Murdoch shuts down news paper after cell phone hacking scandle

topher5150

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
3,600
Reaction score
6
Location
Grand Rapids, Michigan
ONDON (Reuters) - In a breathtaking response to a scandal engulfing his media empire, Rupert Murdoch moved on Thursday to close down the News of the World, Britain's biggest selling Sunday newspaper.

As allegations mounted this week that its journalists had hacked the voicemails of thousands of people, from child murder victims to the families of Britain's war dead, the tabloid had hemorrhaged advertising and alienated millions of readers.

Yet no one, least of all the 168-year-old paper's staff, was prepared for the drama of a single sentence that will surely go down as one of the most startling turns in the 80-year-old Australian-born press baron's long and controversial career.

"News International today announces that this Sunday, 10 July 2011, will be the last issue of the News of the World," read the preamble to a statement from Murdoch's son James, who heads the British newspaper arm of News Corp.

Hailing a fine muck-raking tradition at the paper, which his father bought in 1969, James Murdoch told its staff that the latest explosion of a long-running scandal over phone hacking by journalists had made the future of the title untenable:

"The good things the News of the World does ... have been sullied by behavior that was wrong. Indeed, if recent allegations are true, it was inhuman and has no place in our Company. The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account. But it failed when it came to itself.

"This Sunday will be the last issue of the News of the World ... In addition, I have decided that all of the News of the World's revenue this weekend will go to good causes.

"We will run no commercial advertisements this weekend."

Steven Barnett, professor of communications at Westminster University, said he was "gobsmacked":

"Talk about a nuclear option," he told Reuters.

"It will certainly take some of the heat off immediate allegations about journalistic behavior and phone hacking."

Tom Watson, a member of parliament from the opposition Labor party who had campaigned for a reckoning from the paper over the phone hacking scandal, said: "This is a victory for decent people up and down the land.

"I say good riddance to the News of the World."


There was no immediate response from members of Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative-led government, which has found itself embarrassed by the avalanche of allegations this week after it gave its blessing in principle to News Corp's takeover bid for broadcaster BSkyB.

It was unclear whether the company would produce a replacement title for the lucrative Sunday market, in which, despite difficult times for newspaper circulations, the News of the World is still selling 2.6 million copies a week.

One option, analysts said, might be for its daily sister paper the Sun to extend its coverage to a seventh day.

News of the World journalists were stunned. Anger may be directed at top News International executive and Murdoch confidante Rebekah Brooks, who edited the paper a decade ago during the period of some of the gravest new allegations.

"We didn't expect it at all. We had no indication. The last week has been tough...none of us have done anything wrong. We thought we were going to weather the storm," said one News of the World employee who asked not to be named.

The scandal had deepened with claims News of the World hacked the phones of relatives of British soldiers killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The military veterans' association broke off a joint lobbying campaign with the paper and said it might join major brands in pulling its advertising.

The British Legion said it could not campaign with the News of the World on behalf of the families of soldiers "while it stands accused of preying on these same families in the lowest depths of their misery."

Signaling how far the racy, flag-waving title has alienated a core readership already horrified by suggestions its reporters accessed the voicemails not only of celebrities and politicians, but also of missing children and crime victims, an online boycott petition had garnered hundreds of thousands of signatures.

The Conservative-led government had already backed a deal for News Corp to buy out the 61 percent of BSkyB it does not already own, and says the two cases are not linked. But U.S. shares in News Corp fell over 5 percent on Wednesday, though they recovered somewhat in a stronger general market on Thursday.

Formal approval for the deal had been expected within weeks after the government gave its blessing in principle. But it now seems unlikely for months, although officials denied suggestions that they were delaying a decision because of the scandal.

"The Secretary of State has always been clear that he will take as long as is needed to reach a decision. There is no 'delay' since there has been no set timetable for a further announcement," a government spokesman said. Some British media reported that a decision was now expected in September.

Critics, notably on the left of British politics, say giving Murdoch full control of Sky television would concentrate too much media power in his hands and risk skewing political debate.

