What kind of man is Bush?

97silverlsc

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
953
Reaction score
0
Location
High Bridge, NJ
What kind of man is Bush?
http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/commentary/wb/wb/xp-46210



Tim Abbott

Abbott, of Hillsville, served in the U.S. Army from 1970 to 1974 and is a tutor at New River Community College.

I grew up during the Cold War, in the aftermath of World War II, and I am a Vietnam-era veteran, so through my life I have heard a lot about freedom.

I was raised at a time when the portraits of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln hung in schools and evoked patriotism. We were taught that we should emulate their ideals in thought and deed. They were the examples of principles such as individual conscience, political liberty and social justice.

Washington was the father of his country. He led the Revolutionary army, telling his officers to treat prisoners of war "with humanity," and, like Cincinnatus, voluntarily stepped down from the presidency.

Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, stating that all men have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And Lincoln was admired for his thought, humor and compassion. He wrote with malice toward none and charity for all.

Against these men and their successors were the fascist and communist dictators. In the photographs, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin and Francisco Franco strutted in military uniforms. Their concerns were not liberty, but national security and the national interests. All who opposed them were traitors and cowards.

Today we have other wars -- the war against terrorism and the Iraq war. Once again we are told these wars are about protecting our freedom.

Al-Qaida, we are told, wants to destroy us. Perhaps that is true, though it is hard to see how it is capable of such a feat. President Bush has called al-Qaida and Islamic fundamentalists "Islamo-fascists."

Bush talks a lot about freedom, courage, transparent government and the rule of law. He talks.

His speeches are carefully choreographed before audiences of his faithful -- often Christian fundamentalists or, to paraphrase Bush, Christian-fascists -- and they must sign loyalty oaths to Bush. He speaks before audience after audience of soldiers and sailors who cannot speak except as directed by the White House.

Others before whom he speaks may ask no questions. He runs from journalists, as we have seen in China, even on those rare occasions that he speaks before them.

Even worse, he has paid journalists to say good things about him and his policies. He also produces propaganda from government offices that he offers as news reports. And any protests against his policies are diverted well away from his sight and hearing.

In his Mission Accomplished foray, he wore a military uniform, something no president has done since Washington, and Washington only wore the uniform to quell a rebellion.

Around the world he has replaced the Soviet Gulag with the Bush Gulag, where men may be tortured.

He refuses to divulge the energy industries' influence upon his policies and the records of his Supreme Court nominees.

He refuses the United Nations access to question prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and refuses the Red Cross access to prisoners at CIA black sites. Furthermore, he threatened to veto legislation against the torture of prisoners even as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice conveyed a "don't ask, don't tell" torture policy to the world.

In Iraq, he took us into an unnecessary war.

He uses fear, intimidation, distortion and lies. I cannot tell whether the man cannot tell the truth or he doesn't know the truth.

From these few examples of many, what kind of man is Bush? Is he like Washington or Lincoln? Or is he a man of another kind? Not a Cincinnatus, but a Tarquin.

When I think of Bush, I do not think of liberty and courage, compassion and justice. No, I think of arrogance, greed and lies. He is a thug, a buffoon and a coward. Not only is he incompetent, he is corrupt.

He is of a kind with the dictators; a strutting, sanctimonious buffoon who talks democracy but acts like Saddam Hussein. Bush might differ in degree from Hussein, not having been in power as long, but in behavior, with torture and the corruption of government, they are of a kind.

While al-Qaida is an enemy of the values and principles of the United States and Western civilization and must be confronted, it can do no more than kill people and destroy property.

Bush can subvert our principles and institutions. He is the greater enemy.


Couldn't have said it better myself!!! :D
 
Those are pretty much the sentiments that I have voiced in opposition to BuSh.

I reiterate, "Worst President Ever".
 
What's the point of this article? This is a commentary/opinion piece -- just one man's opinion. He presents conclusions based on his own worldview. He presents no facts or arguments to support his position or persuade others that his view is more sound. Makes for good comedy reading, though.

This fellow's article appears eerily similar to Sidney Blumenthal's columns. Sid's views are so extreme he can't get an audience with a US newspaper and instead has to publish in the (leftwing) UK Guardian.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1667429,00.html
 
Hardly. You'll be eating crow again soon enough.
 
barry2952 said:
Hardly. You'll be eating crow again soon enough.
What??? After the Dems win back the House and Senate in '06 and vote to impeach Bush? Like I said...Clueless.
 
