Ohio Jesus statue struck by lightning, destroyed

04SCTLS

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
3,188
Reaction score
7
Location
Lockport
Huge Ohio Jesus statue struck by lightning, destroyed

http://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/9786

A six-story-tall statue of Jesus Christ with his arms raised along a highway was struck by lightning in a thunderstorm Monday night and burned to the ground, police said.
The "King of Kings" statue, one of southwest Ohio's most familiar landmarks, had stood since 2004 at the evangelical Solid Rock Church along Interstate 75 in Monroe, just north of Cincinnati.
The lightning strike set the statue ablaze around 11:15 p.m., Monroe police dispatchers said.
The sculpture, 62 feet tall and 40 feet wide at the base, showed Jesus from the torso up and was nicknamed Touchdown Jesus because of the way his arms were raised, as though reaching out to catch a football. It was made of plastic foam and fiberglass over a steel frame, which is all that remained early Tuesday.
The fire spread from the statue to an adjacent amphitheater but was confined to the attic area, and no one was injured, police Chief Mark Neu said. The fire department would release a monetary damage estimate Tuesday, he said.
Travelers on Interstate 75 often were startled to come upon the huge statue by the roadside, but many said America needs more symbols like it. So many people stopped at the church campus that church officials had to build a walkway to accommodate them.
The 4,000-member, nondenominational church was founded by former horse trader Lawrence Bishop and his wife. Bishop said in 2004 he was trying to help people, not impress them, with the statue. He said his wife proposed the Jesus figure as a beacon of hope and salvation and they spent about $250,000 to finance it.

_______________________________________________________________

Can anyone say irony.
Natural selection?
Or is it a sign.

untitled.jpg
 
Exodus 20:4

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
 
Exodus 20:4

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

Hey welcome back foss!
We missed you.
There's all kinds of religious statues and imagery starting with the vatican right down to the local church.
What makes this one a graven image over any of the other ones.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but most people thought it looked cheezy and was an eyesore.
Since it was a biblical type event it's appropriate for you to dig up the relevant verses.:p
 
Hey welcome back foss!
We missed you.
There's all kinds of religious statues and imagery starting with the vatican right down to the local church.
What makes this one a graven image over any of the other ones.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but most people thought it looked cheezy and was an eyesore.
Since it was a biblical type event it's appropriate for you to dig up the relevant verses.:p
I've been busy, building a house and prepping some property.

What do you mean by the statement I bolded? And what did you mean by natural selection?
 
I've been busy, building a house and prepping some property.

What do you mean by the statement I bolded? And what did you mean by natural selection?

I just spent a couple hundred hours renovating my bathrooms.
I'm about done for a while.

You're the one mentioning the graven image

http://atheism.about.com/od/tencommandments/a/commandment02.htm



The Second Commandment reads:
  • Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. (Exodus 20:4-6
Most scholars believe that the reference to “graven images” was a reference to idols of beings other than God. It does not say anything like “graven images of men” and the implication seems to be that if someone makes a graven image, it cannot possible be one of God. Thus, even if they think they have made an idol of God, in reality any idol is necessarily one of some other god. This is why this prohibition of graven images is normally regarded as being fundamentally connected to the prohibition of worshipping any other gods.
_______________________________________________________________

It seems that what constitutes a graven image is a matter of opinion.

And my natural selection quip was just that.
Nature randomly selected this statue this lightning storm and it was destroyed.
 
I just spent a couple hundred hours renovating my bathrooms.
I'm about done for a while.

You're the one mentioning the graven image

http://atheism.about.com/od/tencommandments/a/commandment02.htm



The Second Commandment reads:
  • Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. (Exodus 20:4-6
Most scholars believe that the reference to “graven images” was a reference to idols of beings other than God. It does not say anything like “graven images of men” and the implication seems to be that if someone makes a graven image, it cannot possible be one of God. Thus, even if they think they have made an idol of God, in reality any idol is necessarily one of some other god. This is why this prohibition of graven images is normally regarded as being fundamentally connected to the prohibition of worshipping any other gods.
_______________________________________________________________

It seems that what constitutes a graven image is a matter of opinion.

And my natural selection quip was just that.
Nature randomly selected this statue this lightning storm and it was destroyed.
"Most scholars" don't believe any such thing. Some do, and they're wrong. They also believe in dynamic equivalence - translating the Bible from what they think the writers meant instead of what they actually said. Your source isn't credible. Clearly the passage says "any graven image." That covers anything including images of the Biblical God or Jesus - neither of whom can be represented accurately since nobody knows what they look like. You and your source miss the point which is supplied by context - God wants to be worshiped by faith. Graven images remove faith and promote idolatry. And idolatry isn't limited to just graven images, either. Jesus once told a rich man he was going to hell because he worshiped his money.

