Should have left the charges at "FRAUD"

97silverlsc

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
953
Reaction score
0
Location
High Bridge, NJ
Rush Limbaugh Arrested on Prescription Drug Charges
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/u...&en=71ea39268baa51c2&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Published: April 28, 2006

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla., April 29 (AP) — Rush Limbaugh was arrested today on prescription drug charges, with his lawyer saying he has reached a deal with prosecutors that will eventually see the charges dismissed if he continues treatment for drug addiction.

The subject of a three-year investigation by prosecutors, Mr. Limbaugh turned himself in to authorities on a warrant charging him with fraud to conceal information to obtain prescriptions, said Teri Barbera, a spokeswoman for the Palm Beach County Jail.

The 55-year-old conservative radio commentator came into the jail about 4 p.m. with his lawyer, Roy Black, and left an hour later after he was photographed and fingerprinted and he posted $3,000 bail, Ms. Barbera said.

"He just kind of came in and he left," Ms. Barbera said.

Mr. Black said his client and prosecutors had reached a settlement on a charge of doctor shopping filed today by the local State Attorney's Office, which Mr. Black said would be dismissed in 18 months if Mr. Limbaugh complied with court guidelines.

As a primary condition of the dismissal, Mr. Limbaugh must continue to seek treatment from the doctor he has seen for the last two and a half years, Mr. Black said.

Mr. Limbaugh entered a plea of not guilty in court today on the charge and Mr. Black maintained his client's innocence.

"Mr. Limbaugh and I have maintained from the start that there was no doctor shopping, and we continue to hold this position," Mr. Black said in an e-mailed statement. Doctor shopping is when a patient illegally deceives multiple doctors to receive overlapping prescriptions.

According to Mr. Black, Mr. Limbaugh also has agreed to make a $30,000 payment to the state to defray the public cost of the investigation. The agreement also provides that he must refrain from violating the law in the next 18 months, must pay $30 a month for the cost of supervision and comply with other similar provisions of the agreement.

Prosecutors did not immediately return a call for comment.

They began investigating Mr. Limbaugh in 2003 after the National Enquirer reported his housekeeper's accusations. He took a five-week leave from his radio program to enter a rehabilitation program and acknowledged he had become addicted to pain medication. He blamed severe back pain for his prescription drug abuse.

Prosecutors seized Mr. Limbaugh's records after learning that he had received about 2,000 painkillers, prescribed by four doctors in six months, at a pharmacy near his house in Palm Beach. The investigation was held up as the prosecutors and Mr. Black battled in court over whether the records had been properly seized.

Mr. Limbaugh reported five years ago that he had lost most of his hearing because of an autoimmune inner-ear disease. He had surgery to have an electronic device placed in his skull to restore his hearing. But research shows that abusing opiate-based painkillers can also cause profound hearing loss.

Before his own problems became public, Mr. Limbaugh had decried drug use and abuse and had mocked President Bill Clinton for saying he had not inhaled when he tried marijuana. He often made the case that drug crimes deserve punishment.

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country," Mr. Limbaugh said on his short-lived television program on Oct. 5, 1995. "And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs."

He added, "And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."

On the same show, he commented that the statistics that show blacks go to prison more often than whites for the same drug offenses only illustrated that "too many whites are getting away with drug use."
 
Schadenfreude.

Your article is a fraud. I know what "arrested" means. Turning yourself in and paying bond isn't the same as "arrested." Your headline makes it sound like he was handcuffed and driven to the slammer.

The 55-year-old conservative radio commentator came into the jail about 4 p.m. with his lawyer, Roy Black, and left an hour later after he was photographed and fingerprinted and he posted $3,000 bail, Ms. Barbera said.

"He just kind of came in and he left," Ms. Barbera said.


What more proof do you need that the prosecutors don't have a case than that they are letting these charges go? They even waited till he got off work for him to come in.

What a joke.
 
I do find it amazing how liberals seem to take such absolute pleasure in the pain and misfortune of people they simply don't agree with.

The guy became addicted to pain killers after a botched back surgery. Yet, it's met with glee from the bottom feeders (base) on the left.
 
Another pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey gone bad for the libs.

You know I'm smilin.

Too bad Rush didn't take a mug-shot with his symbol of finger friendship prominently displayed.;)
 
I have no sympathy for this hypocritcal, hate spewing load of :q:q:q:q. That aside, judge him by his own words. ""There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995

he got off too easy. If it was you or me, we'd get time in the big house.
 
97silverlsc said:
he got off too easy. If it was you or me, we'd get time in the big house.

Wrong again. If it was you or me, we'd never have even been in the spotlight. Rush is being persecuted because he is so effective.

By the way, your quote is irrelevant, since Rush vigorously denies breaking the law.

Get a clue: The DA has NO EVIDENCE. He was in court months ago crying to the judge that he had no evidence. The NYT blatantly lied about this story.

You're blinded by your hate. I'll bet you've never even listened to Rush's show.
 
Pretty funny. My wife comes up to me last night and says Rush is in trouble again and just got arrested. I laughed and said, see, this is what our great media does in this Country. Lies and distorts EVERY story that either exists or they create.

