The Coffee Party Con

shagdrum

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
6,568
Reaction score
44
Location
KS
The Coffee Party Con
By Thomas Lifson

The new and much-publicized Coffee Party movement sports a fairy-tale narrative about a spontaneous uprising of concerned Americans appalled at the Tea Parties and determined to restore civility. The truth, easily researchable on the internet, is that plenty of left-wing establishment fingerprints are all over the birth of this supposedly spur-of-the-moment operation.

Professional leftists, who assert that they speak for the people, just hate it when the people manage to organize themselves to speak out against the Left, as in the prairie-fire spread of the Tea Parties. Something had to be done, and in this case, "something" meant creating the Coffee Party movement.

Of course, last spring, leftists like Nancy Pelosi were charging that Tea Parties were an Astroturf operation -- not a grassroots phenomenon, but something manufactured by the dark forces of the GOP. At best, this was nothing but sheer projection, a reflection of the mastery of Astroturfing by David Axelrod and many others on the professional left, and the assumption that Republicans would operate the same way. At worst, it was a deliberate exercise in the technique of the Big Lie.

Unlike the early Tea Party movement, the Coffee Party already has gotten an awful lot of favorable attention from the liberal media, especially given that it has no real message or track record. None of the supposed non-ideological spontaneity of the Coffee Party adds up. No thanks to the liberal media, we know that its founder, Annabel Park, is an Obama-supporter, filmmaker (she made one for the Obama campaign), and former New York Times strategy analyst. In other words, she's a progressive activist.

Ms. Park's staged and noticeably edited video, "Coffee Party: How We Began," portrays the Coffee Party as pure as the driven snow in which it was recorded. While mouthing left-wing talking points, she claims that it all began with comments she made about the Tea Parties on her Facebook page, and that it caught fire from there. The mainstream media seems to find the tale even more enchanting than Han Christian Anderson's oeuvre, and they have repeated the narrative with a straight face.

CBS News asked, "Is the 'Coffee Party' the next big thing?"

Taxpayer-subsidized National Public Radio wrote, "In just a few weeks, fans of the Coffee Party on Facebook mushroomed from a few hundred to more than 100,000 -- making Park the accidental leader of a political movement."

Left-wing blog Firedoglake called Ms. Park "the nonideological Coffee Party Founder who is a fierce advocate for democracy and has an unshakeable faith in Americans' ability to unite for the common good."

However, there are some awkward footprints leading up to the purportedly spontaneous birth and the emergence of the "accidental leader," who turns out to have lots of help. About the time of launching the Coffee Party, Ms. Park attended what was billed as RootsCampDC at the Washington office of a liberal teachers' union called the National Education Association.

The list of attendees reads like royalty of the progressive movement: people from the White House, Harry Reid's office, the Democratic National Committee, the Center for American Progress, Change.org, the SEIU, MoveOn, La Raza, Organizing for America, the Alliance for Climate Protection, etc., etc. This Astroturf camp for progressives included people from NPR, PBS, and Firedoglake. (Was everyone at CNN and CBS busy?)

Ms. Park was a presenter on the panel, "Coffee Party: 100% Grassroots/Netroots Strategic Response to the 'TEA.'"

The rest of its agenda is highly political, progressive Astroturf. Here's a partial list of its other panels:

Re-Engaging Generation Obama 101

What Is Leadership? Obama=Leader? Stalin=Leader? What is the difference between leadership and authority?

Infiltration: Worming your way into a Congressional Job

Win in 2010! Come Help us Create the Plan

How to Build a Progressive Start-Up

Organizing Jesusland?!

