Anyone know whos CAMMED mark this is?

Glad to see you guys talking :q:q:q:q about something you know absolutely nothing about.

The dyno numbers and time posted were done so in 1999, when the car was disassembled in 2002 it was quite different. Obviously a 650 hp car isn't going to run a 12.1@112, I agree.

So lets review the slander thrown at me even though I haven't attacked anyone's sexuality or IQ as those have done to me in this thread.

MY car wasn't AWD so therefore estimating CHP is much easier and getting off the line was much harder with FWD then your precious RWD monster. Dr. Paul read the website sheesh you are a DR. ......Right.

Cars with the 6 bolt crank didn't have crankwalk.

The car was factory turbo not added to a NA car, and had only rods on a stock crank and stock pistons.

The car was full weight coming in at 3100lbs. with driver.

That's it for me no need to defend myself against individuals who personally attack and humiliate others for their own enjoyment.

It's interesting how some enjoy the motorsports community as a whole no matter how the vehicle is powered as compared to those who are so closed minded they will slander a fellow enthusiest....it's truely SAD. Thanks to all of you in this thread for demonstrating your lack of intellect and class.

BTW there are motorcycles making 550whp.........Can't wait to see what response that brings.:D
 
Tractionless said:
Glad to see you guys talking sh!t about something you know absolutely nothing about.

What do you know about what I know?

The dyno numbers and time posted were done so in 1999, when the car was disassembled in 2002 it was quite different. Obviously a 650 hp car isn't going to run a 12.1@112, I agree.

Oh, so now the car makes more power than the numbers posted? Do you have a dyno video complete with a screenshot of the computer to back this up, or are you just making stuff up again?

So lets review the slander thrown at me even though I haven't attacked anyone's sexuality or IQ as those have done to me in this thread.

You're the one who came in here all high-and-mighty telling us about your awesome "sportscar" (LMAO) that wasn't designed to be a grocery getter. We don't need to attack the IQ of someone who thinks 315 front wheel horsepower translates to 650 "at the crank." :rolleyes:

MY car wasn't AWD so therefore estimating CHP is much easier and getting off the line was much harder with FWD then your precious RWD monster. Dr. Paul read the website sheesh you are a DR. ......Right.

[Edit] you can't reliably estimate crank horsepower. There are waaaay too many variables, and using some lame 'fudge factor' doesn't cut it. Furthermore, I'm pretty sure that YOU aren't losing 52% of your power through that awesome super-heavy, super-strong drivetrain of yours.

Cars with the 6 bolt crank didn't have crankwalk.

A little of a sore subject for you?

The car was factory turbo not added to a NA car, and had only rods on a stock crank and stock pistons.

So, you're saying your 650 horsepower car had stock internals? Wow.:shifty:

The car was full weight coming in at 3100lbs. with driver.

Sweet, my car weighed in a 3860 lbs (that's from an actual scale, not some number I made up), and yet your numbers still aren't even beginning to impress anyone.

That's it for me no need to defend myself against individuals who personally attack and humiliate others for their own enjoyment.

Here's a few gems from the knowledge vault we all know Tractionless to be...

Its funny as crap when people try to make cars fast that weren't intended to be.

Mine happens to be I used to own a 650 crank HP turbo 4 cyl. that had AC and power steering and didn't sound like I was dragging metal trash cans down the street


So basically, you came on here talking smack, and then tried to back it up with a sh!tty car, that doesn't make the power you say, that isn't a sportscar by any stretch of the imagination, that YOU DON'T OWN ANYMORE/

Few things are worse than those who talk smack with imaginary, sold, broken, or otherwise 'under construction' cars.

It's interesting how some enjoy the motorsports community as a whole no matter how the vehicle is powered as compared to those who are so closed minded they will slander a fellow enthusiest....it's truely SAD.

Do you want me to read back your quotes from above to you? Or is Irony completely lost on you?

Thanks to all of you in this thread for demonstrating your lack of intellect and class.

See above.

BTW there are motorcycles making 550whp.........Can't wait to see what response that brings.:D

Sweet, and there are V8s making 8000 horsepower, what's your point?





[Edit] Why don't you take your imaginary 650 horsepower 'sportscar', and cram it and [Edit]

Cheers,

Dr. Paul.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tractionless said:
Glad to see you guys talking :q:q:q:q about something you know absolutely nothing about.

The dyno numbers and time posted were done so in 1999, when the car was disassembled in 2002 it was quite different. Obviously a 650 hp car isn't going to run a 12.1@112, I agree.

So lets review the slander thrown at me even though I haven't attacked anyone's sexuality or IQ as those have done to me in this thread.

MY car wasn't AWD so therefore estimating CHP is much easier and getting off the line was much harder with FWD then your precious RWD monster. Dr. Paul read the website sheesh you are a DR. ......Right.

Cars with the 6 bolt crank didn't have crankwalk.

The car was factory turbo not added to a NA car, and had only rods on a stock crank and stock pistons.

The car was full weight coming in at 3100lbs. with driver.

That's it for me no need to defend myself against individuals who personally attack and humiliate others for their own enjoyment.

It's interesting how some enjoy the motorsports community as a whole no matter how the vehicle is powered as compared to those who are so closed minded they will slander a fellow enthusiest....it's truely SAD. Thanks to all of you in this thread for demonstrating your lack of intellect and class.

BTW there are motorcycles making 550whp.........Can't wait to see what response that brings.:D

dur, there are bikes that come from the factory with 550whp... (stares at the tomahawk)


It is interesting how some enjoy the motorsports community as a whole no matter how the vehicle is powered....but, the funny thing is, as far as im concerned i dont give a cra p as to your imports, even if it runs 4's and it says mitsu or has a big ol H on the back, its good for only three things, grocery gettin, a place to put your trash when the cans are full, and pickin up vd infested c um dumpsters down on the corner of the only way you get any and life sucks with a 4 banger.

[Edit]

dont worry, we all have class here..very much so, this is one outstanding group of people here, but...in all fairness you started it, and here, if you start it, we finish it..and finish it d amn good.

now go run along and walk your crank home ::whistles:: "want to go for a walk! go find your leash!"


(oh yea, theres some videos floatin arround here of a mark with forged internals that puts out ONLY 7psi and runs 11's...unfortunatly it weighs bout 3800lbs. what a shame.)




btw, dr paul...you crack me the F up!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tractionless said:
Yes my stupid ass 4 cylinder was meant to be fast. It was billed as a sports car during its production and was turbo charged from the factory. Something tells me if a production car is force fed stock it wasn't meant to be a grocery getter. The fact that I tripled the stock HP wasn't a coincedence as they were good for 500 crank HP on the stock block/internals.


there are plenty of FI Volvos and Saabs that i would classify as grocery getters.
 
btw I love DSM's. I don't have a problem with turbo 4's. I do have a problem with someone like tractionless talking :q:q:q:q about someone else's motor simply because it has less hp than his, and then somehow implying that it could never have as much hp as his. that's just dumb.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top