This guy talks out his a$$.He has no idea what he is talking about.Half the stuff he said is incorrect.And all of it is opinionated.Its people like this and the media that brainwash people like you 97silverlsc.They feed you a line of $h!t and you take it in because you are so gullable.You have no idea of the truth.This clown whines about us being in Iraq.Have we been attacked since 9/11?No,becuase unlike Bubba C,Bush decided to do something about it.That totally defeats this idiots claim of Bush being a coward.Please,enlighten me.Show me "torture and corruption" of the government.And why do you liberals care so much about the treatment of the evil POS terrorist we have imprisoned.They shouldn't be living.They should have been killed on the spot.You liberals seem to forget the 3000 Americans that these scumbags killed.This guy says Bush runs from journalists but also says he has paid them to say good things?Make up your mind.And show me proof of either.I would says that the war in Iraq is protecting our freedoms.Saddam has had ties with and was funding Al-Qaida and was running terrorists camps in Iraq.You also complain about Bush being a poor public speaker.True,but does that effect his decisions?No.I would much rather have someone who studders once in a while running my country than a total lier.Not to mention,Bush did get higher grades at Yale then you boy Kerry did.

You people can keep on being brainwashed and misimformed.Don't talk if you can't back anything up.Everything this retard said was opinion and was false.
 
...So President Bush is a greater threat than Islamo-Fascist terrorist?

This is important to recognize. These people think that Bush is the enemy, and that Al-Queda is a rational organization that we simply need to better understand and communciate with.
 
This is a good article because it illustrates the state of our academia in our hallowed institutions of higher learning in this day and age.
 
97silverlsc said:
What kind of man is Bush?
http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/commentary/wb/wb/xp-46210

Al-Qaida, we are told, wants to destroy us. Perhaps that is true, though it is hard to see how it is capable of such a feat.

Al-Qaida (sic) wants to destroy us? PERHAPS this is true? PERHAPS you forgot September 11. Or the countless terror attacks on Americans during the Clinton years. PERHAPS you forgot the messages we've received saying they want to destroy us, coming from bin Laden and other terrorist leaders. As for how they'll accomplish it, it can be accomplished if enough idiot dupes like this author and those who agree with him prevail.

97silverlsc said:
President Bush has called al-Qaida and Islamic fundamentalists "Islamo-fascists."

That would be because they are Islamic, and fascist.


97silverlsc said:
Bush talks a lot about freedom, courage, transparent government and the rule of law. He talks...


In addition to talking, we haven't been attacked on these shores again.

97silverlsc said:
His speeches are carefully choreographed before audiences of his faithful -- ..

His speeches are carefully choreographed...this is the left's favorite ploy to make absolutely nothing sound sinister. In other words, his speeches are written by speechwriters, and rehearsed. Know a President whose weren't?


97silverlsc said:
often Christian fundamentalists or, to paraphrase Bush, Christian-fascists -- and they must sign loyalty oaths to Bush.

It wouldn't be a left-wing hate piece without a gratutious attack on Christians. As far as loyalty oaths to hear Bush speak...pure fantasy. Among the people I know who have heard Bush speak in person, none have signed a loyalty oath. And that list includes my mother and my son.

97silverlsc said:
He speaks before audience after audience of soldiers and sailors who cannot speak except as directed by the White House..

Yes, the Commander in Chief does indeed address the troops. And no, they don't hold up protest signs. Ever hear of military discipline?


97silverlsc said:
Others before whom he speaks may ask no questions. He runs from journalists, as we have seen in China, even on those rare occasions that he speaks before them..

Except, of course, when he is conducting one of his many press conferences. In China, he attempted to leave the room when a door was locked. It was a humorous moment. Only the crazed Left could see something sinister in it.

97silverlsc said:
Even worse, he has paid journalists to say good things about him and his policies. He also produces propaganda from government offices that he offers as news reports. And any protests against his policies are diverted well away from his sight and hearing..

No, the Pentagon paid Iraqi newspapers to print positive news about the reconstruction there. It would be nice if we could get a few positive stories in this country as well. The journalists shouldn't have to be paid to present a balanced view, something we aren't getting in this country at all from the mainstream press.

97silverlsc said:
In his Mission Accomplished foray, he wore a military uniform, something no president has done since Washington, and Washington only wore the uniform to quell a rebellion...