Queer the Census

But our issue is for everyone!! Challenges of non-partisan organzing

How progressives can shape the debate around the next Supreme Court nominee

Creating Green Jobs: Using community organizing to create an equitable & inclusive market

Don't Let Them Steal It: 2010 Sec. of State Races

Be All That You Can Be... Veterans & Military Organizing 101

Organizing People to hold Public Schools Accountable

How we raise millions of $ online for marriage equality in a state not named California

Causin' A Ruckus: Civil disobedience and nonviolent direct action

Financial Reform

Technology of the Coakley/Brown Race

Organize Your Workplace! Bring a union to progressive workplace

How to be a Media Star: Presence and Authenticity Media Training

Analysis of the Color of Change Beck Advertiser Pull Out Campaign

No doubt that at the panel she conducted, Ms. Park received much good advice on how to package the talking points she so faithfully repeated on her video presentation. She also was among friends with useful resources to both help create and publicize the "spontaneous" movement.

At great expense, and drawing on the resources of billionaires like George Soros, the Left has created a formidable galaxy of activist organizations that help groups like the Coffee Party get going with web design, fundraising, and other technical assistance.

Buoyed by the wave of free supportive publicity, fresh off last Saturday's round of organizing meetings, and no doubt assiduously collecting the names and e-mail addresses of attendees, Ms. Park and the Kaffe Klatsch are no doubt already manufacturing the next round of Potemkin rallies intended to fool the general public into believing that they are as authentic as the Tea Parties.

They and their media lapdogs are betting that the public is naïve enough to be duped. Before the rise of the internet, talk radio, and Fox News, they would probably have been correct.
 
Well, I agree it certainly isn't spontaneous like the 'tea party' movement initially was, it isn't grassroots in the same manner as the tea party either.

But, since I was contacted by them to attend a coffee house meeting this past weekend (I didn't), from what I could tell it is mostly made up by the same Obama youth/activists that came together in 2008. I think they were looking for a direction, and Parks provided them with one. Manufactured to look like the tea party - and make no mistake it is manufactured.

But, can a manufactured movement, that will obviously lean left and support Democrats work as well as a spontaneous movement that obviously leans right and will support mostly Republicans?

I thought they should drop the 'grassroots' thing and just go with Reuniting in 2010. The spontaneity doesn't matter, they had a good organization, and they want to get involved in the upcoming elections - it doesn't have to be like the tea party in that respect. They have the names and numbers - just work it like they did in 2008 and you should be able to mobilize and create similar numbers.

Does 'independent' America need grassroots - those are the voters that both groups are aiming for. Don't manufacture something, and get burned for it. I think the grassroots thing has been 'done'. You don't need to do it again. Appeal to what your strengths were before - the young, minorities, lower income families, and women. Those are still your targets - and they can mobilize just as well, if not better than the demos that make up the tea party movement. And they don't need a moniker of 'grassroots'.
 
If the Tea Party stands for less government and taxes and an end to unfunded government mandates then what does the coffee party stand for?

The public is vague about what the tea partiers stand for but have no idea what the coffee partiers are.

Even though the voters have severely restricted tax increases in California the government is mandated by legislation to keep paying government workers unfunded healthcare and pensions ad infinum.

When I see students protesting 20% tuition hikes I have no sympathy for their call to further dunn people like me to pay for their education.

They should protest the teachers and education workers who in California and New York are the true pigs at the money trough.

At some point there will be no more money to steal or borrow to pay unionized government workers.

I propose my half and half plan.
Send the bottom half of government workers home and make do with the other half.

The taxpayers are fed up with this government disease that has taken over public workers who self importantly feel their entitled to fat wages and free healthcare/pensions paid by private sector taxes just because they work for government.

Their wages should be deducted an appropriate amount to pay for the benefits they enjoy instead of ripping off the taxpayer.
 
Fox, thanks for admitting that the Coffee Parties are astroturfing.

I like 04's idea of sending home gov workers, but all that will do is jack up the unemployment numbers. Without actually reducing spending and taxes, unemployment won't decrease. In fact, Obama's spokespeople have already stated that they expect 9-10% unemployment as the new norm for the next 3 years.

Let's send home Congress and start over with term limits.
 
Let's send home Congress and start over with term limits.

Congress will never send itself home but they may have to eventually send some government workers home, like the school board is doing in Kansas because it's run out of money and credit.

e100312_varvel-pg-horizontal.jpg
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top