Look guy, you are just not picking up.
To compare the reliability you have to look at intervals meaning what issues are happening with 2000, 2001 and 2002, when they respectively hit an equal mileage, hopefully at as close as possible same respective age. Here have a little table
Year Mileage age(years) problems
2000 100000 10 broken tensioners
2000 100000 9.5 broken tensioners, wheel bearings
2001 100000 9.75 ...............QUOTE]
LOL! So..... if the 4 year newer car fails the same part at only 60k, then "you" will ignore the data cause it ain't 10 years old yet?
You don't understand what opinions are do you???
you get that is an example of what is failing what intervals correct? not what fails specifically at 100,000 you can break it down as far as you want. Tables are also not opinions, so I wonder about you knowing what one is, it is data that does not have an opinion of its own.
Perhaps, maybe if it is a table best tasting chips to me.....
so again, why is the 2002 the most reliable, oh wait, that's the opinion part isn't it, you don't have a reason it's your opinion. I get it now, since I asked you to prove it several times and you didn't you think I don't understand opinions, when you implied it as fact, I just didn't make the jump to that was your opinion. Don't worry I get it now, thanks for learnin silly dumb ol me on what them there pionion thingys are...