Too Funny To Be President?

04SCTLS

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
3,188
Reaction score
7
Location
Lockport
Huckabee's a joker. That's a problem.
By John Dickerson
Posted Monday, Dec. 17, 2007, at 7:42 PM ET

Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee is occasionally funny, but he is always the funny guy. "If you think that Medicare is expensive now, wait until 10,000 aging hippies a day find out they can get free drugs," he said in one GOP debate. "I may not have any foreign policy experience," he told Don Imus, "but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night." At a press conference in Iowa last week after the last GOP debate, Huckabee dished out so many one-liners that I wondered which staffer was responsible for the rim shot. His material is sometimes edgy and he even does impersonations, mimicking the voice of an Arkansas garage mechanic to explain how odd it was to ask for a seat belt in the 1960s. "You wanna do what? You wanna put in a strap so you tie yourself down in that car?" He probably has a puppet routine he's just saving for his appearance on Meet the Press.

The jokes have helped Huckabee pry his way into the GOP primary fight, first at an early debate—when he got Republicans chuckling by saying Congress spent more than John Edwards does at a beauty shop. His amusing ad with Chuck Norris also generated a good deal of buzz. The media love any candidate who is entertaining. Voters mention his humor approvingly when they talk about why they like him.

This is a general trait of the electorate—voters like presidents who know how to poke fun. Some of our most popular recent presidents have been able to keep people smiling. John Kennedy was a first-class wit who delighted in humor for its own sake. Reagan was more of a grandfatherly teller of set-piece jokes with some famous quips. "Honey, I forgot to duck," he told his wife after he was shot. To the surgeons he said, "I hope you're all Republicans." Clinton was a great storyteller and knew how to make fun of himself.

Our least popular presidents are the dour ones—Nixon and Carter told forced jokes, and when they smiled it unsettled people. Ford was funny, but it was inadvertent. George W. Bush likes to snicker, but that doesn't make him funny. The jokes he tells are often at someone else's expense. James Garfield's political adviser warned him against humor—"Never make the people laugh. If you would succeed in life you must be solemn, solemn as an ass." Garfield was assassinated three months into his term. Gore and Kerry tasked people to write jokes for them because they didn't want to get caught out as bad comedians.

Huckabee reminds me of Mo Udall, the last great punster and jester on the campaign trail who every candidate wants to quote but not emulate. "I'm Mo Udall and I'm running for president," the failed Democratic candidate said, walking into a shop. "Yeah," replied the barber, "we were just laughing about that." Candidates don't repeat Udall's better lines, like his post-election declaration—"The voters have spoken. The bastards." Or his observation that the difference between a cactus and a caucus is that with a cactus, the pricks are on the outside.

There is a limit, though, which the Udall examples thunderously show, to how many jokes a candidate can tell before voters think he's not serious. As Huckabee takes a commanding lead in the polls in Iowa and South Carolina, his opponents are trying to turn his humor against him. "No laughing matter," reads a series of Mitt Romney's press releases that claim to take "a serious look at Governor Mike Huckabee's record and policy beyond the one-liners." At the top of the release is the Holiday Inn Express logo. Last week, Fred Thompson's Iowa director also tried to rap Huckabee's knuckles: "The security of Americans and our allies is no laughing matter. What Americans are looking for in their next president is a commander in chief, not a Court Jester."

The attacks work on several levels. They suggest Huckabee is too light for the job and also that he makes jokes because he's hiding something. Behind every quip is a troubling reality on taxes, immigration, or his criminal justice record in Arkansas, the subject of Romney's brand-new ad. The strategy seeks to transform Huckabee's best asset into a liability.

Will this work? Yes, if for no other reason than they mess with Huckabee's head. He can't tell more jokes without worrying that he's playing into his opponents' hands. As he faces tougher questions, he can't fall back on shtick. "A group of AIDS patients walked into a quarantine …" Bad idea.

Hucakabee also can't joke his way past inexperience, and he has a problem with his party in this regard on the subject of national security and foreign affairs. His lack of any background is dangerous in a commander in chief, say critics, and worse, if he becomes the nominee, Republicans will give away what has been their national security trump card since the Cold War and especially after the attacks of Sept. 11.

Given this sobering worry, Huckabee may have given his opponents an opening this Sunday with his article in Foreign Affairs, in which he criticized George Bush for having an "arrogant bunker mentality." He also described international relations in terms of the school playground (America is the stingy straight-A student and therefore despised). Not a joke, exactly, but a metaphor that's on the juvenile side.

Romney immediately attacked the piece as unserious, saying Huckabee had "laughed off" the assignment to explain his foreign policy views. On his campaign bus rolling through New Hampshire John McCain accused Huckabee of "gratuitously bashing [Bush] ex post facto." Conservatives panned the article for being, as one former top Bush official put it, "sophomoric and repeating Democratic Party talking points." In the Republican ranks, there is some war fatigue, but Bush still has a 71 percent approval rating, so attacks on him are risky. But the larger problem for Huckabee may be that the narrative of his candidacy is that in a field of apostates, he is the candidate conservatives can feel is one of us. The Foreign Affairs piece doesn't fit that mold. It's a problem he's got to address—and with something more than jokes.
 
