theophile
Well-Known LVC Member
I took my 2002 LS Sport V8 to the shop this morning because it suddenly started spitting ATF all over the ground and the PS is making a racket. I figured with the unusually cold weather (for this area) an O-ring finally gave out somewhere and I'm just not in the mood these days to spend the entire day under my car cursing and cutting my hands. While I was at it I asked them about changing the valve cover gaskets because it has needed doing for a long time and I just don't want to do it.
The shop called me back and quoted me $1400 to replace the PS pump, flush and refill the fluid, replace the oil pan gasket, change the oil, and clean the undercarriage. They said they will not do the VCGs because, according to the mechanic, it needs the entire valve cover assembly and they can't order that anymore. I asked how they can be sure it's the valve cover itself and not just the gasket, and the guy told me the mechanic wouldn't have indicated the entire assembly if it was just the gasket.
As far I recall, the VCGs are a common failure item on these cars but the valve covers are not. Is that generally correct? I suppose more importantly, is it possible to diagnose the valve cover itself (as opposed to just the gasket) simply by visual inspection without removing anything (since that's what the mechanic did given the amount of time before the phone call)? The only thing that would suck worse than having to do the whole VCG procedure is doing it and then finding out that it was the covers themselves and I have do to it all again.
Thanks in advance.
The shop called me back and quoted me $1400 to replace the PS pump, flush and refill the fluid, replace the oil pan gasket, change the oil, and clean the undercarriage. They said they will not do the VCGs because, according to the mechanic, it needs the entire valve cover assembly and they can't order that anymore. I asked how they can be sure it's the valve cover itself and not just the gasket, and the guy told me the mechanic wouldn't have indicated the entire assembly if it was just the gasket.
As far I recall, the VCGs are a common failure item on these cars but the valve covers are not. Is that generally correct? I suppose more importantly, is it possible to diagnose the valve cover itself (as opposed to just the gasket) simply by visual inspection without removing anything (since that's what the mechanic did given the amount of time before the phone call)? The only thing that would suck worse than having to do the whole VCG procedure is doing it and then finding out that it was the covers themselves and I have do to it all again.
Thanks in advance.