Anyway, I'm still waiting to hear what your point is.
 
I live about 10 miles from that church and actually have a couple really close friends who attend there. Not everyone who attends there liked the statue I know that for sure.
But as far as a graven image, it is not an idol and no one prays to the statue. It was simply decoration and an attention grabber. My thoughts (any many others' too) are that the money could have been spent helping people vs paying for a decoration.
 
Anyway, I'm still waiting to hear what your point is.

Just commenting on some current events and the irony of God striking down a Jesus statue.
And good morning to you too :)

You're the alleged expert here.
I'm just posting what I quickly dug up on a google search.

I don't think anyone in their right mind would worship the physical object as opposed to what it represents.
The statue itself is not a diety only a representation of such.
 
Just commenting on some current events and the irony of God striking down a Jesus statue.
And good morning to you too :)

You're the alleged expert here.
I'm just posting what I quickly dug up on a google search.

I don't think anyone in their right mind would worship the physical object as opposed to what it represents.
The statue itself is not a diety only a representation of such.
I find it interesting that an atheism site is the FIRST hit on a google search about the Ten Commandments. Natural selection? ;)
 
How very neutral of you.

Ha ha.
It wasn't intentional.
I was just searching for a definition of what constituted a graven image and this was appropriate to the conversation.
 
There are some interesting dichotomies - for example, God commanded the Jews to make the Ark of the Covenant, which included images of cherubims. Clearly the intent was to make an icon rather than an idol. It does make for an interesting discussion. But equally clearly, the use of idols is forbidden by God. The question is whether or not a 'statue' is considered an 'idol.' Worship would be the key.

My own personal preference is to avoid representations of Jesus because the typical artists' conception usually has Jesus with long hair and rather effeminate, neither of which was the case.
 
There are some interesting dichotomies - for example, God commanded the Jews to make the Ark of the Covenant, which included images of cherubims. Clearly the intent was to make an icon rather than an idol. It does make for an interesting discussion. But equally clearly, the use of idols is forbidden by God. The question is whether or not a 'statue' is considered an 'idol.' Worship would be the key.

My own personal preference is to avoid representations of Jesus because the typical artists' conception usually has Jesus with long hair and rather effeminate, neither of which was the case.

The white bread Jesus is a representation our caucasian european heritage.

Most people need something they can relate to as an ideal and that's the reason for icons.

God could be represented as an infinite fractal geometric equation with all the moving changing colors and intricasies but only hippie trippers would relate to that.
Jesus was God and man so we have the god as man as a representation.
 
Not to start a debate or anything, but I would really question whether that was a church I would attend if I saw Jesus on fire in front of it. I'm not much for omens, signs or fate, but even I would feel there is some kind of message there....
 
Its ALL BS mind control man cmon Guys, lmao.
Sorry, your brush was so broad I missed what you were referring to, Geno. And by the way, if you were bashing Christianity in general, I can tell you that nobody controls my mind.
 
God could be represented as an infinite fractal geometric equation with all the moving changing colors and intricasies but only hippie trippers would relate to that.

HAHAHA!

Don't know why, but I found that statement humorous. ;)
 
Not to start a debate or anything, but I would really question whether that was a church I would attend if I saw Jesus on fire in front of it. I'm not much for omens, signs or fate, but even I would feel there is some kind of message there....

Especially if you were a...

hippie trippers
:D

I actually drove by this thing a couple of years ago - it is near Dayton... It was recommended to me - I asked if they had anything like the 'biggest ball of string' or 'two headed calfs' nearby - and this is where they sent me. I adore roadside attractions - I stop at every one.
 
Opening line from the Washington Post article...

"It appears God has sacrificed his only son.

Again."

Comments from the WaPo article:

- He should be back in three days.
- Act of God, according to the insurance company.
- Looks like Zeus is winning the war.
- Budda, Mohammed, Moses, Zeus and Shiva are all sitting at a table across from Jesus laughing right now.
- Obama will blame it on the previous administration then address the issue 57 days later.
- Torchdown Jesus
- Note to self: When constructing six-story statues, do not use styrofoam and fiberglass covering steel as sculpture media.
- How could God allow this?
- Due to budget restrictions in heaven, Satan has been put in charge of all lightning strikes.
- This once again goes to show; God hates conductors
- This has got to be the coolest marketing strategy for the upcoming Thor movie evar!
- God has sense of humor. Look at the platypus.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top