Somebody's LYING...Anybody wanna take the Drive-by Media's word THIS time?

[fossten]

Outrage Building Around ABC's Speaker Hastert 'In The Mix' Scandal Story
Posted by Tim Graham on May 25, 2006 - 13:53.

On Wednesday night's "World News Tonight," ABC reporter Brian Ross claimed House Speaker Dennis Hastert was under investigation by the Justice Department in relation to the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal. In response, the Justice Department quickly put out a statement saying Hastert was not under investigation. This morning, MRC's Brian Boyd found ABC's "Good Morning America" wasn't backing down an inch, as Brian Ross reported:

"Despite flat and repeated denials from the Department of Justice, federal law enforcement officials insist to ABC News the FBI investigation of Capitol Hill corruption has widened to include potentially Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert. Officials describe the 64 year old Illinois Republican as very much in the mix of the corruption investigation, something the Speaker told ABC News he was unaware of."

This could turn out to be a very illustrative contrast between off-the-record anonymous leaks and on-the-record public denials. Is ABC or Brian Ross so perfect and unassailably objective that we can believe their anonymous sources more than the government here? Or can they occasionally display an overactive and perhaps ideological sense of public corruption at times? (Scalia's tennis, anyone?)

Over at NRO's Media Blog, Stephen Spruiell noted via Drudge that the Hastert team is growing angry, sending this letter to ABC News:

Dear Mr. Westin, Stephanopoulos, and Mr. Ross:

At 7:25 p.m., the Statement of the Department of Justice confirmed:

“Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department.”

At 10:21 p.m., you wrote:

“Whether they like it or not, members of Congress, including Hastert, are under investigation,” one federal official said tonight.”

This statement is false, and your republication of it after actual knowledge of its falsity constitutes libel and defamation. ABC News’ continued publication of this false information, after having actual knowledge of its falsity, evidences a specific and malicious intent to injure and damage Speaker Hastert’s reputation by continued repetition of a known falsehood.

We will take any and all actions necessary to rectify the harm ABC has caused and to hold those at ABC responsible for their conduct.

Please advise regarding who will accept service of process to remedy this intentional falsehood.

Very truly yours,
J. Randolph Evans
Stefan C. Passantino
Counsel to Speaker J. Dennis Hastert

ABC News maintained its anonymous "federal law enforcement official maintains that Hastert is "very much in the mix," even if he is not considered a formal "subject" or "target" of the government investigation. Spruiell scolded:

How could somebody be "in the mix" without being "considered a formal 'subject' or 'target' of the investigation? This is nonsense! "In the mix" is a phrase that is utterly without meaning in a legal context. The Department of Justice is not a bakery, Alberto Gonzales is not a bartender, and Dennis Hastert is not an ingredient.

 

[pepperman]

I use to like ABC news, they are no different than CBS, and this will blow-up in their faces.

 

[fossten]

Laura Ingraham Slams ABC’s Brian Ross For ‘Bogus’ and 'Shoddy' Hastert Report
Posted by Noel Sheppard on May 26, 2006 - 11:21.

As MRC’s Brent Baker pointed out Thursday, there appear to be some serious holes in a story reported by ABC’s Brian Ross on Wednesday’s “World News Tonight.” For those with short memory spans, Ross alleged that House Speaker Dennis Hastert is involved in a congressional bribery investigation. Though this has been fervently denied by the justice department, as well as Hastert's office which is demanding a retraction, ABC is standing by its report.

Well, radio host Laura Ingraham (hat tip to Expose the Left with audio link to follow) reported on Thursday that she received an e-mail message from somebody high up in ABC claiming that Ross’s report was “totally bogus” and “reporters in the press gallery were laughing out loud as the story aired on ABC last night.” Ingraham declared: “This is an example of an agenda driven story without fact-checking, and with shoddy sourcing.”

The e-mail message concluded (alluding to CBS’s embarrassing Memogate in 2004): “Maybe this will be Brian Ross’s Dan Rather moment.”

What follows is a partial transcript of this segment, along with an audio link, both courtesy of Expose the Left.

Laura: I got an e-mail from a friend of mine, who works at ABC and I won’t say who this person is. But she is very uh you know she is a very significant role at ABC. (Laura begins to read the e-mail) -

“Laura, You ought to come down on ABC’s Brian Ross this morning. I’m sure you’ve seen or heard his report about Hastert being under investigation by the Justice Department for being ‘in the Mix’ of the Abramoff scandal.”

(Laura comments) I don’t want to give give this other part away but…(Back to e-mail) -

"A friend has now told me that last night reporters in the press gallery were laughing out loud as the story aired on ABC last night. They all knew that this report by Brian Ross was totally bogus. Most of the reporters and the producer who have been actually covering this story, who are really connected to this story, knew of this so called explosive letter months ago and knew that there was nothing to it. ABC, I noticed is slowly weaseling out of this story, which with each subsequent update but still refuses to retract it. Maybe this will be Brian Ross’ Dan Rather moment.”