fossten
Dedicated LVC Member
Just a list of the titles here, link for the details.
#10 Spinning Kerry's "Botched Joke"
#9 Coddling Illegal Immigrants and the Liberals Who Love Them
#8 Howell Raines Rants Against Fox News
#7 "Racism" Against Democrat Harold Ford Jr.
#6 Linda Greenhouse's Liberal Harvard Admission
#5 Respectful Hearing Granted to "Bush Caused 9-11" Nuts
#4 Putting the Blame on Israel
#3 Mohammad Cartoon Hypocrisy
#2 Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr's. Left-Wing Graduation Rant
#1 The Times Cripples Another Terrorist Surveillance Program
http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2006/20061228130738.aspx
And now for their latest masterpiece:
December 29, 2006
Editorial
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/29/opinion/29fri1.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
The Rush to Hang Saddam Hussein
The important question was never really about whether Saddam Hussein was guilty of crimes against humanity. The public record is bulging with the lengthy litany of his vile and unforgivable atrocities: genocidal assaults against the Kurds; aggressive wars against Iran and Kuwait; use of internationally banned weapons like nerve gas; systematic torture of countless thousands of political prisoners.
What really mattered was whether an Iraq freed from his death grip could hold him accountable in a way that nurtured hope for a better future. A carefully conducted, scrupulously fair trial could have helped undo some of the damage inflicted by his rule. It could have set a precedent for the rule of law in a country scarred by decades of arbitrary vindictiveness. It could have fostered a new national unity in an Iraq long manipulated through its religious and ethnic divisions.
It could have, but it didn’t. After a flawed, politicized and divisive trial, Mr. Hussein was handed his sentence: death by hanging. This week, in a cursory 15-minute proceeding, an appeals court upheld that sentence and ordered that it be carried out posthaste. Most Iraqis are now so preoccupied with shielding their families from looming civil war that they seem to have little emotion left to spend on Mr. Hussein or, more important, on their own fading dreams of a new and better Iraq.
What might have been a watershed now seems another lost opportunity. After nearly four years of war and thousands of American and Iraqi deaths, it is ever harder to be sure whether anything fundamental has changed for the better in Iraq.
This week began with a story of British and Iraqi soldiers storming a police station that hid a secret dungeon in Basra. More than 100 men, many of them viciously tortured, were rescued from almost certain execution. It might have been a story from the final days of Baathist rule in March 2003, when British and American troops entered Basra believing they were liberating the subjugated Shiite south. But it was December 2006, and the wretched men being liberated were prisoners of the new Iraqi Shiite authorities.
Toppling Saddam Hussein did not automatically create a new and better Iraq. Executing him won’t either.
Wow, what an impressive resume for 12 months. When you look at it from a big picture perspective, is there any media outlet more liberal wacko than the New York Times?
#10 Spinning Kerry's "Botched Joke"
#9 Coddling Illegal Immigrants and the Liberals Who Love Them
#8 Howell Raines Rants Against Fox News
#7 "Racism" Against Democrat Harold Ford Jr.
#6 Linda Greenhouse's Liberal Harvard Admission
#5 Respectful Hearing Granted to "Bush Caused 9-11" Nuts
#4 Putting the Blame on Israel
#3 Mohammad Cartoon Hypocrisy
#2 Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr's. Left-Wing Graduation Rant
#1 The Times Cripples Another Terrorist Surveillance Program
http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2006/20061228130738.aspx
And now for their latest masterpiece:
December 29, 2006
Editorial
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/29/opinion/29fri1.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
The Rush to Hang Saddam Hussein
The important question was never really about whether Saddam Hussein was guilty of crimes against humanity. The public record is bulging with the lengthy litany of his vile and unforgivable atrocities: genocidal assaults against the Kurds; aggressive wars against Iran and Kuwait; use of internationally banned weapons like nerve gas; systematic torture of countless thousands of political prisoners.
What really mattered was whether an Iraq freed from his death grip could hold him accountable in a way that nurtured hope for a better future. A carefully conducted, scrupulously fair trial could have helped undo some of the damage inflicted by his rule. It could have set a precedent for the rule of law in a country scarred by decades of arbitrary vindictiveness. It could have fostered a new national unity in an Iraq long manipulated through its religious and ethnic divisions.
It could have, but it didn’t. After a flawed, politicized and divisive trial, Mr. Hussein was handed his sentence: death by hanging. This week, in a cursory 15-minute proceeding, an appeals court upheld that sentence and ordered that it be carried out posthaste. Most Iraqis are now so preoccupied with shielding their families from looming civil war that they seem to have little emotion left to spend on Mr. Hussein or, more important, on their own fading dreams of a new and better Iraq.
What might have been a watershed now seems another lost opportunity. After nearly four years of war and thousands of American and Iraqi deaths, it is ever harder to be sure whether anything fundamental has changed for the better in Iraq.
This week began with a story of British and Iraqi soldiers storming a police station that hid a secret dungeon in Basra. More than 100 men, many of them viciously tortured, were rescued from almost certain execution. It might have been a story from the final days of Baathist rule in March 2003, when British and American troops entered Basra believing they were liberating the subjugated Shiite south. But it was December 2006, and the wretched men being liberated were prisoners of the new Iraqi Shiite authorities.
Toppling Saddam Hussein did not automatically create a new and better Iraq. Executing him won’t either.
Wow, what an impressive resume for 12 months. When you look at it from a big picture perspective, is there any media outlet more liberal wacko than the New York Times?
