Clinton the Cheater...at Golf

fossten

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
6
Location
Louisville
Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Wednesday, May 31, 2006 5:53 p.m. EDT

Tiger Woods: Bill Clinton Cheats at Golf, Too

In Arkansas for a children's golf clinic, Tiger Woods was asked about playing golf with former President Bill Clinton.

"Interesting math," Woods said, drawing a laugh before telling a story about a round the two played in February before the opening of the Tiger Woods Learning Center in Anaheim, Calif.

Woods described a hole on the back nine.

"President Clinton rolls one in the bushes, then hits another one off the tee ... right in the middle of the fairway, hits a nice little wedge shot up there to about, I don't know, 6-7 feet.

"I hit a bad pitch, I blasted it by about 12 feet. ... Then all of the sudden, he does one of these," Woods said, gesturing like a player picking up his ball.

"It was 6-7 feet and he walked off the green. ... So I'm sitting in the cart. He's writing down the numbers, I happen to kind of ..." Woods said, leaning back as if reading a scorecard over someone's shoulder.

"Woods 4, Clinton 3."

On a more serious note, Woods said playing with Clinton was fascinating.

"We had a good time," Woods said. "He was a cool person to play with, very intelligent. Brilliant, the things that he knew to describe world politics ... actually really remarkable."

Can a leopard change its spots?
 
I've played alot of 'business golf'. You can tell alot about a business person by the way he plays golf. Clinton cheating on his score card? No surprise. I'm sure he has a great footwedge too.;)
 
Yes, Clinton cheated at golf. He also is no longer the president, so who really gives a flying crap?

Maybe you should be more interested in the current president's dishonesty. It has had far worse complications then messing up an intern's best dress.
 
KharmaDog said:
Yes, Clinton cheated at golf. He also is no longer the president, so who really gives a flying crap?

Maybe you should be more interested in the current president's dishonesty. It has had far worse complications then messing up an intern's best dress.

You're starting out at Political Posting 101, my friend. You better grow up fast. This topic has been debated before.

My questions to you are:

1. Were you critical or even interested in Clinton's scandal with Monica Lewinski when it happened, or were you one of the ones saying it wasn't anybody's business what somebody does in their private life?

2. Why doesn't it bother you that the President of this country for eight years (Clinton) has shown a tendency time and time again to be a pathological liar?

3. Can you cite, with detailed facts and support to prove your point, what Bush has done to prove that he is dishonest? Be sure to include weblinks where appropriate. No bloviating without backup in here.

4. Do you know how to go back and read old topics before you bring them up all over again? If you do, then you would know that your point has been discussed at length on this board, with no success on your side.
 
fossten said:
You're starting out at Political Posting 101, my friend. You better grow up fast. This topic has been debated before.

My questions to you are:

1. Were you critical or even interested in Clinton's scandal with Monica Lewinski when it happened, or were you one of the ones saying it wasn't anybody's business what somebody does in their private life?

2. Why doesn't it bother you that the President of this country for eight years (Clinton) has shown a tendency time and time again to be a pathological liar?

3. Can you cite, with detailed facts and support to prove your point, what Bush has done to prove that he is dishonest? Be sure to include weblinks where appropriate. No bloviating without backup in here.

4. Do you know how to go back and read old topics before you bring them up all over again? If you do, then you would know that your point has been discussed at length on this board, with no success on your side.

Forum psuedo-intellectuals like you make me laugh.


What you are trying to do is sound superior and more well-informed with a vault of proof to dispute your ridiculous positions.

You are a windbag that would cite information written by bias sites or would post information that proves your point while ignoring companion information that disproves it.

You know that you are full of :q:q:q:q, You are like michael moore without the sense of humor.
 
KharmaDog said:
Forum psuedo-intellectuals like you make me laugh.


What you are trying to do is sound superior and more well-informed with a vault of proof to dispute your ridiculous positions.

You are a windbag that would cite information written by bias sites or would post information that proves your point while ignoring companion information that disproves it.

You know that you are full of :q:q:q:q, You are like michael moore without the sense of humor.

You, my friend, have been de-cloaked as a drive-by name-calling poster with little if no real knowledge of politics and little if no desire to debate in a logical or sensible manner.

People like you don't belong on this forum. You'll be ignored and you won't be around much longer.
 
fossten said:
3. Can you cite, with detailed facts and support to prove your point, what Bush has done to prove that he is dishonest? Be sure to include weblinks where appropriate. No bloviating without backup in here.



