Hey RRocket, :waving: I was wondering when you'd show up. Unfortunately you go over ground that has already been covered. Bush didn't vault himself up for his military service (call it what you like). But Kerry sure did and does on a daily basis. I think that warrants a little more proof. And I hate to get technical, but the Bush administration hasn't attacked Kerry's military service at all. You have a different opinion on this, but it's just that, an OPINION. I prefer to rely on facts, thank you. And it seems the "anyone but Bush" crowd reaches into our arctic neighbor as well, closing their eyes and plugging their noses while they pick through Kerry's crap looking for something good to eat. Look real close, I think he had a handful of peanuts and corn on the cob for dinner yesterday. Bon appetite!
And you're beating a dead horse with the whole "Bush lied" angle. Kerry would have invaded Iraq, too. So why aren't you trying to push Nader on us? He wouldn't have invaded Iraq. That's a rhetorical question. I know why, cause he can't beat Bush, the evil anti-Christ :dancefool .
The deaths that occurred during the sanctions (where did you get that ridiculously high number of 14 million? That's more than half their population
) were caused by Saddam himself. I believe we went over this before, too. RRocket: "Actually, yeah, it was, um, more like 100 million! Yeah, that's the ticket! You bunch of murdering Americans, you! You've all been brainwashed! Elect the right candidate and we'll be friends with you again after you give up your security, your guns, your jobs, your import protections, and your sovereignty." If we get attacked again, you're not going to like any president we have, and this includes Kerry.
And I'll give you a little military education, for free cause we're LvC bros: pre-emptive strikes have been around for a while now, and they work real good. Bush didn't invent it. If Iran wants to attack, let 'em come! I aint sceered. We'll blow the heck out of them, too! (Did that sound like the nut-hugging redneck you think us Republicans are?) No, if Iran attacks, it'll be after we're gone. They aren't that stupid. MEANWHILE they'll sure keep funding, training, and harboring terrorists as much as they can since that's the right thing to do in some peoples opinion. After all, we pushed them to it according to many. And according to your logic RRocket, Osama should naturally "prophecy" that the US will attack some nation that will be unable to defend itself again. That way he'll either look even more like a god when it happens, or we should heed his words and stand down the next time we see a threat emerging. We should just not worry about it until the world is at war and the price will be far greater then. Yup, makes sense to me. Please, give me a break. You say it's no wonder they follow him like he's god. It doesn't take much to impress you, does it. Osama's a god, and Saddams a friggin saint the way he was maliciously used by Reagan and didn't use gas and cried so much because the U.S. killed 60% of his people. Save your revisions on history, cause the only ones that are going to listen to you are your dreaded "nut-huggers".
I'm sure you're well meaning and truly believe the US will be better off with Kerry in the White House. Thanks for your concern. (I'm saying this jokingly in a good-natured, condescending manner) And thanks for the weather you've been sending us. It's the coolest summer ever!
