No wonder Bush's approval rating is so low...

fossten

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
6
Location
Louisville
New Study: TV Networks Have Pounded Bush for Five Years

Posted by Rich Noyes on July 31, 2006 - 10:56.

For nearly all of his presidency, George W. Bush has been on the receiving end of mainly negative — sometimes highly negative — coverage from the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts, according to a new report from the Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA), a nonpartisan research group. The only time the TV networks gave Bush mostly (63%) positive coverage was during the three months following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and even then nearly four-in-ten on-air evaluations (37%) of the President were critical.

The findings are included in the latest issue of CMPA’s Media Monitor newsletter, which reached my (snail) mailbox on Friday. So far, it has yet to be posted on CMPA’s Web site, which appears to make this NewsBusters posting a World Wide Web exclusive.

The CMPA researchers examined network coverage of President Bush during various periods in 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2006. With the exception of the post 9/11 period in 2001, they found that the networks invariably saddled Bush with mainly negative coverage. (A separate CMPA report from 2004 looked at Bush’s coverage during that year’s election, and also found mainly negative network news coverage.)

In fact, according to the report, Bush’s coverage in early 2001 was so negative that even with the burst of positive coverage after 9/11, the networks that year still wound up presenting more condemnations of the President than praise. A summary of CMPA’s findings of how ABC, CBS and NBC have depicted President Bush during his first five years in office:

2001 (all) 61% negative
2002 N/A
2003 69% negative
2004 63% negative
2005 79% negative
2006 76% negative

Among the top topics of the networks’ presidential news stories this year: the war in Iraq, the aftermath Hurricane Katrina, terrorism, illegal immigration and the Dubai ports deal, with the war in Iraq receiving by far the most coverage.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can't catch a break from these guys.
 
fossten said:
Can't catch a break from these guys.

Never will.

We need more sources of the truth.
More conservative radio.
More conservative T.V.
More conservative Internet.
To offset the media's 'liberal' bias.
 
What you mean is, that Fox news should buy all the tv and radio media sources! Newspapers will then die
 
I'd settle for one of the three...ABC, NBC, cBS moving to the right.

I'd settle for one of the three...NYT, USA Today, LA Times moving to the right.

Slow and simple progressions to common sense.

Pew Research Center poll...

Most informed audiences....

282-56.gif
 
fossten said:
New Study: TV Networks Have Pounded Bush for Five Years

Posted by Rich Noyes on July 31, 2006 - 10:56.

For nearly all of his presidency, George W. Bush has been on the receiving end of mainly negative — sometimes highly negative — coverage from the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts, according to a new report from the Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA), a nonpartisan research group. The only time the TV networks gave Bush mostly (63%) positive coverage was during the three months following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and even then nearly four-in-ten on-air evaluations (37%) of the President were critical.

The findings are included in the latest issue of CMPA’s Media Monitor newsletter, which reached my (snail) mailbox on Friday. So far, it has yet to be posted on CMPA’s Web site, which appears to make this NewsBusters posting a World Wide Web exclusive.

The CMPA researchers examined network coverage of President Bush during various periods in 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2006. With the exception of the post 9/11 period in 2001, they found that the networks invariably saddled Bush with mainly negative coverage. (A separate CMPA report from 2004 looked at Bush’s coverage during that year’s election, and also found mainly negative network news coverage.)

In fact, according to the report, Bush’s coverage in early 2001 was so negative that even with the burst of positive coverage after 9/11, the networks that year still wound up presenting more condemnations of the President than praise. A summary of CMPA’s findings of how ABC, CBS and NBC have depicted President Bush during his first five years in office:

2001 (all) 61% negative
2002 N/A
2003 69% negative
2004 63% negative
2005 79% negative
2006 76% negative

Among the top topics of the networks’ presidential news stories this year: the war in Iraq, the aftermath Hurricane Katrina, terrorism, illegal immigration and the Dubai ports deal, with the war in Iraq receiving by far the most coverage.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can't catch a break from these guys.

What's mother say... "If you have nothing nice to say, it's better to say nothing at all..." To bad that doesn't work in the adult world.:rolleyes:
 
95DevilleNS said:
What's mother say... "If you have nothing nice to say, it's better to say nothing at all..." To bad that doesn't work in the adult world.:rolleyes:

WTF??? Did you just say something reasonable?

:invasion:
 
fossten said:
WTF??? Did you just say something reasonable?

:invasion:

Yes I did... Stop crying about poor little Georgie boy being treated bably, it's politics and he's an adult. Besides, his numbers are climbing, so he must be doing something right now.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Yes I did... Stop crying about poor little Georgie boy being treated bably, it's politics and he's an adult. Besides, his numbers are climbing, so he must be doing something right now.

I take back what I said earlier. You weren't being reasonable. You were mocking this thread.

Never mind. :Bang
 
MonsterMark said:
Most informed audiences....

attachment.gif

What a laugh. You know what the questions were?

http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=1068

The three questions asked respondents which party has a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives (Republicans); the name of the current U.S. Secretary of State (Condoleezza Rice); the name of the current president of Russia (Vladimir Putin). See Section VI, "Other Findings," for further analysis of the public's knowledge of these items.

With those kind of questions, one would pretty much expect Limbaugh listeners to get them right, huh?

What I find interesting is the "knowledge" of the Fox News viewers. Even below Larry King fans. Hilarious.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top