Senate Confirms Alito to Supreme Court

Calabrio

Dedicated LVC Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
8,793
Reaction score
3
Location
Sarasota
Senate Confirms Alito to Supreme Court
Jan 31 11:27 AM US


By JESSE J. HOLLAND
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. became the nation's 110th Supreme Court justice on Tuesday, confirmed with the most partisan victory in modern history after a fierce battle over the future direction of the high court.

The Senate voted 58-42 to confirm Alito _ a former federal appellate judge, U.S. attorney, and conservative lawyer for the Reagan administration from New Jersey _ as the replacement for retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been a moderate swing vote on the court.

All but one of the Senate's majority Republicans voted for his confirmation, while all but four of the Democrats voted against Alito.

That is the smallest number of senators in the president's opposing party to support a Supreme Court justice in modern history. Chief Justice John Roberts got 22 Democratic votes last year, and Justice Clarence Thomas _ who was confirmed in 1991 on a 52-48 vote _ got 11 Democratic votes.

Alito watched the final vote from the White House's Roosevelt Room with his family. He was to be sworn in by Roberts at the Supreme Court in a private ceremony later in the day, in plenty of time for him to appear with President Bush at the State of the Union speech Tuesday evening.

Alito will be ceremonially sworn in a second time at a White House East Room appearance on Wednesday.

With the confirmation vote, O'Connor's resignation became official. She resigned in July but agreed to remain until her successor was confirmed. She was in Arizona Tuesday teaching a class at the University of Arizona law school.

Underscoring the rarity of a Supreme Court justice confirmation, senators answered the roll by standing one by one at their desks as their names were called, instead of voting and leaving the chamber. Alito and Roberts are the first two new members of the Supreme Court since 1994.

Alito is a longtime federal appeals judge, having been confirmed by the Senate by unanimous consent on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia on April 27, 1990. Before that, he worked as New Jersey's U.S. attorney and as a lawyer in the Justice Department for the conservative Reagan administration.

It was his Reagan-era work that caused the most controversy during his three-month candidacy for the high court.

Alito replaces O'Connor, the court's first female justice and a key moderate swing vote on issues like assisted suicide, campaign finance law, the death penalty, affirmative action and abortion.

Critics who mounted a fierce campaign against his nomination noted that while he worked in the solicitor general's office for President Reagan, he suggested that the Justice Department should try to chip away at abortion rights rather than mount an all-out assault. He also wrote in a 1985 job application for another Reagan administration post that he was proud of his work helping the government argue that "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion."

Now, Alito says, he has great respect for Roe as a precedent but refused to commit to upholding it in the future. "I would approach the question with an open mind and I would listen to the arguments that were made," he told senators at his confirmation hearing earlier this month.

Democrats weren't convinced, with liberals even unsuccessfully trying to rally support to filibuster Alito on Monday. "The 1985 document amounted to Judge Alito's pledge of allegiance to a conservative radical Republican ideology," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said before the vote.

They also repeatedly questioned Alito at his five-day confirmation hearing after he would not discuss his opinions about abortion or other contentious topics. At one point, his wife, Martha-Ann, started crying and left the hearing room as her husband's supporters defended him from the Democratic questioning.

"To Judge Alito, I say you deserve a seat on the Supreme Court," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.

Alito's path to the Supreme Court is infused with New Jersey connections. Born in Trenton as the son of an Italian immigrant, he attended Princeton University. He headed to Connecticut to receive his law degree, graduating from Yale University in 1975. His late father, Samuel Alito Sr., was the director of New Jersey's Office of Legislative Services from 1952 to 1984. Alito's sister, Rosemary, is a top employment lawyer in New Jersey.

Alito was not the White House's first choice _ or even second choice _ for the Supreme Court. Bush picked Roberts when O'Connor first announced she was stepping down last year.

After Roberts was promoted to the top spot after Chief Justice William Rehnquist died, the White House against passed over Alito for the vacant seat, instead selecting White House counsel Harriet Miers.

Miers' withdrawal following a barrage of conservative criticism in late October finally brought Alito's name to the forefront, although he then had to contend with constant references as "Scalito" or "Scalia-lite," references to his judicial similarity to Justice Antonin Scalia.

"I'm my own person. And I'm not like any other justice on the Supreme Court now or anybody else who served on the Supreme Court in the past," Alito said at his confirmation hearing.

