Are you here to discuss something or to be foxpaws e-knight in shining armor?
The last person to actively interject religion and to actively lash out at a commentator because of their own sensitive, personal religiosity, was, infact, Foxpaws with her radical, politically expedient attack and misrepresentation of Glenn Beck in another thread. That's what Fossten clearly appears to be referencing.
And the only person who referenced "damning to hell" specifically was, again, foxpaws.
But thanks for stopping by, brave sir e-knights.
....and on topic.
There's an old quote that is relevant here.
I make it a principle to be willing to compromise but I will never compromise on my principles.
There was no option of a principled compromise on this issue with Obama. Efforts were made by Republicans.
But when you support limited government, and the opposition supports statism, there is no compromise position there.
This healthcare bill is a violation of the basic founding principles of the country.
The federal government does not have the constitutional authority to enact such requirements or control. The debate SHOULD end at that.
But pragmatically, without regard to the constitution.
We can't afford this bill. It will hasten the economic collapse of the country.
It's going to damage the economy.
It's going to reduce the quality of health care.
It's going to stifle innovation and creation within the health care and medicine industries.
And it's going to be massively invasive into our private lives. Infact, it gives the federal government permission into every aspect of out lives.
Furthermore, the bill goes beyond healthchare, it has hidden provisions within it, including the take over of the student loan programs. So it's not just a health care bill, it's also a take over of education.
As Fossten pointed out, even the NY Times has reported that this bill is about redistribution of wealth.
It's interesting, when Obama was elected, we saw this:
But once there was some pushback, the administration and the media backed away from that. Suddenly those of us who identified this agenda as such were labelled "kooks" by the administration and their surrogates in the media. Now that the bill is passed, they reluctant start to recognize the truth.
As Fossten posted on the last page, from the NY Times:
In Health Bill, Obama Attacks Wealth Inequality
For all the political and economic uncertainties about health reform, at least one thing seems clear: The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality since inequality began rising more than three decades ago.