No, he wore a flight suit. Perhaps you are unaware that he is a trained pilot.

97silverlsc said:
Around the world he has replaced the Soviet Gulag with the Bush Gulag, where men may be tortured...


Pure fantasy. And we are told we must believe that people, who cannot find a difference between Stalinist Russia and the USA, are patriots?

97silverlsc said:
He refuses to divulge the energy industries' influence upon his policies and the records of his Supreme Court nominees...


I'm sure they were all picked by Halliburton. (sarcasm) This article continues to deterioriate further into paranoid left-wing conspiracy theories.

97silverlsc said:
He refuses the United Nations access to question prisoners at Guantanamo Bay ..


To do what? Smuggle out attack plans? What possible business does a useless organization like the UN have at Guantanamo?

97silverlsc said:
and refuses the Red Cross access to prisoners at CIA black sites...


Of course, no one has yet proven the existence of these sites.

97silverlsc said:
Furthermore, he threatened to veto legislation against the torture of prisoners even as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice conveyed a "don't ask, don't tell" torture policy to the world...


And many of us feel he should have vetoed the Al-Qaeda bill of rights.

97silverlsc said:
In Iraq, he took us into an unnecessary war...


If we define defending the United States as unnecessary. Last I checked that was the President's job.

97silverlsc said:
He uses fear, intimidation, distortion and lies. I cannot tell whether the man cannot tell the truth or he doesn't know the truth...


I think the author is describing himself here. The insane frequently project their characteristics onto others.

97silverlsc said:
From these few examples of many, what kind of man is Bush? Is he like Washington or Lincoln? Or is he a man of another kind? Not a Cincinnatus, but a Tarquin.

When I think of Bush, I do not think of liberty and courage, compassion and justice. No, I think of arrogance, greed and lies. He is a thug, a buffoon and a coward. Not only is he incompetent, he is corrupt...


But he's a better man than you are.

97silverlsc said:
He is of a kind with the dictators; a strutting, sanctimonious buffoon who talks democracy but acts like Saddam Hussein. Bush might differ in degree from Hussein, not having been in power as long, but in behavior, with torture and the corruption of government, they are of a kind.

While al-Qaida is an enemy of the values and principles of the United States and Western civilization and must be confronted, it can do no more than kill people and destroy property.

Bush can subvert our principles and institutions. He is the greater enemy...


As Calabrio pointed out, this is why the Left is truly dangerous. This paragraph truly says it all. The Left are unable to see the difference between a murderous tyrant and the leader of the free world. They cannot discern differences between the greatest democracy in the history of the world and third-world dictatorships. They are people who believe that the United States is always to blame , and is always wrong.

Anyone who seriously believes that Bush, not bin Laden, is the real enemy, is either clinically insane or a traitor. Take your pick.

97silverlsc said:
Couldn't have said it better myself!!! :D

I'm not surprised.
 
Originally Posted by 97silverlsc

"Tim Abbott
In his Mission Accomplished foray, he wore a military uniform, something no president has done since Washington, and Washington only wore the uniform to quell a rebellion..."

Hey, didn't Dukakis wear a military uniform? Oh, that's right. He wasn't President. Thank God.

mn_tank.jpg


20030501-15_d050103-2-664v.jpg
 
RB3 said:
Al-Qaida (sic) wants to destroy us? PERHAPS this is true? PERHAPS you forgot September 11. Or the countless terror attacks on Americans during the Clinton years. PERHAPS you forgot the messages we've received saying they want to destroy us, coming from bin Laden and other terrorist leaders. As for how they'll accomplish it, it can be accomplished if enough idiot dupes like this author and those who agree with him prevail.



That would be because they are Islamic, and fascist.





In addition to talking, we haven't been attacked on these shores again.



His speeches are carefully choreographed...this is the left's favorite ploy to make absolutely nothing sound sinister. In other words, his speeches are written by speechwriters, and rehearsed. Know a President whose weren't?




It wouldn't be a left-wing hate piece without a gratutious attack on Christians. As far as loyalty oaths to hear Bush speak...pure fantasy. Among the people I know who have heard Bush speak in person, none have signed a loyalty oath. And that list includes my mother and my son.



Yes, the Commander in Chief does indeed address the troops. And no, they don't hold up protest signs. Ever hear of military discipline?




Except, of course, when he is conducting one of his many press conferences. In China, he attempted to leave the room when a door was locked. It was a humorous moment. Only the crazed Left could see something sinister in it.