Paul on Huckabee: Fascism will be carrying a cross

I think the Democrats are waiting for the Republicans to finish duking it out amongst themselves.

Things have certainly gotten more interesting and even entertaining.


http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/12/pauls-issue-wit.html

By: Mark Memmott and Jill Lawrence

Paul's issue with Huckabee's Christmas ad: 'Fascism' will be 'carrying a cross'
Asked about Republican rival Mike Huckabee's Christmas-themed ad, which we wrote about yesterday and has attracted attention in part because of the image of a cross that many see hovering over Huckabee's shoulder, GOP presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul said this morning on FOX & Friends that:

"It reminds me of what Sinclair Lewis once said. He says, 'when fascism comes to this country, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross.' Now I don't know whether that's a fair assessment or not, but you wonder about using a cross, like he is the only Christian or implying that subtly. So, I don't think I would ever use anything like that." (Fox has put video from some of the interview here. To see Paul talking about the Huckabee ad, though, you need to check this clip at YouTube.)

Paul's linking of Huckabee's ad to fascism is certainly an attention-getter.

So too is a presidential contender quoting Sinclair Lewis, winner of the 1930 Nobel Prize in Literature and author of books including Babbit, Main Street and Elmer Gantry. That doesn't happen too often.

Out of curiosity, we did some checking to see if Lewis did actually say or write what Paul attributed to him.

The answer:

According to the executive director of The Sinclair Lewis Society, Illinois State University English Department associate dean Sally Parry, "it sounds like something Sinclair Lewis might have said or written ... but we've never been able to attribute it to him." We spoke to her by telephone this morning.

After the conversation, Parry sent us an e-mail with passages from two books Lewis wrote that at least hint at the words Paul attributed to him.

• From It Can't Happen Here: "But he saw too that in America the struggle was befogged by the fact that the worst Fascists were they who disowned the word 'Fascism' and preached enslavement to Capitalism under the style of Constitutional and Traditional Native American Liberty."

• From Gideon Planish: "I just wish people wouldn't quote Lincoln or the Bible, or hang out the flag or the cross, to cover up something that belongs more to the bank-book and the three golden balls."

According to Parry, the Lewis Society's website "must get a query about this (quote) every week." She doesn't know how it originally came to be attributed to Lewis.

Does anyone reading this have any insight to add on the quote's origins?

And, what about Paul's critique of the ad? Fair or not?

Update at 12:15 p.m. ET. The Huckabee campaign comments on the cross image:

Jill is in Des Moines today and spoke with Huckabee's Iowa director, Eric Woolson, about whether the cross that appears behind Huckabee in the ad was put there intentionally.

"It's the window frame in the background," Woolson said. "Once you've got it in your head that it's a cross, it's a cross." He said he didn't know if it was deliberate or not. "People are free to view the ad anyway that they'd like to view the ad."

Posted by Mark Memmott at 11:51 AM/ET, December 18, 2007 in Ads, Presidential race, 2008, Republicans
 
What a hoot!

An Obama/Oprah ticket or is it Oprah/Obama?

As for Hillary talk about holding your nose while voting....

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/?hpid=topnews

The Campaign to Humanize Hillary
Following last week's Democratic debate in Iowa, The Fix had the unique opportunity to sit in on focus groups conducted by The Washington Post.


Clinton campaigning in Iowa earlier this month with her mother, Dorothy Rodham (AP Photo)During the Democratic session, led by The Post's Dan Balz and David Broder, the group of 11 undecided voters was asked for their impressions about the debate and their general thoughts about the field of candidates.

As always when a group of Democrats are gathered, the conversation was dominated by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and revealed the problems and potential Clinton has in Iowa and beyond.

Asked to say whatever first came to mind when Clinton's name was mentioned, the group offered a fascinating panoply of descriptions. "Can't be trusted," said one. "I just got a glimpse that she's got an evil side to her," said another. A third offered a backhanded compliment of sorts: "Very good at saying what she thinks we want to hear."

Others were more positive in their remarks -- if not effusive. "Work ethic," said one; "I think she's really focused," said another.

The comments signal a larger theme when it comes to voters' views in Iowa and nationally about Clinton. She is widely respected but not widely liked. Time and again in last week's focus group, the voters said they had few doubts about Clinton's ability to do the job of president; they also expressed a frustration with the essential unknowability of Clinton as a person.

That paradox is born out in scads of polling data: Democrats believe in huge margins that Clinton is the candidate best able to win back the White House in 2008. The surveys simultaneously show the New York senator scoring far less well on more personality driven questions.

In The Post's most recent Iowa poll, in which Clinton trailed Barack Obama (30 percent to 26 percent), 39 percent of the sample said that Clinton had the best chance of getting elected president, compared with 25 percent who chose Obama and 22 percent who backed John Edwards. Asked which candidate had the "best experience" to be president, Clinton led with 38 percent, followed by Edwards at 16 percent and Obama at 11 percent.