Hmmm - Glad we found all those weapons of mass destruction in IRAQ.
 
Joeychgo said:
Hmmm - Glad we found all those weapons of mass destruction in IRAQ.

You reckon Saddam sold them to Iran? I mean, in the end, are they not all "brothers in arms"?
 
Joeychgo said:
Hmmm - Glad we found all those weapons of mass destruction in IRAQ.

Sigh. Joey, you want to go over this again? Explain to me how this proves that Bush was dishonest.

Come on. I'm loaded for bear. My clipboard is cocked and ready to fire.

Ready...aim...
 
fossten said:
You, my friend, have been de-cloaked as a drive-by name-calling poster with little if no real knowledge of politics and little if no desire to debate in a logical or sensible manner.

First, I am not your friend nor would I choose to associate with an ill informed, pompous windbag such as yourself. Your accusations of what my knowledge may or may not be are hollow as I have not chesn to participate in a debate with you as I believe in order to argue with a moron one must stoop to their level, which I care not to do. You assume what others know, and assume you know more, it's sad really, but amusing none the less.

I debate on another forum, where both right, left and those in between debate without resorting to the distorted or biased "proof" that seems to regularly pop up in this forum.

You would be laughed out of that forum for your arrogance and ignorance.

fossten said:
People like you don't belong on this forum. .

If by ""People like you" you mean those that don't the severe right or left dictate my beliefs and that I think for myself, then I agree. Perhaps this forum is best left to lemmings and sheep such as yourself.

fossten said:
You'll be ignored and you won't be around much longer.

People like you wouldn't ignore me, because you can't. You are an insecure child that would rise to the bait in order to try to prove yourself to botth yourself and others.

I merely visted this site because I was told that there were some major league fools here. Your name came up. I am unimpressed by the banter here and I doubt I would waste my time reading the garbage you post here anyway.
 
KharmaDog said:
First, I am not your friend nor would I choose to associate with an ill informed, pompous windbag such as yourself. Your accusations of what my knowledge may or may not be are hollow as I have not chesn to participate in a debate with you as I believe in order to argue with a moron one must stoop to their level, which I care not to do. You assume what others know, and assume you know more, it's sad really, but amusing none the less.

I debate on another forum, where both right, left and those in between debate without resorting to the distorted or biased "proof" that seems to regularly pop up in this forum. :bowrofl:

You would be laughed out of that forum for your arrogance and ignorance.



If by ""People like you" you mean those that don't the severe right or left dictate my beliefs and that I think for myself, then I agree. Perhaps this forum is best left to lemmings and sheep such as yourself.



People like you wouldn't ignore me, because you can't. You are an insecure child that would rise to the bait in order to try to prove yourself to botth yourself and others.

I merely visted this site because I was told that there were some major league fools here. Your name came up. I am unimpressed by the banter here and I doubt I would waste my time reading the garbage you post here anyway.

It's interesting, the contradictions. First you presume to know me, which you do not. You say I am not your friend, but make it clear that that is your choice, not mine. I wonder if you even have any friends.

You resort to name calling, while you proudly state that on your "other forum" nobody bothers with all that "proof" stuff. I guess they all get on there and take turns calling each other names. "No real debate going on there, and don't you forget it!"

You must be unimpressed by the banter here because people on this forum tend to keep their name-calling somewhat in check, as opposed to spewing hate and filth like you've just done. Your rhetoric is a classic example of the kind of hate one would find at moveon.org or DemocratUnderground. You'd best stay there, because although we posters on this site go at each other a lot, we at least take time out to actually debate an issue.

Your kind never bothers to argue facts or issues because they are too busy taking potshots at each other. It's also interesting that you don't mention the name of the "other" forum. Wonder why that is.

You've admitted that you don't even care to join in the discussions here, so one can only presume that you are just spewing drive-by hate to see what kind of amusement you can derive from it.

You've definitely gotten one thing right: It's impossible to argue with a moron. I will stop trying.
 
KharmaDog said:
I merely visted this site because I was told that there were some major league fools here. Your name came up. I am unimpressed by the banter here and I doubt I would waste my time reading the garbage you post here anyway.

Well let me be the first to say good bye. You've come on strong, attacking board members, but you haven't offered anything even resembling thoughtful conversation or debate.

You seem to think your attitude is enough to compensate for your ignorance. But, if you don't mind, let us all know what community it is that you participate that embraces your special kind of anger and twaddle.
 