Cameron has proposed inquiries into the newspaper and into the wider issue of ethics in the cut-throat, and shrinking, news business. Arguments over privacy, free speech and the power of the press have already stirred heated debate this year.

However, critics called Cameron's move to set up official inquiries a tactic to push the embarrassing affair far into the future. The precise form of those inquiries is still unclear.

Labor opposition leader Ed Miliband has called for the BSkyB deal to be referred to the Competition Commission and said that Brooks, Murdoch's most senior British newspaper executive, should quit: "The prime minister has a very close relationship with a number of the people involved in this," said Miliband.

"He should ignore those relationships and come out and say the right thing because that is what the country expects."

So far, Murdoch has said he will stand by Brooks, 43, who edited the paper from 2000 to 2003, when some of the gravest cases of phone hacking are alleged to have taken place. She is a also a regular guest of the prime minister, and enjoys good relations with previous Labor leaders in power until last year.

Senior politicians from all parties, including Cameron and Miliband, rubbed shoulders with Murdoch, Brooks and other News Corp executives at Murdoch's exclusive annual summer party last month, underlining the power his organization wields.

Both Miliband and Cameron chose former News International employees as media advisers, although Cameron's choice of Andy Coulson, who succeeded Brooks as News of the World editor, has caused the prime minister the more obvious problems.

Coulson quit the paper over the first hacking case in 2007 and went to work as Cameron's spokesman. He resigned from the prime minister's office in January as police reopened inquiries.

The main accusations are that journalists, or their hired investigators, took advantage of often limited security on mobile phone voicemail boxes to listen in to messages left for celebrities, politicians or people involved in major stories.

Disclosure that the practice involved victims of crime came when police said a private detective working for the News of the World in 2002 hacked into messages left on the phone of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler while police were still looking for her.

Police have also been criticized over allegations officers took money from the News of the World for information. London's Evening Standard newspaper said on Thursday that police officers took more than 100,000 pounds ($160,000) in payments from senior journalists and executives at the paper.

Analysts believe the global Murdoch empire, which includes Fox television and the Wall Street Journal, can weather a storm of reproach from advertisers, readers and politicians in Britain -- though there were signs of international ramifications.

In Murdoch's native Australia, the leader of the Greens party said he wants the government to examine the ramifications on Australia of the phone hacking scandal.

The secretary general of the Council of Europe, Thorbjorn Jagland, said it was concerned by allegations of breaches of privacy. He said: "Governments need to act resolutely to fight and to prevent violations of this fundamental right, whilst actively protecting and promoting freedom of speech."


http://news.yahoo.com/uk-soldiers-targeted-murdoch-phone-hacking-scandal-report-030337129.html
 
Rupert Murdoch slaps himself on wrist

http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1021572--olive-rupert-murdoch-slaps-himself-on-wrist?bn=1

Well, good riddance. “Screws of the World” soon will no longer be with us. Rupert Murdoch will sacrifice his 168-year-old sensationalist British tabloid News of the World with a last edition this Sunday on the altar of sparing himself the kind of searing scrutiny the sensationalist NOTW inflicted on others.
The curse of journalism that is Rupert Keith Murdoch, now 80, will carry on as before, along with NOTW’s Murdoch stablemates The Sun (U.K.), the New York Post and Fox News.
Worse, Murdoch’s empire has just bettered its chances of securing U.K. government sanction to acquire a lucrative stranglehold on British private broadcasting with his planned purchase of satellite broadcaster BSkyB.
That deal is no longer jeopardized by a widening probe into NOTW’s dubious “news” gathering practices. The probe, which the U.K. government joined this week, will now be an autopsy. That corpses don’t talk has made the abrupt disappearance of witnesses a means of dodging punishment since the Borgias.
Morally vacant to the end, Murdoch has opted for tainting the entire staff of NOTW and ignoring the example set by the Tokyo Electric Power CEO who quit over the crisis at Tepco’s crippled Fukushima nuclear plant.

