OldRelayer
LVC Member
We are looking at a 2001 Continental. We have two cars now, a 98 Lincoln Mark VIII that is used in the good months here in Maine and a 87 Olds 88 which is our winter car. There are a lot of ways for us to go, keep the Mark and upgrade the winter car or with the Continental we could replace both cars. We love the Mark and it would be hard to replace it both practically and emotionally but it is getting old and it just might be the thing to do, not that we are having problems yet but at 110k they can't be far off. We are looking at a this 2001 with 63kmiles for about $9k. I guess that is an ok price and I think we could get better than $5k for both cars so the net would be to terrible.
Ok my questions. I worked at a Ford dealership and had my Lincoln serviced there. Their top Mechanic wasn't keen on Lincolns but didn't mind working on the Mark but told me never get a Continetal, he hated them for some reason. As I look at the information available about the reliability of the Mark, Towncar and Continental, the Mark and Continetal are about the same and the one with the lower score is actually the Towncar which surprised me. We have had 5 Marks and I always read how poor they were for repairs and we have never found that to be so, we hardly put anything into them, except for ball joints and that is more a problem with Maine roads than the car. What should I expect with the Continental from your experience?
When the Mark was new it got almost 24 mpg average and now almost 22 which isn't so bad for a big car. I read that the Continetal with basically the same engine with a tad less HP gets 16, that can't be right. I am thinking it would be closer to 25 or 26, what is your experience. My 88 Mark VII with Moly Black Gold would get a tad under 30, which was great and even normally about 25. That was a 302 rated at 225 hp, really nice engine, it didn't work nearly as hard as the 4.6, which sounds more like a rubber band airplane to me, wound up tight.
We are also looking at a 2001 Towncar touring edition, which is closer I think to the Mark in some ways, but that seems like s stupid move, would still need a winter car. On the other hand nothing like a rear drive in the summer.
Thanks
Barry
Ok my questions. I worked at a Ford dealership and had my Lincoln serviced there. Their top Mechanic wasn't keen on Lincolns but didn't mind working on the Mark but told me never get a Continetal, he hated them for some reason. As I look at the information available about the reliability of the Mark, Towncar and Continental, the Mark and Continetal are about the same and the one with the lower score is actually the Towncar which surprised me. We have had 5 Marks and I always read how poor they were for repairs and we have never found that to be so, we hardly put anything into them, except for ball joints and that is more a problem with Maine roads than the car. What should I expect with the Continental from your experience?
When the Mark was new it got almost 24 mpg average and now almost 22 which isn't so bad for a big car. I read that the Continetal with basically the same engine with a tad less HP gets 16, that can't be right. I am thinking it would be closer to 25 or 26, what is your experience. My 88 Mark VII with Moly Black Gold would get a tad under 30, which was great and even normally about 25. That was a 302 rated at 225 hp, really nice engine, it didn't work nearly as hard as the 4.6, which sounds more like a rubber band airplane to me, wound up tight.
We are also looking at a 2001 Towncar touring edition, which is closer I think to the Mark in some ways, but that seems like s stupid move, would still need a winter car. On the other hand nothing like a rear drive in the summer.
Thanks
Barry