Calabrio said:
Well let me be the first to say good bye. You've come on strong, attacking board members, but you haven't offered anything even resembling thoughtful conversation or debate.

Did you read his very first post (I think it was his first) on Ann Coulter? I thought it painted her near perfect even if it was mean spirited, but then again we're talking about Coulter... What goes around comes around.
 
Calabrio said:
Well let me be the first to say good bye. You've come on strong, attacking board members, but you haven't offered anything even resembling thoughtful conversation or debate.

You seem to think your attitude is enough to compensate for your ignorance. But, if you don't mind, let us all know what community it is that you participate that embraces your special kind of anger and twaddle.


Ask and ye shall receive.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t405221.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/...id=366891&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=63

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t383177.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f64/t400328.html

This is a movie review site, but I recognize the MO in his language and lack of grammar. Wonder who invited him over here? Phil? Johnny? Likely. Barry? Not necessarily. These guys must have been getting desperate.
 
fossten said:
You say I am not your friend, but make it clear that that is your choice, not mine. I wonder if you even have any friends.

Save the highschool debating tactics for people who are impressed by it. You once again sound childish, it's almost as good as pointing out typos.


fossten said:
You resort to name calling, while you proudly state that on your "other forum" nobody bothers with all that "proof" stuff.

By putting the word'proof' in quotes I was mocking the right wing blogs that you hold up as examples of evidence. You either chose to ignore that or didn't get it.


fossten said:
Your rhetoric is a classic example of the kind of hate one would find at moveon.org or DemocratUnderground. You'd best stay there, because although we posters on this site go at each other a lot, we at least take time out to actually debate an issue.

I actually don't bother with those sites. I find extremism on either side a patheic waste of life. As I have looked back on some of your debates, I am not impressed. It's like watching Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'rielly spew thier misinformation and refuse any actual facts tht contradict their beliefs. That is not a debate, that is an argument between tow or more parties who refuse to enter a discussion with an open mind.


fossten said:
Your kind never bothers to argue facts or issues because they are too busy taking potshots at each other.

Actually I would debate issues with someone who could debate. I have seen in your posts that you pontificate your beliefs. There is a difference.

fossten said:
It's also interesting that you don't mention the name of the "other" forum. Wonder why that is.

Because windbags like you are not welcome there. Nor would I risk contaminating such a site. You can revel in being a slightly loudmouth fish in a small pond. I won't be around for much longer.

fossten said:
You've definitely gotten one thing right: It's impossible to argue with a moron. I will stop trying.

Oh, how clever, trying to turn my own words on me. You're snappy.

Actually you won't stop trying. You already said you would ignor me, but you can't. As I have already stted,"People like you wouldn't ignore me, because you can't. You are an insecure child that would rise to the bait in order to try to prove yourself to botth yourself and others."

You are living up to all the PM's that I am recieving from other members about you.
 
Ah welcome KharmaDog,

Quite the little splash you are making here.

I see you made friends right off the bat with Fossten. :D

I would be more than happy to engage you in a civil debate. However, feel free to put on the flack jacket because I already sense that many of your opinions are by-products of the drive-by media and we on the Right just can't resist taking our potshots you know.

Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly. I see you have your ducks lined up. Best of luck knocking them down. If is tough to debunk the truth when it is laid out in front of you.

Hey, I would love to 'infiltrate' your civil political board where all the 'intellectuals' reside. From all the PM's you are receiving over there, we must be getting alot more 'views' on these threads in this forum. Good for us. The more the merrier I always say. Hey, prod some of your companions to post here instead of just lurk. We need some fresh meat to chew on.:D
 
MonsterMark said:
I see you made friends right off the bat with Fossten. :D


What's it up to now Fossten?... Fifteen, twenty people you've made quick 'friends' with right off the bat? Lol...
 
95DevilleNS said:
What's it up to now Fossten?... Fifteen, twenty people you've made quick 'friends' with right off the bat? Lol...
Like I care about lefties liking me. Don't make me laugh. I know the score - you guys have so much rage and hate it's impossible for you all to keep from getting angry and vindictive. (Not you personally, Deville, you seem to keep your cool better than most. I still think you're a closet conservative - come over to the light side of the force, Luke :D )

I don't expect anything but hatred and vitriol and name-calling from the lefties on this site. The only thing I've ever maintained is that I expect to be treated the same as everybody else.
 

Members online

Back
Top