The Hammer can't take the pounding

TheDude

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
4,121
Reaction score
743
Location
Santa Rosa, Ca
Tom DeLay Steps Down As House Leader

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
Sat Jan 7, 6:07 PM ET


WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom DeLay, the defiant face of a conservative revolution in Congress, stepped down as House majority leader on Saturday under pressure from Republicans staggered by an election-year corruption scandal.

"During my time in Congress, I have always acted in an ethical manner within the rules of our body and the laws of our land," the Texas lawmaker told fellow Republicans in a letter informing them of his decision.

Still, referring to criminal charges he faces in his home state, he added, "I cannot allow our adversaries to divide and distract our attention."

DeLay temporarily gave up his leadership post after he was charged, but always insisted he would reclaim his duties after clearing his name.

His turnabout cleared the way for leadership elections among Republicans buffeted by poor polls and by lobbyist Jack Abramoff's confessions of guilt on corruption charges in connection with congressional wining and dining.

The race to replace Delay as majority leader began taking shape immediately, with Reps. Roy Blunt of Ohio, the GOP whip, and John Boehner of Ohio, a former member of the leadership, making clear their intentions to run.

Speaker Dennis Hastert, his own grip on power secure, said he expects elections to be held when lawmakers return to the Capitol the week of Jan. 31. That set the stage for several weeks of political maneuvering, and the possibility of a wholesale shuffle in the leadership lineup 10 months before midterm elections.

Democrats, eager to take control of the House in November, reacted to DeLay's announcement with studied indifference.

"The culture of corruption is so pervasive in the Republican conference that a single person stepping down is not nearly enough to clean up the Republican Congress," said Rep. Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) of California, the Democratic leader.

Added Rep. Rahm Emanuel (news, bio, voting record) of Illinois, chairman of the House Democratic campaign organization: "With the permanence of their special interest philosophy, a change in the Republican cast of characters simply doesn't matter."

Democrats must gain 15 seats in November to win control of the 435-member House.

At a news conference in Texas, DeLay said he had called Hastert, R-Ill., on Saturday to inform him of his decision. "Our success in lowering taxes, creating jobs, growing the economy and providing effective national security was helped by Tom Delay's leadership," the speaker said in a statement.

The 58-year-old DeLay, an exterminator before his election to Congress in 1984, said he intends to seek re-election next fall. "I plan to run a very vigorous campaign and I plan to win it," he told reporters in Texas.

The voters aside, his political future will hinge not only on the outcome of the Texas allegations, but on the future of the Abramoff investigation.

Michael Scanlon, a former DeLay aide and an Abramoff business partner, pleaded guilty in the fall to corruption charges. In court papers, the lobbyist said he had once paid $50,000 to the wife of another former DeLay aide to help kill legislation opposed by his clients.

DeLay has been a fixture in the Republican leadership since the GOP won its majority in the 1994 election landslide.

An outsider at first, he muscled his way up the hierarchy when he won election as whip over the hand-picked choice of then-Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.

When Gingrich nearly fell in a coup more than three years later, DeLay went before fellow Republicans at a private meeting and emotionally confessed his role in the plotting. He prospered politically, moving up to become majority leader, the No. 2 post, in 1999.

Contrition was never a quality he displayed to his adversaries — Democrats, outside interest groups and others who sought to check the advance of the conservative GOP agenda he promoted.

DeLay raised millions of dollars for the campaigns of fellow House Republicans, conservatives and moderates alike, earning their gratitude regardless of their ideology. He courted controversy almost reflexively, including his involvement in an attempt to force corporations and industry groups to hire more Republican lobbyists.

He rarely backed down.

DeLay was the driving force behind President Clinton's impeachment in 1999, weeks after Republicans lost seats at the polls in a campaign in which they tried to make an issue of Clinton's personal behavior.

DeLay's downfall began at home in Texas, when he led a drive to redraw the state's congressional district boundaries and increase the number of GOP seats in the U.S. House. He succeeded, but was soon ensnared in an investigation involving the use of corporate funds in the campaigns of Texas legislators who had participated in the redistricting.

Flashing his trademark defiance, DeLay attacked prosecutor Ronnie Earle as an "unabashed partisan zealot." He pledged repeatedly to clear his name and said he would reclaim his duties as majority leader by the end of January.

The scandal spawned by Abramoff intervened, though.

Within two days of the lobbyist's appearances in federal court last week, GOP lawmakers began circulating petitions calling for elections. Hastert immediately made clear he would not stand in the way.

