dertyclown
Dedicated LVC Member
what would it matter no matter what I say you will just make up a fact that proves me worng. so why even try you are nothing but :bsflag:
barry2952 said:Could you just try answering the question? What has GWB
done for the American people in 4+ years?
You ignored my question first, why should I bother with yours? Especially when I am unclear as to the purpose of your question as it relates to this thread. I suspected it to be nothing more than an attempt to deflect the conversation and bash the President at the same time.barry2952 said:Thank you, that's all I asked for. Anyone else?
Enjoy your trip. Tell Mickey we said hi.MonsterMark said:Hey, guys on the right. Let's help Barry out. Post as many POSITIVES as you can. I have to take my kids to Florida right now. I'll be gone for a week. I'll see if I can check in.
With my wife and 3 daughters, we go through a lot of TP in my house, let me tell ya.dertyclown said:lets just say this thread sucks and will be reduced to talking about more improtant things. like how many sheets of TP I use after a big a$$ dump. :woowoo2:
ya when I moved out I was shocked at how lond one roll lasted TP goes a long way.Kbob said:With my wife and 3 daughters, we go through a lot of TP in my house, let me tell ya.
Here's one:barry2952 said:Kbob,
What question didn't I answer?
Dertyclown is his own person, whatever he believes. But keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better about yourself.barry2952 said:If dertyclown is one of your novice conservatives, you've got problems.
Kbob said:Here's one:
"You're saying that GWB and CR knew before 9/11 that all the different intelligence agencies were not communicating properly. Is this part of the 9/11 report or just your opinion?"
I believe the logic was that IF Bush knew, then Clinton had to know as well. Either way it's speculation.JohnnyBz00LS said:Gee, the GOP seems to think Clinton was aware of this, so it isn't a stretch to presume GWB and CR knew it, or at least they should have. What's their excuse again?
MonsterMark said:Raised the teaching standards and level of Education for our young.
See ya.
I would like to see some proof that this isn't working besides a biased opinion please. And what exactly is the governor of Wisconsin doing to help education? My guess is more money down the drain.mespock said:Sorry spend more time in a school - This hasn't happened!! How many left behind children do you want! To See! Mr Bush's plan may sound good No Child Left Behind but there are schools of them throughout the US..
All he did was test kids!! I guess a test will help struggling kids!!
What it did do is teach school Districts to teach to a test so they look good!! And sorry I'm not one!!
I still do what I've done for 22 years of teaching...
Reach out to all children I can.. Present quality lessons... and attempt to meet the need of every pupil...
I didn't need a test to do this and it can't be tested!!
So please don't tell me that GW did well for education!! I haven't seen a President do this yet!!
Now we do have a Governor in the State of Wisconsin trying hard to help education!!
Kbob said:I believe the logic was that IF Bush knew, then Clinton had to know as well. Either way it's speculation.
JohnnyBz00LS said:NEGLIGENCE IS IN-EXCUSABLE. IMPEACH GEORGE W. BUSH!! :Bang
I would have never guessed that you guys wanted to impeach Bush. (mock surprise)JohnnyBz00LS said:No speculation at all about what Bush did or didn't know pre-9/11. No speculation required either about GW's attempts to cover his tracks and deceive the voting public pre 11/2/04. See post in this thread about the recently declassified sections of the 9/11 Comission report:
Voters left clueless about pre-9/11 truths
NEGLIGENCE IS IN-EXCUSABLE. IMPEACH GEORGE W. BUSH!!
:Bang
Hahahaha! I'm laughing at myself because at first I thought you were either on drugs or lost. But now I realize you were just answering the thread topic question. That's what happens when you chase rabbits. ( :slam to myself)Joeychgo said:Really, the answer depends on the sale contract and due dilligence. Did the seller agree to hold you harmless from previous liabilities? Did you do sufficient research to learn if such a problem exists? Did the seller know and reveal that to you?