmed in two other surveys. The same three abortion questions asked on the Gallup Values and Beliefs survey were included in Gallup Poll Daily tracking from May 12-13, with nearly identical results, including a 50% to 43% pro-life versus pro-choice split on the self-identification question.

fmyujfx3z0stmsiariccdq.gif


Additionally, a recent national survey by the Pew Research Center recorded an eight percentage-point decline since last August in those saying abortion should be legal in all or most cases, from 54% to 46%. The percentage saying abortion should be legal in only a few or no cases increased from 41% to 44% over the same period. As a result, support for the two broad positions is now about even, sharply different from most polling on this question since 1995, when the majority has typically favored legality.

Republicans Move to the Right

The source of the shift in abortion views is clear in the Gallup Values and Beliefs survey. The percentage of Republicans (including independents who lean Republican) calling themselves "pro-life" rose by 10 points over the past year, from 60% to 70%, while there has been essentially no change in the views of Democrats and Democratic leaners.

r6nv3ssnjeo3e5rmjcp-wq.gif


j_lokucqe0ewmqfbanch1q.gif


Similarly, by ideology, all of the increase in pro-life sentiment is seen among self-identified conservatives and moderates; the abortion views of political liberals have not changed.

vvturtjyp02thyhmqhwoyw.gif


"Pro-Life" Up Among Catholics and Protestants

One of the more prominent news stories touching on the abortion issue in recent months involves President Barack Obama's commencement speech and the bestowal of an honorary doctorate degree on him at the University of Notre Dame -- a Roman Catholic institution -- on Sunday. The invitation has drawn criticism from conservative Catholics and the church hierarchy because of Obama's policies in favor of legalizing and funding abortion, and the controversy might have been expected to strengthen the pro-life leanings of rank-and-file Catholics.

Nevertheless, the swelling of the pro-life position since last year is seen across Christian religious affiliations, including an eight-point gain among Protestants and a seven-point gain among Catholics.

4auoozlleuscjeh5xxxwlw.gif


Gender Agreement

A year ago, Gallup found more women calling themselves pro-choice than pro-life, by 50% to 43%, while men were more closely divided: 49% pro-choice, 46% pro-life. Now, because of heightened pro-life sentiment among both groups, women as well as men are more likely to be pro-life.

Men and women have been evenly divided on the issue in previous years; however, this is the first time in nine years of Gallup Values surveys that significantly more men and women are pro-life than pro-choice.

hcruux-5lk6-zbv0hmk-wg.gif


lx0zsc1heuwiaymzmsrhsq.gif


Bottom Line

With the first pro-choice president in eight years already making changes to the nation's policies on funding abortion overseas, expressing his support for the Freedom of Choice Act, and moving toward rescinding federal job protections for medical workers who refuse to participate in abortion procedures, Americans -- and, in particular, Republicans -- seem to be taking a step back from the pro-choice position. However, the retreat is evident among political moderates as well as conservatives.

It is possible that, through his abortion policies, Obama has pushed the public's understanding of what it means to be "pro-choice" slightly to the left, politically. While Democrats may support that, as they generally support everything Obama is doing as president, it may be driving others in the opposite direction.

Survey Methods

Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,015 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted May 7-10, 2009. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points.

Gallup Poll Daily results are based on telephone interviews with 971 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted May 12-13, 2009, as part of Gallup Poll Daily tracking. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points.

Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones (for respondents with a land-line telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell-phone only).

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
 
In other words, you believe unborn babies should not be given a choice whether they get to live or die, and you do not believe all life is sacred.

A bit confrontational, don't you think?
You're not exactly going to draw anyone out of their shell with that approach.
Nor do you stand any chance or persuading someone to even examine their stance or position.
 
shhhhhhhhhh! Don't say that too loud.

Not wanting to get things person, I suspect you're making that post in response to some of the backlash you received. But you didn't simply state that you thought women should have legal access to abortions in certain situations- you expressed irritation that a convenience induced late-term abortion, that you paid for, cost more than the other convenience motivated abortions you'd paid for. And some people found that to be reprehensible. I think most people would understand why.
 
Not wanting to get things person, I suspect you're making that post in response to some of the backlash you received. But you didn't simply state that you thought women should have legal access to abortions in certain situations- you expressed irritation that a convenience induced late-term abortion, that you paid for, cost more than the other convenience motivated abortions you'd paid for. And some people found that to be reprehensible. I think most people would understand why.

I never said anything about "late-term" abortion, I just stated that abortion offers people options. My decision have proven to be the right ones, other would say I was selfish, or a "vile creature", but I am happy and living a productive life.
 
I had a friend ask me to loan her money for her abortion. No fuking way. I dont see how anyone can do it. Abortion is murder. Bottom line.

Were you the father?
 
I never said anything about "late-term" abortion, I just stated that abortion offers people options.
You're right, it wasn't "late term," you were speaking of an abortion at 5 months, at the very end of the second trimester.

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showpost.php?p=482322&postcount=6

I stand corrected.

My decision have proven to be the right ones, other would say I was selfish, or a "vile creature", but I am happy and living a productive life.
Then those things worked out well for you then.

I really didn't intend to personalize this. The thread is really about this new polling data that does show some interesting changes in the population. Perhaps it's because medicine and science given everyone in the public a much better understand of the gestation process?
 
