Are the Atheists Causing Terrorism?

RB3 said:
Except you didn't say "you conservatives."



It's you that dismissed a serious article as "humor." If you feel that questions your intelligence, well, you're the one who said it, not me. I merely suggested that that must be the reason you keep answering serious posts with "Lol."




Except no one called you anything. It's just self-pity for you to say that. Which is martyrdom.




No, I draw the conclusion that you've lost by reading the threads.



In the immortal words of Ronald Reagan..."There you go again."

Are other people here sometimes sarcastic and condescending, including me? Yep. I freely admit it. But it is delivered in a larger context, and as a part of, seriously addressing the issue. And it is frequently in reponse to sarcasm from others, as mine has been to yours.

But you just give us sarcasm and condescension. Rarely more. And if you're going to dish it out, you need to be able to take it.
Click to expand...

Bottom line, any article that is against Bush or against conservative ideology is open to cheap shots and easily dismissed as general garbage and not to be taken seriously. I think we have enough post here by Mespock, Johnny, Raveneyes and Barry to prove that. While any article that is pro Bush, pro conservative is not open to such attacks. You feel the article is serious, fine, does that mean I or anyone else has to feel the same? I read it top to bottom and found it to be no more than selling point for religion, while making a thinly veiled accusation that atheist are the problem.

As far as you not calling me unintelligent, ok you just 'suggested' it. But on the flip side, if I 'suggested' that you're an blubbering moron or any other insult but didn't actually say you were, you and your posse would jump on me for using 'typical liberal name calling' as has been said here repeatedly and that is a fact.

To clarify me saying 'Call me what you will', I cannot stop you from insulting me, MonsterMark the moderator is clearly on your side of the fence so therefore, 'Call me what you will' is simply that. If you want to take it as me being a martyr, that’s your problem.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Bottom line, any article that is against Bush or against conservative ideology is open to cheap shots and easily dismissed as general garbage and not to be taken seriously. I think we have enough post here by Mespock, Johnny and Barry to prove that. While any article that is pro Bush, pro conservative is not open to such attacks. You feel the article is serious, fine, does that mean I or anyone else has to feel the same? I read it top to bottom and found it to be no more than selling point for religion, while making a thinly veiled accusation that atheist are the problem.

As far as you not calling me unintelligent, ok you just 'suggested' it. But on the flip side, if I 'suggested' that you're an blubbering moron or any other insult but didn't actually say you were, you and your posse would jump on me for using 'typical liberal name calling' as has been said here repeatedly and that is a fact.
Click to expand...

Wow, mixed in with your usual self-serving whining, you actually swerved into a point: "no more than selling point for religion, while making a thinly veiled accusation that atheist are the problem." Now that I will address. (It wasn't thinly veiled by the way...it came right out and said it.)

I posted this for one reason: Because your side of the aisle constantly says that the USA defending itself is the cause of terrorism. If we accept that premise (AND I DO NOT) then it would appear that the Muslim's beef is not with Bush, whom you blame, but people like you.

And that was an irony too good to ignore. :rolleyes:
 
RB3 said:
Wow, mixed in with your usual self-serving whining, you actually swerved into a point: "no more than selling point for religion, while making a thinly veiled accusation that atheist are the problem." Now that I will address. (It wasn't thinly veiled by the way...it came right out and said it.)

I posted this for one reason: Because your side of the aisle constantly says that the USA defending itself is the cause of terrorism. If we accept that premise (AND I DO NOT) then it would appear that the Muslim's beef is not with Bush, whom you blame, but people like you.

And that was an irony too good to ignore. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Self-serving whining? Whatever floats your boat. But you proved my point, I disagreed with the article and you took it personally. Talk about being a whiner.

People like me? I am not an atheist.
 
95DevilleNS said:
Self-serving whining? Whatever floats your boat. But you proved my point, I disagreed with the article and you took it personally. Talk about being a whiner.

People like me? I am not an atheist.
Click to expand...

I will rely on others reading the posts to know which one of us is whining, and which one of us took it personally.
 
RB3 said:
I will rely on others reading the posts to know which one of us is whining, and which one of us took it personally.
Click to expand...

Deville, quit whining and taking stuff personally. :p

Oh, BTW, your statement about articles doesn't hold water. Nobody says that the articles we post aren't open to debate. It just so happens that we post articles that are so bulletproof that you Fiberals can't argue with them without sounding retarded, so you leave them alone. Not our fault that we're always right.
 
fossten said:
Deville, quit whining and taking stuff personally. :p

Oh, BTW, your statement about articles doesn't hold water. Nobody says that the articles we post aren't open to debate. It just so happens that we post articles that are so bulletproof that you Fiberals can't argue with them without sounding retarded, so you leave them alone. Not our fault that we're always right.
Click to expand...

Wow, that was brilliant. Be sure to pat yourself on the back with both hands.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 95 (members: 0, guests: 95)
Back
Top