___
 
It's official - the wacko leftist Fiberals have lost control of the government!!!

*owned*
 
Repugs: Yay!

Fiberals: AAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHH! [Self-flagellation and frothing]
 
barry2952 said:
Funny, that's how I've always pictured you.

You picture me the way I want you to, barry, that's half the fun. You Fibs are so impressionable. :D
 
Strange, I had a slightly different my mental image of fossten. :D

TIMMY!!

412_timmy_out_of_control.gif
 
That's cruel and unusual. But then again, so is he.
 
And I should let these PERSONAL ATTACKS continue?

I declare open season on Johnny and Barry. Have at it guys.

Let's see how long it takes before they scream?
 
I love it. You guys do it all the time. Skin a little thin? Having trouble recognizing a joke?
 
barry2952 said:
I love it. You guys do it all the time. Skin a little thin? Having trouble recognizing a joke?
Oh, I see. Now you want to disguise the personal attack as a joke. Hummm. Interesting.
 
MonsterMark said:
And I should let these PERSONAL ATTACKS continue?

I declare open season on Johnny and Barry. Have at it guys.

Let's see how long it takes before they scream?


BRING IT ON!!

This place could use some laughs. :cool:
 
Maybe your Moniker should be.......

Maybe your Moniker should be JohnnyDr00ls. Because every time the republicans make inroads towards normalcy, Johnny drools at the mere fact that another one of his Dumbocrats has lost out on the oppurtunity to flush yet another part of this great country down the toilet. Like I keep saying, get over it, your guy lost. Nothing worse than a cry baby sore loser. Kerry looked so despondent last night during the speech, and even more so this morning talking to Katie on good morning America. If he get his head any further up his AZZ it might just make it's way back to his shoulders again. And Barry, they do have operations available now that can separate you and Johnny. Unfortunately because the two of you are connected at the head, you will have to share one brain. Oh, but that's what you do now, I guess it won't be much of a change.
 
bufordtpisser said:
And Barry, they do have operations available now that can separate you and Johnny. Unfortunately because the two of you are connected at the head, you will have to share one brain. Oh, but that's what you do now, I guess it won't be much of a change.

That Commodore they are using must have some kind of 'network' connection. ;)
 
bufordtpisser said:
Maybe your Moniker should be JohnnyDr00ls. Because every time the republicans make inroads towards normalcy, Johnny drools at the mere fact that another one of his Dumbocrats has lost out on the oppurtunity to flush yet another part of this great country down the toilet. Like I keep saying, get over it, your guy lost. Nothing worse than a cry baby sore loser. Kerry looked so despondent last night during the speech, and even more so this morning talking to Katie on good morning America. If he get his head any further up his AZZ it might just make it's way back to his shoulders again. And Barry, they do have operations available now that can separate you and Johnny. Unfortunately because the two of you are connected at the head, you will have to share one brain. Oh, but that's what you do now, I guess it won't be much of a change.

And your post has WHAT to do w/ the topic of this thread (Alito being confirmed)?? Show me where I've said ONE bad thing about Alito, or where I'm "crying" over his confirmation, EVER.

Oh........ I get it. This was a lame attempt at a personal attack! Hahahahaha, good one. You got me there, pal. :woowoo2: Keep 'em coming, laughter is the best medicine.
 
on topic-
Alito has been confirmed. It is entirely possible that Roe v. Wade will be overturned within the next couple years.


Which political party will this help or hurt most?
When abortion law ceases to be a legal issue, and it becomes a debate no longer defined by it's polar extremes, what will happen?

Republicans will have to specifically explain just how "anti-abortion" they are. Democrats will have to clearly state just how "pro-abortion access" they really are too. It'll no longer be enough to say I'm "Pro-anything" unless you're one of the people who think abortion should be absolutely illegal or unrestricted.

Democrats will no longer retain support simply because they "support Roe". Republicans will no longer retain support just because they challenged Roe.

I'm glad, I think abortion is a political and moral issue that should be debated, not isolated from the political process by bad law. But this will greatly complicate the political scene.
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
And your post has WHAT to do w/ the topic of this thread (Alito being confirmed)?? Show me where I've said ONE bad thing about Alito, or where I'm "crying" over his confirmation, EVER.

Oh........ I get it. This was a lame attempt at a personal attack! Hahahahaha, good one. You got me there, pal. :woowoo2: Keep 'em coming, laughter is the best medicine.
Bryan, let me handle this.