`After the Abramoff thing we got critical mass," said Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who long had advocated new leadership.

While Flake is a conservative in a safe congressional district, others suddenly calling for change were more moderate Republicans who could face difficult re-election campaigns this fall.

New Mexico's Heather Wilson was among them.

She said three of DeLay's "former senior staff members have admitted or have been implicated in corrupt and illegal activities to get money for themselves by influencing legislation. Whether or not Mr. DeLay was involved himself or knew this was going on, he is responsible for his office."
 
fossten said:
LOL - :W to eleven days ago!!

:rolleyes:
Notice you dropped that pic of Delay displaying the total count of honest bones in his body. Not so confident about his innocence anymore?:D :D :D
 
Holy crap! You mean that human beings have the ablility to become liars and cheats even when they are supposed to be leading our country. What a wicked world...

Listen...if he's guilty then he's guilty. He's just another scumbag who took advantage of the system and got caught. If he's innocent then he's innocent and he should be allowed to resume his duties. But the attempt to use this as proof that all Republicans are corrupt is laughable. All we can do is keep an eye on our representatives and give them a good kick in the nuts when they try to take advantage of us. Republican, Democrat or Independent...a crook is a crook...
 
97silverlsc said:
Notice you dropped that pic of Delay displaying the total count of honest bones in his body. Not so confident about his innocence anymore?:D :D :D
He respected the wishes of the :admin who respectfully asked him to change it. Instead of giving me grief about it, he respected my wishes and fellow posters on this board and in this forum. I, for one, appreciate his good will and common sense to enact the change.

So I think an apology is in order Phil. :)
 
MonsterMark said:
He respected the wishes of the :admin who respectfully asked him to change it. Instead of giving me grief about it, he respected my wishes and fellow posters on this board and in this forum. I, for one, appreciate his good will and common sense to enact the change.

So I think an apology is in order Phil. :)

So why did it take you over 2 months to take issue w/ his avitar? Or is it just a coincidence you didn't have an issue w/ it until after DeLay's boat sank?

:bsflag:
 
MonsterMark said:
He respected the wishes of the :admin who respectfully asked him to change it. Instead of giving me grief about it, he respected my wishes and fellow posters on this board and in this forum. I, for one, appreciate his good will and common sense to enact the change.

So I think an apology is in order Phil. :)

For what? I asked a question.
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
So why did it take you over 2 months to take issue w/ his avitar? Or is it just a coincidence you didn't have an issue w/ it until after DeLay's boat sank?

:bsflag:
I took issue with it the day the avatar went up. I sent him a PM. He responded and laid out his position. I said fine. Eventually I felt it was time for him to make a change and he graciously agreed. Has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Delay or what is going on with Delay. I just got tired of seeing the avatar. We have some new blood in this forum and I felt it was time for a change. Just like I changed my Reagan avatar to the dumbass you see now. And I'll change it again when I get bored.

Man, you guys on the Left love the conspiracy theories.


Copy of PM sent by MonsterMark to David on January 14th:
RE: Delay avatar

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David, time for a new avatar if you don't mind. I'm kind of tired of seeing the Delay flip-off.


Unfortunately for you conspiracy guys, I deleted all my PM's older than Dec, 1 2005. My mailbox only holds 1000 messages and was getting pretty full.
 
97silverlsc said:
For what? I asked a question.
I just don't want Fossten to take a pounding because I asked him to change his avatar. He did it based on my request. Not because his boat sank or whatever. So I am asking politely that he not be lambasted for his decision to change the avatar. Simply a coincidence in this instance. Nothing else nefarious going on.

So the apology request was more along the lines of... Oh, I understand, the mod asked you to change it. Wasn't your idea. Sorry.:D

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTW, Deville, I really like the thread title. Made me chuckle just a tad.
 
That's ok, Bryan, I don't expect an apology from Phil any more than I expect him to start being right about anything. :D

Thanks for setting the record straight tho.
 
fossten said:
That's ok, Bryan, I don't expect an apology from Phil any more than I expect him to start being right about anything. :D

Thanks for setting the record straight tho.

No thoughts you'd like to share with Delay stepping down? I ask you specifically since you seem to be very knowledgeable of him and protective of his reputation in the past.
 
I think he is trying to do the right thing, but it's despicable that the Democrats are resorting to criminalizing politics since they can't win elections. The only reason DeLay is under fire is because he's effective, and the Democrats don't like it. Personally I think he should have stayed and thumbed his nose at the sore losers trying to tarnish his reputation.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top