rmac694203
Dedicated LVC Member
*owned*
Tractionless said:Glad to see you guys talking sh!t about something you know absolutely nothing about.
The dyno numbers and time posted were done so in 1999, when the car was disassembled in 2002 it was quite different. Obviously a 650 hp car isn't going to run a 12.1@112, I agree.
So lets review the slander thrown at me even though I haven't attacked anyone's sexuality or IQ as those have done to me in this thread.
MY car wasn't AWD so therefore estimating CHP is much easier and getting off the line was much harder with FWD then your precious RWD monster. Dr. Paul read the website sheesh you are a DR. ......Right.
Cars with the 6 bolt crank didn't have crankwalk.
The car was factory turbo not added to a NA car, and had only rods on a stock crank and stock pistons.
The car was full weight coming in at 3100lbs. with driver.
That's it for me no need to defend myself against individuals who personally attack and humiliate others for their own enjoyment.
Its funny as crap when people try to make cars fast that weren't intended to be.
Mine happens to be I used to own a 650 crank HP turbo 4 cyl. that had AC and power steering and didn't sound like I was dragging metal trash cans down the street
It's interesting how some enjoy the motorsports community as a whole no matter how the vehicle is powered as compared to those who are so closed minded they will slander a fellow enthusiest....it's truely SAD.
Thanks to all of you in this thread for demonstrating your lack of intellect and class.
BTW there are motorcycles making 550whp.........Can't wait to see what response that brings.
Tractionless said:Glad to see you guys talking :q:q:q:q about something you know absolutely nothing about.
The dyno numbers and time posted were done so in 1999, when the car was disassembled in 2002 it was quite different. Obviously a 650 hp car isn't going to run a 12.1@112, I agree.
So lets review the slander thrown at me even though I haven't attacked anyone's sexuality or IQ as those have done to me in this thread.
MY car wasn't AWD so therefore estimating CHP is much easier and getting off the line was much harder with FWD then your precious RWD monster. Dr. Paul read the website sheesh you are a DR. ......Right.
Cars with the 6 bolt crank didn't have crankwalk.
The car was factory turbo not added to a NA car, and had only rods on a stock crank and stock pistons.
The car was full weight coming in at 3100lbs. with driver.
That's it for me no need to defend myself against individuals who personally attack and humiliate others for their own enjoyment.
It's interesting how some enjoy the motorsports community as a whole no matter how the vehicle is powered as compared to those who are so closed minded they will slander a fellow enthusiest....it's truely SAD. Thanks to all of you in this thread for demonstrating your lack of intellect and class.
BTW there are motorcycles making 550whp.........Can't wait to see what response that brings.
Tractionless said:Yes my stupid ass 4 cylinder was meant to be fast. It was billed as a sports car during its production and was turbo charged from the factory. Something tells me if a production car is force fed stock it wasn't meant to be a grocery getter. The fact that I tripled the stock HP wasn't a coincedence as they were good for 500 crank HP on the stock block/internals.
Tractionless said:Blahahah that was fun you guys are great!!