I'm going to start counting the threads where you or barry resort to personally attacking me versus actually posting to the thread topic.

It's already at 3.

How pathetic, but typical.

Face it: You Fibs have NO SUBSTANCE TO OFFER. You can't do anything but attack me. Fine, no problem, I can take it. I don't have to respond in kind in order to consistently tie you in knots, and I can prove it. Bring it on.
 
You keep calling us Fiberals or your slur d'jour and you'll keep getting slammed.

Calling us fiberals is calling us liars. That is clearly a personal attack. You stop and I'll stop. Seem fair?
 
barry2952 said:
You keep calling us Fiberals or your slur d'jour and you'll keep getting slammed.

Calling us fiberals is calling us liars. That is clearly a personal attack. You stop and I'll stop. Seem fair?

This goes for you as well as Johnny:

Nothing is fair when it comes to you. You people call us Repugs and have never stopped that. You NEVER hesitate to call names when it suits you. What I always try to do is use the term 'Fiberal' in a general manner, not directed at any one person. Of course when I do that, you and Johnny go NUTS trying to bait me into singling somebody out. Then you call me names when I don't fall for your tactics. It's obvious that you are TRYING to get me to attack you so you can try to pull me down to your level. I will not succumb to such low-level, 5th-grade tactics. I will simply say, if the shoe fits, wear it.

You, ON THE OTHER HAND, specifically target me for attacks and insults, often INSTEAD of actually debating the issues with FACTS (I know that's a bad word with you guys).

That's the difference between you and me on this issue. If you can't handle the debate, keep attacking me. It only reinforces the stereotype of you as a liberal with no ideas, agenda, or common sense. You paint YOURSELF as a hating, bashing, angry, tunnel visioned liberal. I will not stand in your way when you choose to do this, nor will I take it personally, as I know that you don't really know me, nor do you know enough to debate intelligently. I know that your anger fuels your attacks, and that stems from your own problems, which have nothing to do with me.

I will, however, continue to highlight your attacks, as they amuse me and everybody else on my side of the aisle.
 
Bravo

fossten said:
This goes for you as well as Johnny:

Nothing is fair when it comes to you. You people call us Repugs and have never stopped that. You NEVER hesitate to call names when it suits you. What I always try to do is use the term 'Fiberal' in a general manner, not directed at any one person. Of course when I do that, you and Johnny go NUTS trying to bait me into singling somebody out. Then you call me names when I don't fall for your tactics. It's obvious that you are TRYING to get me to attack you so you can try to pull me down to your level. I will not succumb to such low-level, 5th-grade tactics. I will simply say, if the shoe fits, wear it.

You, ON THE OTHER HAND, specifically target me for attacks and insults, often INSTEAD of actually debating the issues with FACTS (I know that's a bad word with you guys).

That's the difference between you and me on this issue. If you can't handle the debate, keep attacking me. It only reinforces the stereotype of you as a liberal with no ideas, agenda, or common sense. You paint YOURSELF as a hating, bashing, angry, tunnel visioned liberal. I will not stand in your way when you choose to do this, nor will I take it personally, as I know that you don't really know me, nor do you know enough to debate intelligently. I know that your anger fuels your attacks, and that stems from your own problems, which have nothing to do with me.

I will, however, continue to highlight your attacks, as they amuse me and everybody else on my side of the aisle.
:I :I :I :I :I :I :I

Very eloquently stated as usual. Glad I could be of some help in the humor department, but you guys don't need my help. Go back and read your posts and you will recieve all of the humor you need. Hell, I even put up a wireless connection in my house so that I could take the laptop along when I am on the throne. All that money saved on readers digest. What will I do with it?
 
MonsterMark said:
And I should let these PERSONAL ATTACKS continue?

I declare open season on Johnny and Barry. Have at it guys.

Let's see how long it takes before they scream?

David: Keep up the good work. You get personal attacks from these two because you constantly get the best of them in debate.
 
Calabrio said:
on topic-
Alito has been confirmed. It is entirely possible that Roe v. Wade will be overturned within the next couple years.


Which political party will this help or hurt most?
When abortion law ceases to be a legal issue, and it becomes a debate no longer defined by it's polar extremes, what will happen?

