MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
Here's one he could remove from the "Gene Pool"!
Don't you realize that guy is famous? He set the record for the 1st hybrid car to hit 100 mph.
US power and influence declines on Moronic Bush visions
- Thread starter 04SCTLS
- Start date
Don't you realize that guy is famous? He set the record for the 1st hybrid car to hit 100 mph.
MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
My Mom? She's wacko!!!
Tricky-Dick
Well-Known LVC Member
Don't you realize that guy is famous? He set the record for the 1st hybrid car to hit 100 mph.
Yeah, but he has a hard mountain to climb...his dad invented "The Internet" and "Post It" Notes!
MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
France and Germany elected conservative leaders that embrace the U.S. and her policies. They didn't run away from Bush.
How's that for starters?
You can't believe everything you hear on ABC and CNN.
Ya, huge Packer fan. Only made 5 games this year.
Did you enjoy the Bears / Packers game last week as much as I did? ROFL OWNED
France and Germany elected conservative leaders that embrace the U.S. and her policies. They didn't run away from Bush.
How's that for starters?
You can't believe everything you hear on ABC and CNN.
Remember something -
There will be a certain amount of votes that the dems will get this year SOLELY because of GW.
They wont be voting for democrats, but against republicans. And this will be mainly because of GW. So keep praising him. You just drive some people further into the democratic fold.
Right now, I am guessing we are likely to have either hillary or obama in the white house next year. Now, im not happy about this, but its looking like thats how it'll turn out.
MonsterMark
Dedicated LVC Member
It blows my mind that that could even be remotely possible. Both will be unmitigated disasters.
I'm telling you, if we let down our guard and elect a Dem, we will get attacked. Our enemies are patiently waiting for the opportunity.
Hillary will pull a Clinton and Obama will crawl into a shell.
There is no doubt that the liberally biased media has a profound effect on the unthinking masses in this country. As a whole, we are a stupid nation. The media steers popular thought. Lots of parrots out there.
And the last time I checked, GW wasn't running.
I think we need a Dem in office and in control of Congress when we get attacked again. People will then be able to make a clear-cut distinction between how Repubs protect the country and how Dems do.
A major city goes down, panic the likes we've never experienced will ensue. Oil, $200 or more a gallon. Looting out of control. The Dems will call for a military curfew.
Only then will we get past this 50/50 impass. The Dems had a nice 40 year run in the House and Senate. Time for the Repubs to get the same timetable.
ford nut
Local nut case
Wow she can look evil
She makes my ex look like a saint, just think of the pure hell Bill had to go though when she found out he was gettin BJ's in the office and its going to get out to the press
I'm not so sure we can predict how a democrat president and congressional democrats would handle a terrorist attack since democrats often lie about their intentions and don't follow through on what they say they intend to do as evidenced by what has transpired thus far with democrats holding a majority of congress and their numerous broken promises after the 2006 elections. So, while you may think that democrats will freeze and drop the ball should we be attacked, I think they are also capable of going off the deep end in the opposite direction. They may declare martial law, suspend the constitution, invent or increase taxes in a panic to raise revenue to fight terrorism, tank our economy and invade Mexico and Canada--all while blaming President Bush.
The point being is that the current crop of ultra-left-wing democrats are unpredictable.
I agree Hillary will - I honestly dont know enough about Obama to form an opinion - which is why I doubt I will be voting for him.
Obviously GW isnt running - but most people believe he has not been the best of presidents and he is taking the party as a whole down with him. Any republican will have to overcome the opinion people have of GW in order to be elected. To think GW doesnt have a negative impact on the republicans in this election is naive. He had a congressional rubber stamp his first 6 years in office, so dont blame congress, the republicans lost control of congress because of GW and that rubber stamp.
Thats what some of you have to realize. GW cost the republican party huge. Every time you see Pelosi up there - realize, GW put her there. If you realize that, then you will have a leg up on getting a republican candidate elected.
I honestly have no clue who to vote for yet. I could like Huckabee if he would stop injecting religon into every friggin speech - I could like Ron Paul if he was even close to electable. But I also fear the conservatives and their ability to appoint a few more Supreme Court justices should they win the white house again.
ford nut
Local nut case
:I
Couldnt agree with you more I I hear one more christian quote from Huckabee I am going to puke...... Ron Paul is toast too liberal for most conservatives.
Couldnt agree with you more I I hear one more christian quote from Huckabee I am going to puke...... Ron Paul is toast too liberal for most conservatives.
All this proves is the person writing the article not only hates Bush put also hates the US. Just another far left reporter of the news media, bet who ever wrote this article thinks the leader of Saudi Arabia is a Saint too.
"Obviously GW isnt running - but most people believe he has not been the best of presidents and he is taking the party as a whole down with him. "
similar to what happened after the mulroney years here. even when he didn't run, he took the whole conservative party with him. there wasn't a conservative that could get elected after him. the reform party took all the conservative side, and the liberals took the majority. good thing there isn't a secondary conservative party there, or it just might happen the same.
similar to what happened after the mulroney years here. even when he didn't run, he took the whole conservative party with him. there wasn't a conservative that could get elected after him. the reform party took all the conservative side, and the liberals took the majority. good thing there isn't a secondary conservative party there, or it just might happen the same.
I don't hear Huckabee constantly quoting the Bible. He's too smart for that because he knows it would upset a lot of people. It might be your perception that he constantly talks about the Bible because, like Mitt Romney, he's being bombarded with questions from the media about his religious faith and what role it would play in his decision-making as president.
