The Leftocrats

This leftocrat thinks that BMW's and Mercedes Benz are AMERICAN cars!

Do any of you leftocrats want to help BARRY out here?


barry2952 said:
Facts are Vitas,

My ML-320 and BMZ-3 were both made by Americans, sold by American dealers and serviced by American workers. I haven't bought a foreign made car since 1988. Not that it's any of your business though.

Stuff it!
Click to expand...
 
Why are leftocrats two and a half years behind the curve? The keep scouring the internet for what they dream might be anti-Bush opinions, and they keep finding laughable leftists opinions, with no factual basis, about why we shouldn’t have went into Iraq.

The fact is we did go in. We are there. The murdering dictator Saddam was removed from power.
Free elections were held in Iraq. The anger of a small minority of Islamic extremists is being addressed at the core. Things are getting better by the day:

The Story You Haven't Heard About Iraq

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?t=15865


The issue TODAY is how do we move FORWARD, not how many times can a leftocrat scratch his rear end.
 
November 18th, 2005, 08:03 PM #29
Vitas
Full Member


View My Photo Gallery


Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 263 Quote:
Originally Posted by 95DevilleNS
Lol... This thread is titled 'Evidence that Saddam Hid the Weapons Emerges', so until that evidence proves to be accurate or false I have no idea what logical reasons you are referring to. Can you verify that this evidence is the smoking WMD gun in 'good faith' as you say? If so enlighten us and we can discuss further.

As for my previous thread, I do not know how more clearly I can make my opinion. This evidence isn't verified, so we wait.


Laughing out loud at you if you think that "finding" WMD was the only reason we went to war.

Doughnut?

Another funny post.
 
Vitas said:
Another leftocrat claim:

"By the way Calabrio, he did say that …. and that the it was Iraqi terrorist that attacked on 9/11. Go back and read the thread for yourself if you don't believe me."

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?p=123448#post123448

Does it get any funnier than this?

T-R-U-S-T me, says the leftocrat. -lol-
Click to expand...

Lol....I can see why most people just ignore you........ If advising someone to go read for themselves so they can make up their own mind free of outside influence if a leftocrat maneuver, I'm glad to be a leftocrat.
 
I forgot to mention, be sure to include Raveneyes, Mespock and JonhhyBz in this, I am certain they would hate being left out of this masterful and witty thread.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Lol....I can see why most people just ignore you........ If advising someone to go read for themselves so they can make up their own mind free of outside influence if a leftocrat maneuver, I'm glad to be a leftocrat.
Click to expand...

Most people would, at a bare minimum, be embarrassed about being caught lying. Not a leftocrat, it is just another day at the spin.
 
Vitas said:
Most people would, at a bare minimum, be embarrassed about being caught lying. Not a leftocrat, it is just another day at the spin.
Click to expand...


So I am lying when I say "Go back and read the thread for yourself...... "? Please explain how that is a lie, out of morbid curiousity I don't do the sensible thing and just ignore you.
 
95DevilleNS said:
So I am lying when I say "Go back and read the thread for yourself...... "? Please explain how that is a lie, out of morbid curiousity I don't do the sensible thing and just ignore you.
Click to expand...


Leftocrat, you were caught red-handed, lying. At least have enough class to take it like a man.
Or is that impossible, for a leftocrat? You have had over a month to simply provide a quote, by me, and a link, to where I said what you claim. Nothing. Now you continue to play kindergarten leftocrat games.
 
Vitas said:
Leftocrat, you were caught red-handed, lying. At least have enough class to take it like a man.
Or is that impossible, for a leftocrat? You have had over a month to simply provide a quote, by me, and a link, to where I said what you claim. Nothing. Now you continue to play kindergarten leftocrat games.
Click to expand...

Lol, I do not want to re-start that thread again... But I repeat for probably the 50th time, 'The original thread is there for anyone to go read and make up their own minds if they are interested .' If that is a lie to you, I think you should get yourself a dictionary and look up the word. I recommend Webster’s.

Don't you have anything better to do than scan old threads and ‘try’ to make people look bad? It's pathetic and makes you look like a clown.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Don't you have anything better to do than scan old threads and ‘try’ to make people look bad? It's pathetic and makes you look like a clown.
Click to expand...

No, they don't have anything better to do. The allegations in the article I posted that he pointed to above have been documented in many articles prior to that one and in greater detail. It's an affront to him because he is unwilling to admit that the Shrubbites in charge of the CPA might actually have been more interested in padding there own pockets as well as the pockets of the oil companies. It's easier to attack the messenger than address the issues, the favorite tool in the Repug repertoire.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Lol, I do not want to re-start that thread again... But I repeat for probably the 50th time, 'The original thread is there for anyone to go read and make up their own minds if they are interested .' If that is a lie to you, I think you should get yourself a dictionary and look up the word. I recommend Webster’s.

Don't you have anything better to do than scan old threads and ‘try’ to make people look bad? It's pathetic and makes you look like a clown.
Click to expand...

You are too dense for me:

Vitas said:
You have had over a month to simply provide a quote, by me, and a link, to where I said what you claim. Nothing. Now you continue to play kindergarten leftocrat games.
Click to expand...
 