Well this subject is bound to take on a personal note pretty quick. People on both sides tend to b pretty sure there right. The one problem I see with most of the pro-lifers is they only care that the child is born, they don't look at quality of life or some of the other factors. I feel if they talked more about birth control methods then their pro-life stance, we would have less of a problem to fight about. I also can't believe that you think that a women who was raped should be forced to carry the seed from that horrible incident, how can that be a reasonable suggestion in your mind?
 
I just feel like we as Americans should mind our own business, we should worry about what another person does. My old DS, SSG Robertson, use to always tell my basic class, worry about whats on your own wagon, and you will always come out ahead. I wasnt trying to make this thread about me, I just wanted to warn bsmith about the backlash that is about to come his way.
 
Oh yeah I agree with you, everybody should mind their own business, thats most of America's problems. You do your thing and I'll do mine, seems simple don't it?
 
Oh yeah I agree with you, everybody should mind their own business, thats most of America's problems. You do your thing and I'll do mine, seems simple don't it?

It would be nice if it was that simple, but it will never be.

Lets just for fun say the girl your with gets PG.
She doesn't want the child.
You view it as a life and want to see it born.
Whats the right thing to do?

For the woman to say this is my body and I will do with it as I want?
Or should you have a right to see the life you created?
This is just one example, there are many complicated problems with this issue.
 
I'm against abortion but believe that a woman has the right to choose..

It's between her and God and none of your GD business ....

You conservatives should figure out what the hell you want the government to do? Either get the hell out of our lives or interfere with them ... make up your mind ..
 
I'm against abortion but believe that a woman has the right to choose..
O.K.

It's between her and God and none of your GD business ....
You say that in a matter of fact way, but it clearly isn't that simple. If you conclude that there is another life involved in this situation, then it's not just between her and her God. There's a third party, an innocent life, involved as well. Right?

You're statement absolutely applies to issues of individual liberty. If she wants to smoke, drink, or some kind of body modification, those are clearly examples of what you're talking about.

But when you introduce the independent life to the scenario, I think it's undeniable that the argument made no longer works so well. It's not as simple as you just made it out to be. This isn't about getting your ears pierced anymore.

You conservatives should figure out what the hell you want the government to do? Either get the hell out of our lives or interfere with them ... make up your mind ..
Actually, I'd make that same argument to, what I'll just call, the political left in this country as well. For some reason, we seem to have huge segments of the population that seem to think that freedom is only focuses on "sexual freedom" but nothing else.

So let me get this straight- I can't ride without a helmet, I can't drive without a seat belt, I can't use my boat with life jackets, and I can't buy a car without thousands of dollars of "standard" airbags- but unrestricted access to abortion and late term abortions is mandated by the constitution? That doesn't sound reasonable.

The way I interpret it-
If the fetus isn't granted human rights, then the court has no authority to decide on the matter. The court should overturn Roe and send it back to the states to decide, and so that a political compromise or solution can be reached.
And if the court is involved, it should only be to protect the constitutional rights of the individual life that is dependent upon the court to protect it.
 
Lets just for fun say the girl your with gets PG.
She doesn't want the child.
You view it as a life and want to see it born.
Whats the right thing to do?

It isn't so much a "which is right", but "which is the lesser evil". Very few people who are pro-choice view abortion as anything more then a necessary evil at best.

For the woman to say this is my body and I will do with it as I want?
Or should you have a right to see the life you created?
This is just one example, there are many complicated problems with this issue.

What you end up having are competing values; "choice" as a social value and the right to life. The question is which one trumps and in which instances. Most people would generally say that a right to life trumps a right to choice in general and exceptions to that need to be justified. That is why you get arguments that life does not begin at conception. By discrediting the view that a fetus is a life, the debate between which value should trump and having to justify choice trumping life in the area of abortion is avoided.


The court has ruled that "choice" trumps (through equivocation of the term "due process" in the Constitution). The better solution would be to put it up for a vote in the form of an amendment to the Constitution. Either enshrine a right to have an abortion in some fashion in the Constitution, or specify where protections of life already guaranteed in the Constitution first come into play.
 
I'm against abortion but believe that a woman has the right to choose..

It's between her and God and none of your GD business ....

You conservatives should figure out what the hell you want the government to do? Either get the hell out of our lives or interfere with them ... make up your mind ..
Please explain to me how protecting the lives of innocent children and preventing wanton murder-out-of-convenience is somehow interfering in our lives.
 
Well this subject is bound to take on a personal note pretty quick. People on both sides tend to b pretty sure there right. The one problem I see with most of the pro-lifers is they only care that the child is born, they don't look at quality of life or some of the other factors. I feel if they talked more about birth control methods then their pro-life stance, we would have less of a problem to fight about. I also can't believe that you think that a women who was raped should be forced to carry the seed from that horrible incident, how can that be a reasonable suggestion in your mind?
Is it the child's fault that the mother is raped? Why should that child be murdered for someone else's crime? Two wrongs don't make a right.

As for your 'quality of life' canard, who gets to decide whether or not a child lives or dies based on expected quality of life? You? Some bureaucrat? Some unelected judge in a black robe?
 
You conservatives should figure out what the hell you want the government to do? Either get the hell out of our lives or interfere with them ... make up your mind ..

Care to have an honest debate, or are you gonna stick with making straw man arguments?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top