The News of the World scandal sheet, Murdoch’s first Fleet Street purchase in 1969, was a motherlode of profits to finance the vastly larger Murdoch empire to come. In its malignant opinion-shaping, NOTW preyed for decades on society’s least advantaged.
NOTW blared from its front pages exaggerated and fictitious tales of rampant welfare fraud, supposed government boondoggles and alleged corruption among public-spirited community leaders (many of whom, but too late in the day, won libel suits against the paper).
Murdoch’s first major paper outside his native Australia thus succeeded in demonizing the poor, the government and advances in social justice, from affordable housing to a compassionate embrace of refugees. It did this by stoking the public’s basest instincts, as the Sun, the Post and “Faux News” will continue to do long after this Sunday.
A veneer of exposing genuinely questionable behaviour among assorted British royals, Hollywood starlets and Pakistani soccer players was a convenient cover for the NOTW’s unrelenting assault on social progress in all forms.
A conspicuous example is the transformation by the Post and Fox News of a compassionate ObamaCare provision into “death panels” — the distorted label pinned on a government proposal to pay for end-of-life consultations between loved ones and terminally ill patients. Typically, that cruel canard was manufactured elsewhere — by Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin — and only became a widespread “truth” with 24/7 dissemination by the Murdoch media.
Murdoch’s loud contrition Thursday over the NOTW’s “lack of accountability” is deeply cynical.
NOTW’s practice of spying on private lives and paying corrupt cops for phone and email transcripts has been a simmering U.K. scandal for years, contentedly overseen by Murdoch until NOTW finally slithered under the very low bar of Fleet Street seemliness.
Revelations this week that NOTW had, in its meddling in the police investigation of a slain 13-year-old British girl, needlessly anguished the girl’s parents by giving them false hope that their daughter might still be alive provoked a British government inquiry into NOTW’s practices.
On Wednesday it was further revealed that NOTW allegedly had gone still further, invading the privacy of Britain’s war dead and their families.
It was suddenly imperative that NOTW die to save Murdoch himself.
Murdoch is famously a hands-on proprietor. His dictates to NOTW editors would have surfaced in probes not only by the British government but also underway among Murdoch’s Fleet Street rivals. Since a Murdoch impatient for results ceaselessly rotates top managers among his properties, the trail would have led to Murdoch executives at News Corp.’s Wall Street Journal, 20th Century Fox and all points between.
Still more cynical is Murdoch’s plan to donate NOTW’s revenues from its final July 10 edition to British charities. At a minimum, NOTW’s 42 years of accumulated profits under Murdoch’s ownership would be an appropriate penalty, a modest increase in the acquisition price of the BSkyB gold mine.
NOTW is no great loss to the $32 billion (U.S. revenues) Murdoch empire, in which broadcasting, cable network channels and feature-film production long ago eclipsed a fading newspaper industry as the buttress of the Murdoch family’s multibillion-dollar fortune.
Murdoch is hardly a prisoner to a reactionary political ideology required to assure stupendous wealth. His News Corp. remains overexposed to newspapers, an industry in long-term decline. He also bungled the hot social networking niche, having paid $580 million for a then-pioneering MySpace only to unload it recently for just $38 million or so after MySpace had been rendered irrelevant by Facebook and other upstarts.
Investors in Murdoch’s News Corp. have seen the value of their holdings drop 12.3 per cent over the past five years, compared with a 14.3 per cent gain in the Dow Jones industrial average. You would have done better with Walt Disney Co. (up 33.2 per cent) or the prosaic Canadian supermarket operator Metro Inc. (up 58.7 per cent). News Corp. revenues have plateaued over the past four years. Profits last year were 53.7 per cent below the 2008 peak.
News Corp. would benefit from a focus on business rather than advancing Murdoch’s political agenda. But such conversions are rarely given to octogenarian tycoons. Murdoch will continue as before, not only casually destroying reputations but working tirelessly to undermine popular support for those public policies that aim to rescue millions from grinding poverty, lack of decent housing and, in the U.S., unaffordable health care.
Somewhere, St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalists, is cringing. Again.