I thank God every day that at least there is the Internet, where one can at least turn to for the truth.
 
ABC: Limbaugh Got Off Easy, Without Proof Paint Him as Intolerant of “Drug Addiction”Posted by Brent Baker on April 29, 2006 - 22:08.

ABC's World News Tonight on Saturday contended that Rush Limbaugh got off easy because he could afford a high-priced lawyer and painted him as a hypocrite for previously condemning drug users, but ABC didn't offer any evidence Limbaugh has ever denounced those hooked on prescription pain medication. "Rush Limbaugh cuts a deal,” anchor Jim Avila teased at the top of his newscast, propounding: “Was this drug suspect treated like any other Florida first offender?"

After a soundbite from Limbaugh's lawyer, Roy Black, who contended that “with anybody...addicted to pain medication, it is really unfair to prosecute them or to make some sort of a big case out of it. The idea is to help the person overcome the addiction," ABC reporter Jeffrey Kofman countered: "But Limbaugh himself has not been so tolerant of other people's problems with drug addiction." Viewers then heard an audio clip of Limbaugh from more than ten years ago: "The people who are caught doing this stuff ought to be sent away. They ought to be punished." What, however, was the “stuff” to which Limbaugh referred? Kofman did not specify in delivering his broadside, but if Limbaugh was condemning users of illegal hallucinogenic substances, such as cocaine or heroin, that's quite a bit different than obtaining an excessive level of legal drugs to control pain. Kofman also suggested Limbaugh bought his deal: “Limbaugh received the lightest of punishments. Criminal defense specialists tell ABC News that a man without Limbaugh's access to top lawyers would likely have seen a harsher outcome." Yet earlier in the story Kofman had related how Limbaugh "benefitted from a state program that gives first-time offenders a second chance." (Transcript follows)

Like Kofman, in Saturday's New York Times, reporter Jeff Leeds, who cited no quotes, issued an uncorroborated broadside which didn't differentiate between illegal mind-altering drugs and legal, prescription-controlled pain relievers: “Before his own problems with painkillers surfaced, Mr. Limbaugh had regularly told listeners that drug users should be jailed.”
 
Legal drugs for pain? Only in legally prescribed quantities, not 2000 in a 6 month period. I have listened to that blowhard, he sickens me with the BS he spews. They say the reason he lost his hearing was his addiction to the painkillers. To bad he didn't OD.
 
97silverlsc said:
Legal drugs for pain? Only in legally prescribed quantities, not 2000 in a 6 month period.
Let's see, 2000/180 days is...11 pills per day??? Oh, yeah, that's REAL EXCESSIVE. PLEASE. You can't even do math? Have you never had a doctor prescribe more pills than you actually use?
97silverlsc said:
I have listened to that blowhard, he sickens me with the BS he spews. They say the reason he lost his hearing was his addiction to the painkillers. To bad he didn't OD.
Wow. Talk about spewing sickening BS. Your hate is so venemous it's tangible. I'm sure glad I'm not you. I can't imagine what it would be like to wake up every morning and be that hateful and angry.

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Legally Speaking, Rush Won Big Time

James Hirsen, NewsMax.com
Monday, May 1, 2006

Despite the mainstream media's best efforts to portray the deal struck between Florida prosecutors and Rush Limbaugh in the most negative light, the fact is it was a huge victory for the mega talk-show host.

Back in 2003, a Ronnie Earle wannabe frittered away Florida taxpayers' dollars by engaging in a politically motivated investigation that involved alleged doctor shopping by Limbaugh.

The Left immediately began salivating over the prospect of convicting the conservative icon for a felony that carried with it a possible five-year prison sentence.

Unlike a plea bargain, in this legal arrangement Limbaugh did not have to alter the position he has consistently maintained: He did not have to admit to having committed a crime.

Typically, a plea bargain involves admitting to a lesser charge. But pursuant to this settlement, Limbaugh filed a not guilty plea with the court.

The plea affirms what Limbaugh has always said — that there was no doctor shopping. Limbaugh was required to pay a small fine. He had to participate in a theatrical walk-in booking. And, as a condition to the prosecutors dropping the case 18 months from now, he must continue with his treatment under the same physician that he has been seeing for the last two and a half years, something he planned on doing anyway.

Rush's attorney, Roy Black, did an exceptional job for his client by avoiding the risk of a trial.

When the dust settles, there will be no record of criminal prosecution, no guilty plea, no probation, no community service, no further obligation of any kind. This is an unqualified win for Limbaugh.

In order to allow the D.A. to save face, Rush agreed to allow himself to be booked. In addition, he posed for a Tom DeLay-style happy mug shot and was subsequently released, a small price to pay for the certainty and finality of the settlement.

It is not unusual for prosecutors to make a deal of this kind when the potential defendant is a first-time offender with no prior criminal record.

What is unusual is that it took so long.

After three grueling years, Rush can put the whole sorry saga behind him and turn his full attention toward doing what he does best.
 
