If you google helms it is a Ford and Lincoln affiliated site. Fill out some online forms and you can get your own build sheet for your car. Here is the link for you below:
https://www.shopfordgear.com/dept_prod.asp?dept_id=28
I did this on my Continental. Deluxe build sheets are $48.00 USD It decodes your vin #, where the car was built, all the options, including how many units were produced. I don't know for sure if it will tell you how many LSE's were built but will tell you total production LS's were built for your year.
As does Wikipedia.
1999 - 26,368
2000 - 51,039
2001 - 39,787
2002 - 39,775
2003 - 33,581
2004 - 27,066
2005 - 19,109
2006 - 8,797
As does Wikipedia.
1999 - 26,368
2000 - 51,039
2001 - 39,787
2002 - 39,775
2003 - 33,581
2004 - 27,066
2005 - 19,109
2006 - 8,797
Ok that's total production. So what can we assume % of LSE is ? 5%, 10% of total production for LSE years ?
The '99 production really should be counted with the '00 as they were still MY 2000.
Ive heard the 1st gen lse is more rare than 2nd gen ( ? )
I've seen several Gen 2s but not a single Gen 1 LSE in person.
LSE locally but not sure if it is an '04 or '05. Is there a way to tell without looking at the VIN?
not that I know of, they are essentially the exact same car.
also it should be noted, there are probably more than a few fake LSEs out there, it seems that more and more base or sport LSs getting the LSE treatment (well a lot less of late...)
Didn't the 02 LSE have the most distinguishing features of the run ? (Bumpers, wheels, grille, skirts, tails, plate surround)
I think the Gen 1 LSE is more distinguishable because I think it looks awkward.
I think the Gen 1 LSE is more distinguishable because I think it looks awkward.
i think its the side skirts, they kinda stick out a little bit depending on the angle you look at them, unlike the 2nd gen where it is just flat.
GEN 1 is going to be more rare. It was only made for one year where as the GEN 2 was made for 3 years. Simple mathematics. I think the GEN 1 is more appealing.
Awkward ? How so ? Is there really that much difference in aesthetics ? I like the 1st gen tails much better & LSE bumper is what makes or breaks the 1st gen. IMO, the front end on either gen with standard bumper is just ok but slap an lse or sport bumper on it and it's suddenly hell yeah !
It would be simple mathematics only if they had a set number of LSEs produced each year and it never changed. Without facts, it's only a probability. Come on, you worked in insurance! Is it a fact that driving for 2 years means you'll get in twice as many accidents? Or is it just more probable?
Take this as my opinion, obviously. The skirts and rear valence just look like cheap aftermarket glue-ons IMO. The 2nd Gen has a nicer, cleaner rear bumper with exhaust cutouts sitting a bit higher. The Gen 1 LSE valence gives the car a low-butt look, almost diaper-butt look. As for the front Gen 1 LSE bumper, the inset part around the foglights make the mouth of the lower grille opening look like it's got puffy fish lips. The marker lights also stand out way too much, but that could just be Gen-2 LSE brainwashing, since I barely notice them on my own Gen 1 Sport.
But I'm sitting here without an LSE.