And if he is wrong, then what?
The bigger threat is a dirty bomb that gets into terrorists hands. I didn't see anything said about that (though maybe I missed it).
The fact is that Ahmadinejad has said he wants to wipe Israel off the map and Iran has VERY close ties to all the terrorist organizations in the Middle East.
Then he turns around and crafts statements meant for Western audiences saying he has no interest in nuclear weapons. Why should we believe him?
One of the big inconsistencies I have seen from a lot of the anti-war movement (whether Leftist, or Ron Paul supporters) is that they are willing to blindly trust Iran when they tell westerners what they want to hear but will not trust their own elected officials and "experts" here in America. While I can appreciate the idea that very few elected officials in America warranty must trust, they certainly deserve more then Ahmadinejad who is blatantly two-faced.
If Iran gets a nuke of any sort, then Pandora's box has been opened and there is no way to undo that. Considering their stated intentions toward Israel (derived from their religious views), I think it is VERY foolish to not take the threat seriously.