Calabrio said:
I do find it amazing how liberals seem to take such absolute pleasure in the pain and misfortune of people they simply don't agree with.

The guy became addicted to pain killers after a botched back surgery. Yet, it's met with glee from the bottom feeders (base) on the left.

Could it be because of his comments and attitude towards drug abusers in the past? Don't you find it even a little bit hypocritical of him to condem drug users then he turns out to be a pill popper himself?
 
95DevilleNS said:
Could it be because of his comments and attitude towards drug abusers in the past? Don't you find it even a little bit hypocritical of him to condem drug users then he turns out to be a pill popper himself?

No more hypocritical than you guys, piling on him because he got addicted to something he was forced to take b/c of excessive pain. You are confusing breaking the law with human weakness. Nobody's perfect and everybody's a hypocrite.

Haven't you ever told your kids not to do something that you did as a kid? Doesn't that make you a hypocrite by your own definition? Just because we do things wrong doesn't mean we can't say it's wrong.

He admitted his addiction and got treated for it, and he's moved on. Bill Clinton, on the other hand (and for example), still hasn't apologized to the American people for the lies and disgrace which he foisted on the country and the office of President. But I don't see you guys cracking on him, ever. In fact, you people defend his actions. THAT'S hypocrisy.

I don't want to hear any more hypocrisy from you guys on this. It's ludicrous.
 
fossten said:
No more hypocritical than you guys, piling on him because he got addicted to something he was forced to take b/c of excessive pain. You are confusing breaking the law with human weakness. Nobody's perfect and everybody's a hypocrite.

Haven't you ever told your kids not to do something that you did as a kid? Doesn't that make you a hypocrite by your own definition? Just because we do things wrong doesn't mean we can't say it's wrong.

He admitted his addiction and got treated for it, and he's moved on. Bill Clinton, on the other hand (and for example), still hasn't apologized to the American people for the lies and disgrace which he foisted on the country and the office of President. But I don't see you guys cracking on him, ever. In fact, you people defend his actions. THAT'S hypocrisy.

I don't want to hear any more hypocrisy from you guys on this. It's ludicrous.

So should he apologize to the drug user's he condemned in the past? Since afterward, it's human weakness ya know.

And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up
R. Limbaugh

Maybe we should take his advice and send him up the river...

Too many whites are getting away with drug use...Too many whites are getting away with drug sales...The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too
R. Limbaugh

I've said it before and I'll say it again: RUSH = HYPOCRITE
 
David,

I've been avoiding picking a fight with you but your defense of 11 pain pills a day is ludicrous. I was there. I have a ruptured disk at L5-S1. I was a zombie on 4 Percodan a day and I'm a big boy, like Rush. Please, 11 high dose pain killers a day? That is not use that falls in normal ranges. He was an addict but he did break the law. I can sypathize with the addiction but I'm having trouble with the hypocracy of just this specific situation. I'm not calling Rush a hypocrite in general, just on his words, in this case.

BTW, I took his words to mead drug abusers of all types, not just illegal ones. Legal drugs do a great deal of harm, too.
 
Sorry, Barry, but you're WRONG. He did not break the law.

READ THE NEWS. It helps.

By the way, did you notice that he's moved on from this and no longer has a problem? Oh, I guess that doesn't matter. Because you hate Rush politically, you must attack him at any weakness you can.

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Tuesday, May 2, 2006 12:32 a.m. EDT

Rush Limbaugh: Press Reports Bogus, Drug Case Closed

Top talk radio host Rush Limbaugh said Monday that despite media misreports that had friends thinking he'd been arrested on new charges of prescription drug fraud, prosecutors had, in fact, dropped all charges against him.

"I have maintained from the start of this, folks, that there was no doctor shopping," Limbaugh told his audience.

He stressed that the plea he filed with a Florida state court "does not require that I admit anything, and so in the agreement I have not admitted guilt, and that's the news, not guilty, a plea of not guilty - no admission of guilt."
Limbaugh said he was "thrilled" to finally put the episode to bed, declaring "the case is closed."

The conservative talker said he was shocked to discover that the press had so distorted coverage of his not guilty plea that friends had thought he relapsed and was facing a new set of drug fraud charges.

After returning to his office on Friday, he recalled turning on the TV: "There's this news, 'Rush Limbaugh arrested on drug fraud!' I said, 'Where in the world did this come from?'"

He told his audience, "When you hear the word arrested, you think cops show up with a paddy wagon with shackles and leg irons and handcuffs and take me resisting out the door.

"None of that happened."

The media distortions continued on Monday, Limbaugh said, with a new set of misreports that he'd been ordered to undergo random drug testing in order to settle his case.

"I have news for you," he told his audience.

"I have been undergoing random drug testing for two years and seven months. I never know when they're going to happen. I have not failed one yet. Folks, I haven't even craved a pain pill since I got out of rehab."

Limbaugh thanked his audience and sponsors for sticking with him through the 31-month ordeal.

"We have not lost one business associate through all of this, and we haven't lost any audience. We've gained audience."

"It makes me feel humble when this happens, and so grateful," he said. "I can't describe it to you."
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top