No, the Pentagon paid Iraqi newspapers to print positive news about the reconstruction there. It would be nice if we could get a few positive stories in this country as well. The journalists shouldn't have to be paid to present a balanced view, something we aren't getting in this country at all from the mainstream press.




No, he wore a flight suit. Perhaps you are unaware that he is a trained pilot.




Pure fantasy. And we are told we must believe that people, who cannot find a difference between Stalinist Russia and the USA, are patriots?




I'm sure they were all picked by Halliburton. (sarcasm) This article continues to deterioriate further into paranoid left-wing conspiracy theories.




To do what? Smuggle out attack plans? What possible business does a useless organization like the UN have at Guantanamo?




Of course, no one has yet proven the existence of these sites.




And many of us feel he should have vetoed the Al-Qaeda bill of rights.




If we define defending the United States as unnecessary. Last I checked that was the President's job.




I think the author is describing himself here. The insane frequently project their characteristics onto others.




But he's a better man than you are.




As Calabrio pointed out, this is why the Left is truly dangerous. This paragraph truly says it all. The Left are unable to see the difference between a murderous tyrant and the leader of the free world. They cannot discern differences between the greatest democracy in the history of the world and third-world dictatorships. They are people who believe that the United States is always to blame , and is always wrong.

Anyone who seriously believes that Bush, not bin Laden, is the real enemy, is either clinically insane or a traitor. Take your pick.



I'm not surprised.

That was some of the best dissecting I've seen since 10th Grade Biology.

Phil, you and your LWW writer are *owned*
 
97silverlsc said:
AND totally meaningless!!!

:D

P.S. Didn't you finish that biology class last semester?

Typical. Can't debate an issue on the merits, so you attack personally. Go back and stand under Michael Moore's shadow.
 
You're right, I did lower my self, a little bit, to the level of Bryan and crew with that last post, I apologize.

I still agree with the sentiments expressed in the lead editorial of this post.
 
97silverlsc said:
You're right, I did lower my self, a little bit, to the level of Bryan and crew with that last post, I apologize.

I still agree with the sentiments expressed in the lead editorial of this post.

Your apology is insincere, sarcastic, vitriolic, and meaningless, containing nothing even resembling actual truth. Much like your articles and posts.
 
Your logic is flawed, begging the question. You have no idea what to say in response so you imply that I need to calm down. Typical flash and distract tactic, very amateurish.

Go back to cut/paste, you're better at that.
 
You resort to name calling and belittling people, and when someone responds in kind you display righteous indignation. Get over yourself or move to DC and join the Shrub (lack of) brain trust.:D
 
97silverlsc said:
You resort to name calling and belittling people, and when someone responds in kind you display righteous indignation. Get over yourself or move to DC and join the Shrub (lack of) brain trust.:D

There you go again, making it up as you go.

Quote my post in this thread where I called you a name.

COME ON, DO IT!
 
That you haven't done it in this thread (yet) doesn't mean it hasn't happened elsewhere.
There are other threads where you have done just what I said. Stop playing the innocent schoolgirl routine and grow up.
 
Its okay fossten,the best thing to do is ignore someone with such a lack of intelligence.Because the odds are your not going to get anywhere with such a person.He has been proven wrong and he knows it.The article which he blindly supports because he is extremly misinformed because he listens to the media so much has been broken down and chopped into peices and every aspect of the ignorant article has been proven wrong with facts.See fossten,the main difference between us and the lefties is that they make false,opinionated statements that mean nothing because they are unable to back anything up.Its hard to back opinion up when its wrong.We bring facts to table,and the can't say anything about our facts.So instead of admitting they're wrong they will resort insulting and belittling us because we are right and they are wrong.And when we defend ourselfs,they will start making accusations like lsc did by saying you were namecalling and and belittling.When you infact,did not.And he,infact,did.

P.S.-97silverlsc,don't respond by accusing me of calling you dumb or something.I have noticed in all your posts in the political forum that your throw down nothing but your own false opinion.This is a sign of a lack of intelligence because any real debater brings FACTS to the table,not the opinion,considering nobody cares what YOU(the debater in general) think.People are looking for facts.So lets end this thread by you admitting that the article is indeed pointless because it expresses some libbies opinion.And RB3 simply broke it down and proved the whole thing wrong with FACTS,not opinions.
 
Mind telling me the humor?I didn't think it was funny...
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top