MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
are probably doing this right now after the seeing the Florida primary numbers come in at a whopping 3%.
Once again you missed the point.But once again you show real class by making fun of people who seriously support their candidate. Nice job.
So you'd rather that he flip flop and pander, something Romney has done with abortion? Conservatives have been hoodwinked into ignoring the increasingly more important domestic problems in favor of making Iraq the singular issue of this election.#3) He refuses to modify his foreign policy stance so why would anyone take him seriously on his other stances?
Again, calling for pandering? He tones it down and he gets mocked by the other childish candidates. Sometimes I wonder if kindergarten is in session when I watch those things. I'm not impressed with their stupid jokes.#5) I'm looking forward to Ron Paul making an even bigger a$$ of himsewlf at the next debate. Instead of toning it down and picking up support, he'll crank up the volume and scare everyone who was listening away.
Yet Ron Paul abides by the rules by taking up only his allotted time for answering questions while EVERY OTHER CANDIDATE bloviates and hogs the time, demanding to speak and respond to every little comment, TALKING LOUDLY OVER RON PAUL, literally interrupting him en masse so that he's drowned out and can't finish his answers, and this doesn't sicken you? Take off the blinders.But all the Paulies will be there hooting and hollering in the stands, ignoring the rules of the forum, of course, because rules don't apply to them.
I'd rather he get over his biggest weakness and admit that his strategy of pulling out of the world might harm the U.S.A. more than help.So you'd rather that he flip flop and pander,
I am not impressed with the format either. It is all about sound-bites. Even when they are debating. You either play the game or you get rolled-over.Again, calling for pandering? He tones it down and he gets mocked by the other childish candidates. Sometimes I wonder if kindergarten is in session when I watch those things. I'm not impressed with their stupid jokes. .
Again, I don't throw out the baby with the bath water. I'd rather have any Republican, even a RINO, as compared to the beating the Country will take with Dem Pres and Congress. But maybe if the HillBilly or Osama get in, America will hand us back the House and Senate to keep them in check.Got news for you, Romney's gun stance and insane healthcare ideas will cost him the general. I won't vote for him and thousands (millions?) of other gun owners won't either. Take a lesson from Clinton's 1994 AWB and healthcare debacle, cost him the Congress. See any parallels here?.
I agree. He is polite. But the guy is wasting one of the greatest opportunities to get his message out. Instead of going for it all and getting nothing, settle for a piece at a time. That is what liberals are doing and that is why they are winning and have been winning for decades.Yet Ron Paul abides by the rules by taking up only his allotted time for answering questions while EVERY OTHER CANDIDATE bloviates and hogs the time, demanding to speak and respond to every little comment, TALKING LOUDLY OVER RON PAUL, literally interrupting him en masse so that he's drowned out and can't finish his answers, and this doesn't sicken you? Take off the blinders.
Refusing to conquer every country that looks at us sideways is not the same as pulling out of the world. I disagree with your premise and your phraseology. Your umbrella phrases are not getting past my truth filters; sorry, nice attempt at falsely framing the issue.I'd rather he get over his biggest weakness and admit that his strategy of pulling out of the world might harm the U.S.A. more than help.
I could use the same logic with Ron Paul. His domestic policies are beyond refutation and there is insufficient evidence that his foreign policy will hurt the country. He is far more conservative than the remaining candidates. The only one who came close was Fred, and even he's an establishment guy.Again, I don't throw out the baby with the bath water. I'd rather have any Republican, even a RINO, as compared to the beating the Country will take with Dem Pres and Congress. But maybe if the HillBilly or Osama get in, America will hand us back the House and Senate to keep them in check.
Spoken like a true compromiser. No true conservative talks like that. If something's right it's right, and compromising is defeat. Better to get beaten than to give ground that you can never make up. At least that way your conscience is clear.I agree. He is polite. But the guy is wasting one of the greatest opportunities to get his message out. Instead of going for it all and getting nothing, settle for a piece at a time. That is what liberals are doing and that is why they are winning and have been winning for decades.
The dignity of man is not shattered in a single blow, but slowly softened, bent, and eventually neutered. Men are seldom forced to act, but are constantly restrained from acting. Such power does not destroy outright, but prevents genuine existence. It does not tyrannize immediately, but it dampens, weakens, and ultimately suffocates, until the entire population is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid, uninspired animals, of which the government is shepherd.
"Imperial b.s.?" What are you talking about? You don't think that our 700 bases around the world constitute an empire? Somebody has to pay for that, you know. We're going broke and borrowing from the Chinese to pay for this stuff. Even McCain stole one of RP's lines last night, referring to borrowing from the Chinese. It's common knowledge Bryan, get your head out of the sand.How did the one-trick pony, I mean, Dr. Paul do tonight in the debate?
Guy shoots himself in the foot every time with his imperial b.s.