Republicans will have to specifically explain just how "anti-abortion" they are. Democrats will have to clearly state just how "pro-abortion access" they really are too. It'll no longer be enough to say I'm "Pro-anything" unless you're one of the people who think abortion should be absolutely illegal or unrestricted.

Democrats will no longer retain support simply because they "support Roe". Republicans will no longer retain support just because they challenged Roe.

I'm glad, I think abortion is a political and moral issue that should be debated, not isolated from the political process by bad law. But this will greatly complicate the political scene.


A couple points on this. First, even if Roe is overturned, it will not stop abortion. Upon overturning Roe, each state will have the power to decide what it wants to do regarding abortion.

Second, I support overturning Roe because it is simply a bad court decision. It is based on privacy rights that are not specifically set out in the Constitution -- this case is another where the Justices just made stuff up without any textual support. Now, I support a woman's right to choose (within limits), but doing it through the Roe decision is not the way to handle this.

Third, you will notice that the abortion debate in England is not as polarized and raucous as it is here in the US. The difference is that the abortion question in the UK was put through their legislature, debated in their legislature, and voted on by the people through their elected representatives. In other words, the abortion question in the UK was handled through the democratic process. Contrast that with our situation in the United States where the right to an abortion was decided by a handful of Judges disconnected from the democratic process. The abortion question should be decided by the people, not judges.

It remains to be seen how Alito will judge cases, but given his strong support for reading the Constitution as it is written and not implying any rights or priviledges that are not set out, I think he will be of a mind to overturn Roe, stare decisis or not.

BTW, have you seen the new dancing girl at the club. Her name is Starry Decisis!
 
ToddG said:
A couple points on this. First, even if Roe is overturned, it will not stop abortion. Upon overturning Roe, each state will have the power to decide what it wants to do regarding abortion.

Second, I support overturning Roe because it is simply a bad court decision. It is based on privacy rights that are not specifically set out in the Constitution -- this case is another where the Justices just made stuff up without any textual support. Now, I support a woman's right to choose (within limits), but doing it through the Roe decision is not the way to handle this.

Third, you will notice that the abortion debate in England is not as polarized and raucous as it is here in the US. The difference is that the abortion question in the UK was put through their legislature, debated in their legislature, and voted on by the people through their elected representatives. In other words, the abortion question in the UK was handled through the democratic process. Contrast that with our situation in the United States where the right to an abortion was decided by a handful of Judges disconnected from the democratic process. The abortion question should be decided by the people, not judges.

It remains to be seen how Alito will judge cases, but given his strong support for reading the Constitution as it is written and not implying any rights or priviledges that are not set out, I think he will be of a mind to overturn Roe, stare decisis or not.

BTW, have you seen the new dancing girl at the club. Her name is Starry Decisis!

Couldn't have said it better myself, Todd. Good job.

Roe is nothing more than a symbol of Judicial Legislation, which the Fiberals have wrapped themselves around as their last vestige of power. If Roe goes, so does judicial activism in their eyes (and in reality). And GOOD RIDDANCE.
 
fossten said:
Bryan, let me handle this.

I'm going to start counting the threads where you or barry resort to personally attacking me versus actually posting to the thread topic.

It's already at 3.

How pathetic, but typical.

Face it: You Fibs have NO SUBSTANCE TO OFFER. You can't do anything but attack me. Fine, no problem, I can take it. I don't have to respond in kind in order to consistently tie you in knots, and I can prove it. Bring it on.

Lighten up, Francis.

The only reason we pick on you is because you are so FUN to pick on! It's pure entertainment to watch your head spin like it has in the previous posts whenever someone gives you a sideways glance. Believe me, we don't even have to try to get a rise out of you.
:p
 
JohnnyBz00LS said:
Lighten up, Francis.

The only reason we pick on you is because you are so FUN to pick on! It's pure entertainment to watch your head spin like it has in the previous posts whenever someone gives you a sideways glance. Believe me, we don't even have to try to get a rise out of you.
:p


What are you doing, trying to copy me? :lol: :blah: Don't even try to backpedal and tapdance around this, Johnny. That will just make you look linguine-spined. At least stand strong for what you believe in: Hate and rhetoric. Nobody's fooled by your flat, insincere attempt to spin this to make it look like you are doing it for fun. Your anger shows through like a floodlight through cellophane.

I noticed that you are still focused on me, and every additional post that you direct at me personally just shows that you have nothing substantive to offer in the category of real debate.

Keep it up, it's hilarious.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top