Bush, and Iraq

I'll save you the trouble...

Conservatives: He's ok, I disagree with him on some issues and decisions, but he's a good leader and he follows what he believes. I wish he was more conservative.

Fiberals: Bush sucks! He - he - he - he caused the ozone layer to rupture! Yeah, and he lied about Monica Lewinsky! Yeah! And he even piloted all four planes at 9/11! He hates blacks and loves oil! Yeah, and he hates Louisiana and loves Texas! Yeah! And he caused Mt. St. Helens to blow up! And Pompeii, too!
 
fossten said:
I'll save you the trouble...

Conservatives: He's ok, I disagree with him on some issues and decisions, but he's a good leader and he follows what he believes. I wish he was more conservative.

Fiberals: Bush sucks! He - he - he - he caused the ozone layer to rupture! Yeah, and he lied about Monica Lewinsky! Yeah! And he even piloted all four planes at 9/11! He hates blacks and loves oil! Yeah, and he hates Louisiana and loves Texas! Yeah! And he caused Mt. St. Helens to blow up! And Pompeii, too!


http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
 
WMD found in Iraq to Date. Won't hear this from the Mainstream Press.

1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)

Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas

Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency
 
I support the mission. Hind sight is always 20/20 so criticism of the war always comes easier than planning and excuting the war.
 
Bush-The worst type of politician, turns his back on the people who elected him, a fiscal liberal, gets things started and fails to follow through, advances his cronies over more qualified people, and why is he getting all chummy with Clinton?

Iraq- Kick out the reporters and the UN weasels, then let the military do the job they're trained for. Examine historical precidents set in Europe and Japan following WW II. They didn't turn out to bad, but it didn't happen overnight.
 
MonsterMark said:
WMD found in Iraq to Date. Won't hear this from the Mainstream Press.

1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents

17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)

Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas

Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency

Where did you hear this BS, Rush? BuSh would be jumping up and down and doing cartwheels if this were true.

State your source Bryan.
 
barry2952 said:
Where did you hear this BS, Rush? BuSh would be jumping up and down and doing cartwheels if this were true.

State your source Bryan.

He heard it from his pal, Dick Cheney.

Edited: Haha, that was a low blow. Sorry MM.
 
Please disregard the disruption. Let’s talk about the Iraq situation.

All that I ask is that people express real opinions, not emotions.

Fair enough?
 
For instance, about the warheads found by Polish troops, supposedly containing cyclosarin gas.

BAGHDAD (AFP) - Multinational forces in Iraq (news - web sites) said that more than a dozen missile warheads said to contain mustard gas or sarin have tested negative for chemical agents.

Washington had announced the find by Polish troops on Thursday, which was later confirmed by Warsaw.

The head of Poland's military intelligence service also said on Friday that "terrorist" groups were seeking to acquire the weapons.

But the 122mm warheads, found in late June, have been found not to contain the deadly chemicals, a statement from multinational forces here said.

"Those 16 rounds were all empty and tested negative for any type of chemicals," it said.

Two other warheads found in mid-June were found to contain an insignificant amount of sarin gas. The armaments were left over from the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the statement said.

"Due to the deteriorated state of the rounds and small quantity of remaining agent, these rounds were determined to have limited to no impact if used by insurgents against coalition forces."

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...deast_afp/iraq_us_poland_weapons_040702184424
 
That is cut and paste.

What I asked for is:

All that I ask is that people express real opinions, not emotions.
 
Vitas said:
That is cut and paste.

What I asked for is:

All that I ask is that people express real opinions, not emotions.

Well, Vitas, I understand what you're trying to do, but keep in mind that sometimes we have to use articles (that are factual in nature) in order to back up our opinions.

I don't approve of using opinion articles to front for our opinions, but most of our opinions stem from our emotions, so keep that in mind.
 
fossten said:
./...sometimes we have to use articles (that are factual in nature) in order to back up our opinions.

So then it is not YOUR opinion.

If one cannot express an opinion by themselfs......
 
barry2952 said:
Where did you hear this BS, Rush? BuSh would be jumping up and down and doing cartwheels if this were true.

State your source Bryan.
I culled it from Human Events Online. I'll try to do a search and come up with it. I didn't save or bookmark it.

And P.S. Barry. I hardly ever listen to Rush. Maybe once a month. I watch some Fox news but really enjoy watching CNN and MSNBC twist the truth. It is much more entertaining to know the truth and then see those guys spin it. More fun.
 
raVeneyes said:
"Well, we've made the decision to defeat the terrorists abroad so we don't have to face them here at home. And when you engage the terrorists abroad, it causes activity and action."—George Bush - Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

(Action and activity here on our soil)

Let's bring that right here.
 
barry2952 said:
Where did you hear this BS, Rush? BuSh would be jumping up and down and doing cartwheels if this were true.

State your source Bryan.

FYI, I listen to Rush every day. So what?
 
raVeneyes said:
Do you not agree? Don't you think that war abroad increases the chances that a terrorist cell will be active here?
And so you think there are no terrorist cells here now, and haven't been here for years upon years ~ even way before 9/11?
 
MonsterMark said:
And so you think there are no terrorist cells here now, and haven't been here for years upon years ~ even way before 9/11?

No, I think they *are* here and the war like stance the administration has been taking gives them legitimacy (in their minds) for what they plan on doing.
 
raVeneyes said:
No, I think they *are* here and the war like stance the administration has been taking gives them legitimacy (in their minds) for what they plan on doing.

I guess they didn't feel they had "legitimacy" before 9/11 too?

And I guess they're just hanging out. The lack of an attack on American soil has nothing to do with the fact Al-Queda is under assault, all their resouces are being siezed, and what is available is being sent to Iraq instead. No, they're just hanging out waiting... waiting.... for about 5 or 6 years, quietly. Sure. That makes sense.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top