Ok, genius, how do you enter into a CONTRACT with a goverment that is not in place yet:

"In order to make major quantum increases in oil, we need to have production-sharing agreements, but that has to wait until after the formation of parliament," Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Chalabi said recently.

A new parliament is due to be voted on in December.

http://www.lincolnvscadillac.com/showthread.php?p=134810#post134810

97silverlsc said:
The allegations in the article I posted that he pointed to above have been documented in many articles prior to that one and in greater detail.
Click to expand...
 
Vitas said:
You would think that we were all living in the same country...

Dissent is fine, it makes our country so much better for it, but when you see comments that obviously beg for OUR downfall in these fragile times you need to examine what their agenda is. And, clearly, they have an agenda.

Bush is doing a stellar job in handling the Economy under the extremely adverse circumstances that were given to him. The Iraq war was won long ago, now we have to deal with allowing the Iraqi people the ability to make the transition to governing and protecting themselves. In the meantime we are finding massive amounts of WMD, in terrorists and insurgents. When done, this will be the biggest and most important Revolution in our generation. Dealing with the hate of Islam extremists at the core.:
Click to expand...

There you claim that the WMD's were looking for in Iraq are terrorist & insurgents.

Vitas said:
What attacked New York on 9/11/01?.
Click to expand...

There you claim that it was Iraq that attacked us on 9/11 without actually saying Iraq. What else did you mean by this then? Hmmm...

Vitas said:
See, you have learned something new today. Terrorists are the equivalent of weapons of mass destruction. BTW they "said" they were Saudi's. Would you expect criminals to identify themselves??.
Click to expand...

There you make an arguement that they were Iraqis and not Saudi's like the 9/11 commission report states. To further solidify the above quote on who/what attacked on 9/11.


Ya, I am the one that’s dense, anyhow keep up this thread, it's at least amusing seeing you make a fool of yourself with your little witch hunt. Say what you will, I'm done here. :)
 
95DevilleNS said:
There you claim that the WMD's were looking for in Iraq are terrorist & insurgents.
Click to expand...

That is not a complete sentence.

95DevilleNS said:
There you claim that it was Iraq that attacked us on 9/11 without actually saying Iraq. What else did you mean by this then? Hmmm...
Click to expand...

So finally you see, that I did not SAY that Iraq attacked us on 9/11. -lol-

Nor did I imply it. It has taken you over a month to figure out that I did not SAY what you claim; how long would it take for you to figure out that I did not imply it either? YEARS? -lol-

95DevilleNS said:
There you make an arguement that they were Iraqis and not Saudi's like the 9/11 commission report states. To further solidify the above quote on who/what attacked on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. I implied they were not all Saudi's, which the poster had claimed. Even the 9/11 commission report acknowledges that they were not all Saudi's.

The leftocrat spins yet again, when there are no FACTS in their favor.
 
95DevilleNS said:
There you claim that it was Iraq that attacked us on 9/11 without actually saying Iraq. What else did you mean by this then? Hmmm...
Click to expand...

What else did I mean.....

I meant to point out that it was not WMD that attacked New York on 9/11, it was not inanimate objects, it was terrorists, humans, if you want to call them that. That is why I asked "what" rather than "who" to try to illustrate the difference.
 
Vitas said:
Nonsense. I implied they were not all Saudi's, which the poster had claimed. Even the 9/11 commission report acknowledges that they were not all Saudi's.

The leftocrat spins yet again, when there are no FACTS in their favor.
Click to expand...

Quit weasle-wording and squirming in your seat. The FACT is that the large majority of the 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia (our so-called "friends"......... only because they sit on so much oil) and NOT ONE of them was from Iraq. Your lame attempt at insinuating otherwise is just another lame example of the typical crapservative tactic to twist facts to fit your fictitous position.

:thread:
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
Quit weasle-wording and squirming in your seat. The FACT is that the large majority of the 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia (our so-called "friends"......... only because they sit on so much oil) and NOT ONE of them was from Iraq. Your lame attempt at insinuating otherwise is just another lame example of the typical crapservative tactic to twist facts to fit your fictitous position.

:thread:
Click to expand...

The fact of the matter is that the majority of the hijackers established identities as Saudi Arabians. That is what criminals do, they establish false identities. They wanted to get on the planes that day. It does not mean that they were from Saudi Arabia. The bodies of TWO of the ten terrorists that attacked the WTC were identified. Two out of ten. What does that say about your theory?

My telling you that not all of the 01/09/11 terrorists were Saudi Arabians does not equate to a valid conclusion on your part that therefore the others were Iraqis. If you think that it does, MAKE YOUR CASE. –lol-

In any event, even IF they were all from Saudi Arabia does not mean jack. The question is who conspired to plan, orchestrate, train terrorists, attack, and then harbor the conspirators remaining alive after the 9/11 attack.

According to your theory, it was the Saudi Arabian government. Prove your case.

Your weak response will be to claim that I said it was the Iraqi government, Sadaam. That is not my claim, it is your weak imagination to allege that is my claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 82 (members: 0, guests: 82)
Back
Top