________________________________________________________________________

The fish smells from the head :rolleyes:
 
I'm in no way defending the people responsible for engaging in hacking, though I think you need to recognize the traditional lack of objectivity associated with the far-left papers that have been losing circulation to News of the World for years reporting on this story.

This is demonstrated by the article just posted here. The attack is based on the newspapers lack of support for wealth redistribution policies.

Isolate and destroy- in this case, Murdoch. Media companies he owns are viewed as an obstacle by this political movement. It's not even evident that Murdoch is a "conservative," Fox Entertainment is hardly a right-wing outlet, he's merely a business man who recognized an unfilled demand, in this case in journalism.
 
I'm in no way defending the people responsible for engaging in hacking, though I think you need to recognize the traditional lack of objectivity associated with the far-left papers that have been losing circulation to News of the World for years reporting on this story.

This is demonstrated by the article just posted here. The attack is based on the newspapers lack of support for wealth redistribution policies.

Isolate and destroy- in this case, Murdoch. Media companies he owns are viewed as an obstacle by this political movement. It's not even evident that Murdoch is a "conservative," Fox Entertainment is hardly a right-wing outlet, he's merely a business man who recognized an unfilled demand, in this case in journalism.


Murdoch is the "antidote" to the left leaning mainstream media and there's no way he couldn't have known about these shenanegins that have been going on for over 6 years now.
It's only now that for their own sick enjoyment they have despicably picked on families who have suffered that the depths of callousness have been shown.

Like I said

The Fish Smells From the Head
 
Why is Fox News, the NY Post, and the The Sun included in the 'article' you posted, and nearly every other one that's being released by the "left" newspapers in England and their "neutral" counterparts like the NY Times in the U.S?

Does Fox News, The Sun, or the NY Post have anything to do with the News of the World other than the corporation that owns them? According to your article, they share the same editorial opinion that is resistant to centralized government, socialism, and wealth redistribution.

So is this outrage the justified outrage that a handful of 'journalists' violated the privacy of other citizens in order to get the scoop on stories before the competition- by having private investigator and such hacking voice mail accounts, or is this another "crisis" that they don't want to go to waste?


Check the actual news of the world. This is going to be a difficult election for collectivists in the coming election cycles noting how such a philosophy is a failure and brought us in the Western world to the precipice of economic collapse..

Silencing the concentrated group of dissenting media outlets, or crippling them, is going to be absolutely necessary for political and social victory. Many of the political and social conflicts we are experiencing right now are international. Note, this hacking story is about 5 years old. You'll also see how they are using this story to attack the conservative party Prime Minister through the association of his communications director


In regards to Murdoch, I don't even think he's more opportunistic then ideological when it comes to business. Fox Entertainment is not "conservative" by any means.

But in the eyes of the international left, this is going to be used in an attempted death blow to, continuing your use of cold blooded analogies, "cut the head off the snake" representing the only dissenting voice in European media. Frankly, I don't think either Murdoch or his son had any knowledge of this action. To push these analogies to the absolute limit, applying your fish imagery, the head of the stinking fish works at the paper, blaming the smell on the fish monger is likely a mistake.
 
Why is Fox News, the NY Post, and the The Sun included in the 'article' you posted, and nearly every other one that's being released by the "left" newspapers in England and their "neutral" counterparts like the NY Times in the U.S?

Does Fox News, The Sun, or the NY Post have anything to do with the News of the World other than the corporation that owns them? According to your article, they share the same editorial opinion that is resistant to centralized government, socialism, and wealth redistribution.

So is this outrage the justified outrage that a handful of 'journalists' violated the privacy of other citizens in order to get the scoop on stories before the competition- by having private investigator and such hacking voice mail accounts, or is this another "crisis" that they don't want to go to waste?


Check the actual news of the world. This is going to be a difficult election for collectivists in the coming election cycles noting how such a philosophy is a failure and brought us in the Western world to the precipice of economic collapse..