But when voters were asked which candidate "best understands the problems of people like you," the results were reversed; Obama led with 30 percent, while Edwards was second with 25 percent and Clinton took third at 20 percent. Similarly, when asked which candidate is the "most honest and trustworthy," Obama led with 31 percent, followed by Edwards at 20 percent and Clinton at just 15 percent.

Jason Marcel, a focus group participant from Des Moines, summed up the Clinton paradox nicely. "I don't know if it's just her speaking style or what it does to certain people, but she's kind of polarizing," he said. "I mean, I admire her work ethic. I think, you know ... she would work very hard."

Given the current head ("I think she would do a good job") versus heart ("I just don't like her") split in Iowa, it's not at all surprising that the Clinton campaign seems to be bent on closing the campaign with a message focused on "Hillary the person" rather than "Hillary the politician."

It started with two ads that began running in Iowa last week featuring Clinton's mother, Dorothy, and the former first daughter, Chelsea.

In the first, footage is shown of the three generations of Clinton women -- taken from a recent campaign stop. The candidate says: "As I travel around I see so many families who share the same values I was brought up with. ...I'm proud to live by those values. But what I am most proud of is knowing who I've passed them onto."

The second ad features Dorothy Rodham extolling her daughter's lack of envy and her empathy. "She has empathy for other people's unfortunate circumstances. I've always admired that because it isn't always true of people," Rodham adds. "I think she ought to be elected even if she weren't my daughter."

The images in both ads are all soft corners and heart-warming. Nary a word of policy is mentioned in either.

Even as those ads were hitting the air, former president Bill Clinton sent out a fundraising e-mail touting his wife as "the best combination of heart and mind, of leadership ability and feel for the problems of other people I've ever known." She can be both head AND heart, according to her husband.

That e-mail was followed today with the unveiling of thehillaryiknow.com, which, according to a release from the campaign, "features video testimonials from regular Americans, longtime friends, and well-known leaders whose lives have all been changed by Hillary." Several people whose video testimonials appear on the site were traveling with Clinton Monday in Iowa for a series of what were widely described as emotional events.

Even the new ad that Clinton's campaign put up in Iowa Monday morning -- touting the Des Moines Register endorsement -- had a softer side to it. While the words of the endorsement are read by a narrator, Clinton is shown working at a desk in glasses, a look she almost never sports on the campaign trail. ("She has bad eyesight -- just like us!" the ad seems to be declaring.)

Because of Clinton's unique position in American politics (universally known and respected but not well liked by most), she is running what amounts to the reverse of a traditional campaign.

In a traditional campaign, a candidate spends the first part of the race familiarizing voters with his or her biography -- a tactic designed to get voters to identify with them before the nitty-gritty of the race truly begins. As a vote nears, the candidate (and his/her ad campaign) turns the focus to more detailed policy discussions.

Compare that to Clinton's campaign. Due to the fact that most voters already knew her, there was little introduction needed -- despite the campaign's claim that Clinton was the "most famous person no one really knows." The campaign, and Clinton herself, focused on her competency and her experience -- that she alone in the Democratic field was up to the job of being president.

Judging from The Post's Iowa focus groups, as well as piles of polling data, it worked. Voters seemed receptive to the idea that Clinton was capable and responsible; it played to the notion of her that many held from her days as first lady.

That task accomplished, the campaign is now attempting to tackle the much harder task of convincing voters in these last week's that Clinton is actually someone they could love -- or at least like enough to vote for.

Clinton will never be the "heart" candidate in this primary. But judging by tactics employed over the last week, her campaign clearly believes that a pure "head" appeal won't be enough for her to win the nomination. Interestingly, Obama and Edwards have the exact opposite challenge. They have voters' hearts but still face doubts about whether they can win.

With just 16 days before Iowa, can Clinton convince enough voters that she, too, is a real person who understands their problems?
 
Gawd what is this, a spam thread? Who's got time to read these loooong "other people's opinions?" Not me. *yawn*
 
Gawd what is this, a spam thread? Who's got time to read these loooong "other people's opinions?" Not me. *yawn*
Here's what I do when someone posts a long article I don't care to read. I downloaded ReadPlease, which is a free version of text-to-speak software. I copy and past the text into the software and press play and listen to it. You can speed it up and adjust font size too.
 
yes maybe I got a little carried away here fossten, but not everyone follows this stuff as keenly and passionately as you.
We all form our opinions from somewhere and I'm just giving the members here interested perceptions of Huckabee and Hillary as they evolve in the press.
 
Taken yesterday….she’s just as beautiful as the day she met Bill. :D

hillarywrinkledbj2.png
 
yes maybe I got a little carried away here fossten, but not everyone follows this stuff as keenly and passionately as you.
We all form our opinions from somewhere and I'm just giving the members here interested perceptions of Huckabee and Hillary as they evolve in the press.

Hey if you'd just listen to Rush you wouldn't need to read so much. :D

Mac1, thanks for the tip, that sounds like great software. Maybe I'll check it out. Speed it up? Now that would be funneh. Nothing like hearing a political op-ed sounding like Alvin and the Chipmunks. :D
 

Members online

Back
Top