Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'

Joeychgo

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
6,044
Reaction score
193
Location
Chicago, IL
Ok, this has got to be one of the dumbest things ive read in a long time.



Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'
http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html


(CBS 5) BERKELEY A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.

Gay community leaders in California said Friday that they found the notion of a "gay bomb" both offensive and almost laughable at the same time.

"Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction," said Geoff Kors of Equality California. "So, it's just offensive that they think by turning people gay that the other military would be incapable of doing their job. And its absurd because there's so much medical data that shows that sexual orientation is immutable and cannot be changed."
 
They can't be really think about that? can they? made me crack up though :D
 
I don't see a problem with it...

It's also like developing a "brown note" so that the entire enemy army craps their pants simultaneously.

Excellent Psy-op. Demoralize and disorganize the enemy.

The idea isn't that everyone becomes effeminate and leaves the front line to watch show tunes and decorate rooms, but that they all get into butsecs and then have to deal with the psychological and emotional consequences of the break down.
 
Not a good idea. Would promote spread of disease, the aftermath of which could be costly. Better to develop something that causes temporary blindness. (just my 2 cents)
 
Not a good idea. Would promote spread of disease, the aftermath of which could be costly. Better to develop something that causes temporary blindness. (just my 2 cents)

Why would you care if there was an outbreak of anal warts and herpes among the bad guys?
 
Because once the war is won or whatever, these things would need to be addressed. You wouldnt want nasty stuff like hiv or other stds spreading to innocent civilians in the years to follow. Thats why i suggested a short term fix, minimum fuss and max result! lol.
 
Because once the war is won or whatever, these things would need to be addressed. You wouldnt want nasty stuff like hiv or other stds spreading to innocent civilians in the years to follow. Thats why i suggested a short term fix, minimum fuss and max result! lol.

Hippie
 
frizz1.gif
 
Not a good idea. Would promote spread of disease, the aftermath of which could be costly. Better to develop something that causes temporary blindness. (just my 2 cents)

Meh, still better than the A-Bomb. Y'know, this wouldn't be so believable if it wasn't on CBS *and* linked from Snopes.
 
I don't see a problem with it...

It's also like developing a "brown note" so that the entire enemy army craps their pants simultaneously.

Excellent Psy-op. Demoralize and disorganize the enemy.

The idea isn't that everyone becomes effeminate and leaves the front line to watch show tunes and decorate rooms, but that they all get into butsecs and then have to deal with the psychological and emotional consequences of the break down.

I thought the purpose would be to cause the enemy to suddenly be so concerned about their uniforms matching correctly and being properly pressed that they couldn't fight unless everything was perfectly arranged.
 
I don't see a problem with it...

It's also like developing a "brown note" so that the entire enemy army craps their pants simultaneously.

Excellent Psy-op. Demoralize and disorganize the enemy.

The idea isn't that everyone becomes effeminate and leaves the front line to watch show tunes and decorate rooms, but that they all get into butsecs and then have to deal with the psychological and emotional consequences of the break down.

As ridiculous as this story is, it'd have the opposite effect... if someone you already wanted to kill, gave you a drug that made you uncontrollably want to bugger or be buggered by the soldier next to you, you wouldn't want to kill them first and foremost after said acts?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top