Silencing the concentrated group of dissenting media outlets, or crippling them, is going to be absolutely necessary for political and social victory. Many of the political and social conflicts we are experiencing right now are international. Note, this hacking story is about 5 years old. You'll also see how they are using this story to attack the conservative party Prime Minister through the association of his communications director


In regards to Murdoch, I don't even think he's more opportunistic then ideological when it comes to business. Fox Entertainment is not "conservative" by any means.

But in the eyes of the international left, this is going to be used in an attempted death blow to, continuing your use of cold blooded analogies, "cut the head off the snake" representing the only dissenting voice in European media. Frankly, I don't think either Murdoch or his son had any knowledge of this action. To push these analogies to the absolute limit, applying your fish imagery, the head of the stinking fish works at the paper, blaming the smell on the fish monger is likely a mistake.


What they did was pretty scummy.
It's one thing to go after public people like entertainers and politicians but the line got crossed when they hacked grieving soldiers families.
If this happened in America there would be similar outrage.
This is why it came to a boil.
So are you saying that Murdoch is just an immoral opportunist with no core values?
He owns Fox news but also produces blue liberal type entertainment for the masses.
 
What they did was pretty scummy.
Whether hacking voicemails is scummy or not isn't in dispute.

So are you saying that Murdoch is just an immoral opportunist with no core values?
Apparently you're bored this afternoon.
I've said no such thing about Murdoch.

He owns Fox news but also produces blue liberal type entertainment for the masses.
And from that observation, you have concluded that he's an immoral opportunist with no core values? That's quite an over reach.
 
Whether hacking voicemails is scummy or not isn't in dispute.


Apparently you're bored this afternoon.
I've said no such thing about Murdoch.


And from that observation, you have concluded that he's an immoral opportunist with no core values? That's quite an over reach.


It's much more outrageously disrespectfully scummy doing it to soldiers and military families.
He's a businessman who wants to make money and doesn't let scruples stand in the way.
He's willing to cater to both sides.
Fox News is there because there was an opportunity to be the conservative in the liberal dominant media and Fox entertainment is more risque and liberal going all the way back to Married with Children and the Simpsons as well as it's current crop of shows.
Conservative views sell as news information but generally don't sell as entertainment.
 
It's much more outrageously disrespectfully scummy doing it to soldiers and military families.
You keep repeating this point, but it's not in dispute.
And they should all be prosecuted for their crimes.

When it was revealed the scope of the voice mail message hacks was wider than anticipated, Murdoch pulled the plug on the paper. Is there some evidence that he condoned such actions? This would have been like blaming Michael Eisner for something that happened at Disney World.

These different companies and divisions within News Corp are run by different people- this is why their collective cultures are so different.

He's a businessman who wants to make money and doesn't let scruples stand in the way.
And you make this statement based on what? And how does it apply.
You would appear to be implying the Ruppert Murdoch, involved in the day to day editiorial decisions of the News of the World, not only was aware, but gave the approval to the staff to hire P.I.s to hack into private voice mail accounts in order to scoop other newspapers. Unfortunately, all evidence demonstrates something to the contrary. The most damning, those understandable, thing is that he did damage control after this was discovered and he'd been assured by his staff that it was not continuing.

He's willing to cater to both sides.
And if that is the case, is that necessarily wrong?
And by both sides, do you mean that he's working with the North Koreans, or just people with different cultural view points?

Are you condemning Rupert Murdoch because you do not think he's on a moral crusade?

Conservative views sell as news information but generally don't sell as entertainment.
"Conservative" views do work in a news/opinion format, whether they work in entertainment is a much different story. The culture of the industry is what dictates the prevailing tone of the entertainment, not market demands.

An example of this can be seen when you examine the old example of Hollywood's tendency to create countless R rated, 'leftist' message movies that make no money contrasted with the family entertainment that makes considerably more. I'd argue that most of Pixar's work has demonstrated traditional, or conservative values- with a few exceptions. The successful superhero movies are often viewed the same way.

The viability of conservative/libertarian entertainment is only constrained by the culture of the media.
 

Members online

Back
Top