Time Magazine Massively Cops Out, Names Everybody Person of the Year

fossten said:
That's such a routine spewing of Democrat talking points I don't even know where to begin. Why don't we start with your oblivious ignoring of Calabrio's remarks? You have completely forgotten or are just willfully ignorant of the FACTS:

Bill Clinton used his presidential power to attempt to interfere in a civil suit by committing and suborning perjury. He tried to cover up an affair and attempted to tamper with a witness and obstruct justice. Then he lied about it straight to your face and everyone else's. As far as Paula Jones waiting to file the suit, she was within the statute of limitations, so what's your problem? She can file suit anytime she wants, it's her legal right, which by the way Clinton attempted to subvert.

The point I've made is that that is a disgrace for the leader of the free world to do such a thing. His law license was revoked and he was found in contempt of court, all the while brazenly attacking and assassinating the character of the investigator HIS justice department appointed to find out the facts. You Clinton apologists try to make this a personal thing, but he's the one who brought that house of cards down on himself.

Look at the big picture - he disgraced the office by his actions, and history will remember that. Too bad you and others like you are blind to those facts.

As far as an affair being his personal business, that's preposterous. We just had an outraged White House press corps screaming bloody murder about Laura Bush's malignant cancer on her leg that was removed. If anything is personal business, it would be medical information, but the press corps was in high dudgeon about not being informed about it sooner. So don't lecture me about how Clinton's affair, which was made public through HIS LYING AND BREAKING OF THE LAW, should be none of anybody else's business.

By the way, Deville, congratulations on being named TIME Mag's person of the year. I know you worked hard for it, and you deserve it, as does everyone else who was named.

You have shown your bias point of view towards Clinton time and time again, best president, worst president or mediocre president it wouldn't matter. All you see is "Democratic President" and we all know how you feel towards Democrats.

Hey look, I agree with you, Laura's cancer shouldn't have been public knowledge.

Yes, he did in lie, we all know this fact, point is, he shouldn't have been asked questions of a personal nature, especailly something about his and his wife's private sex life. Paula Jones being "harressed" in 1992 had nothing to do with Monica giving Bill a "BJ" in 1997, Monica did it willfully, she wasn't coerced or bullied into it. Add to it, Paula filed just three days prior to exceeding the statue. If you want to believe Jones just happened to file the lawsuit and it was only a coincidence that Bill was having an affair with Monica at the time go ahead.

Thanks, and a big pat on the back to you too, we're all winners.
 
95DevilleNS said:
You have shown your bias point of view towards Clinton time and time again, best president, worst president or mediocre president it wouldn't matter. All you see is "Democratic President" and we all know how you feel towards Democrats.

Hey look, I agree with you, Laura's cancer shouldn't have been public knowledge.

Yes, he did in lie, we all know this fact, point is, he shouldn't have been asked questions of a personal nature, especailly something about his and his wife's private sex life. Paula Jones being "harressed" in 1992 had nothing to do with Monica giving Bill a "BJ" in 1997, Monica did it willfully, she wasn't coerced or bullied into it. Add to it, Paula filed just three days prior to exceeding the statue. If you want to believe Jones just happened to file the lawsuit and it was only a coincidence that Bill was having an affair with Monica at the time go ahead.

Thanks, and a big pat on the back to you too, we're all winners.

Which just shows how ignorant you are of the facts. Monica Lewinsky WAS tied to the Paula Jones lawsuit, despite your ignorance and despite your protestations. But this has already been addressed on this forum before, and since you seem so unwilling to face facts, I'm not going to bother rehashing it.

Suffice it to say that you're wrong, and you don't even want to know the truth, because if you did, you'd do a simple google of the words Paula Jones Lewinsky affidavit. Then you can read up on how Clinton deliberately tried to tamper with a legal trial. This information is irrelevant of any bias I might have, it's public knowledge and you are willingly and willfully ignorant.

So be it.
 
fossten said:
Which just shows how ignorant you are of the facts. Monica Lewinsky WAS tied to the Paula Jones lawsuit, despite your ignorance and despite your protestations. But this has already been addressed on this forum before, and since you seem so unwilling to face facts, I'm not going to bother rehashing it.

Suffice it to say that you're wrong, and you don't even want to know the truth, because if you did, you'd do a simple google of the words Paula Jones Lewinsky affidavit. Then you can read up on how Clinton deliberately tried to tamper with a legal trial. This information is irrelevant of any bias I might have, it's public knowledge and you are willingly and willfully ignorant.

So be it.


I actually have read Lewinsky's affidavit, she denied (lied about) having sex with Clinton and she stated that Clinton did not haress her in any shape or form.

Merry Christmas Fossten.
 
Hey Fossie,
How many issues of Time have you bought so far, and how many hours have you spent holding it in front of yourself with one hand?:)
 
97silverlsc said:
Hey Fossie,
How many issues of Time have you bought so far, and how many hours have you spent holding it in front of yourself with one hand?:)

1. My name is David.
2. I don't read pathetic rags like Time Magazine.
3. Your second question is stupid and irrelevant to any topic ever discussed on this forum.
4. You are nothing but a pathetic troll with absolutely nothing substantive to contribute to this forum.
 
Fossten,

What did you expect since their cop-out fest began in 2001?? That year through his evil, Osama altered the world....and they copped out and picked Bush since it would have been too "insensitive" or whatever their excuse was.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top