History has judged him as arguably one of the greatest Presidents of the 20th century...
Fortunately over 50% of the country disagreed with you
A "C" student...at Yale (Which I have no doubt is better then what you could do at that time). Either way, how is that relevant?
WTF? Who ever said he was trying to be the smartest person in the room? You seem to have no idea what leadership is.
Stupider? Is that a word? (when you are attacking someones intellect, it helps if you use good grammar). You think Condi, Rummy, Ashcroft, Cheney, etc. are stupid? Lets compare your grades to theirs (grades seem to matter to you so much).
Doesn't like debate or critisism? He has 70-80% of the media actively working against him. How are you not forced to debate in those cercumstances?
God forbid he doesn't hold your lack of belief. This says more about your own personally arrogant bias against people of faith then anything else; basically, it exposes a large personal flaw on your part.
You also forget, this county was founded on Christian principals, and its roots are in Christianity.
You still haven't made the case here, though you have shown thta you don't use your head. Instead you use your emotions to make decisions; emotion over reason. The fact that you ignore reality, and look down on anyone with religious belief shows that you need to get over yourself.
Well theres the problem, your Canadian
.religion may not be a part of politics in Canada, but Canada isn' America.
But Canada isn't America, remember. Canada is effectively irrelevant on the world stage, in comparison to America.
It still hasn't been show that America is an "Empire".
The deficit is decreasing.
And what is this "we" stuff? I thought you were Canadian.
So America
be all about empire now? You obviously hae no clue how the govenment works or what the function of military is.
ford nut
Local nut case
I never said the bible MAC1
The guy cant open his yap without some christian overtones :shifty:
That is a big assumption. And, yes, it is only an assumption. There is no proof. I could go with his connections getting him into Yale, but he still had to do the work to get through on his own. His father wasn't much of anything back when he went to college anyhow. The highlights of Bush senior's carreer were long after that.
Again, large assumption. needs proof.
very few love him. I have yet to see anyone on this board who loves Bush. In fact, I have never even met a conservative who loves Bush. However, there are many, like you who have an irrational hartred for him based mostly on distortion and misinformation, if not outright lies. This is all that seems to fuel your worldview when it comes to America (it obviously isn't reason, logic, or reality).
______________________________________________
Interesting how you rely on a secondary source to spin what the "Project For The New American Century" advocates. Why don't you do a little research yourself;
http://www.newamericancentury.org/
If you are intellectually honest, you will find that what they advocate is much more benign they how it is spun in that article.
I'm not so sure we can predict how a democrat president and congressional democrats would handle a terrorist attack since democrats often lie about their intentions and don't follow through on what they say they intend to do as evidenced by what has transpired thus far with democrats holding a majority of congress and their numerous broken promises after the 2006 elections. So, while you may think that democrats will freeze and drop the ball should we be attacked, I think they are also capable of going off the deep end in the opposite direction. They may declare martial law, suspend the constitution, invent or increase taxes in a panic to raise revenue to fight terrorism, tank our economy and invade Mexico and Canada--all while blaming President Bush.
Good point.
Ah shagdrum,
I was wondering when you would chime in.
I read the link you posted about the new american century
as well but it wouldn't pull your chain the way my link did.
Things would get boring here if we all just complimented each other.
I was never comparing myself or my education with that of Bush. Whatever my opinion of Bush may be his winning of the presidency is quite an achievement which speaks for itself.
As to my spelling and grammar maybe you should look at your's before you point out mine.
You supposedly wrote a book so you should have higher standards
Examples
1. an irrational hartred- should be hatred
2. Bush senior's carreer- should be career
3. Lets compare your grades to theirs - should be their's
debate in those cercumstances?- should be circumstances.
4. The guy cant open his yap without some christian overtones - should be can't
5. Fortunately over 50% of the country disagreed with you- should be voters instead of country.
6. though you have shown thta you don't use your head- should be that instead of thta
Well theres the problem, your Canadian - should be there's
7. Doesn't like debate or critisism- should be criticism
8. You obviously hae no clue how the govenment works or what the function of military is.- should be has not hae and government not govenment and function of (the) military is.
Nobody usually plays grammar police on boards but you ironically have made 10 spelling errors in your post while criticising
my use of the english language.
Perhaps you should run spell check and re read what you write before posting.
There are always errors like these in your posts.
Anyways I just wanted to wish everyone a happy new year
and more interesting provoking posts in 2008.
I was wondering when you would chime in.
I read the link you posted about the new american century
as well but it wouldn't pull your chain the way my link did.
Things would get boring here if we all just complimented each other.
I was never comparing myself or my education with that of Bush. Whatever my opinion of Bush may be his winning of the presidency is quite an achievement which speaks for itself.
As to my spelling and grammar maybe you should look at your's before you point out mine.
You supposedly wrote a book so you should have higher standards
Examples
1. an irrational hartred- should be hatred
2. Bush senior's carreer- should be career
3. Lets compare your grades to theirs - should be their's
debate in those cercumstances?- should be circumstances.
4. The guy cant open his yap without some christian overtones - should be can't
5. Fortunately over 50% of the country disagreed with you- should be voters instead of country.
6. though you have shown thta you don't use your head- should be that instead of thta
Well theres the problem, your Canadian - should be there's
7. Doesn't like debate or critisism- should be criticism
8. You obviously hae no clue how the govenment works or what the function of military is.- should be has not hae and government not govenment and function of (the) military is.
Nobody usually plays grammar police on boards but you ironically have made 10 spelling errors in your post while criticising
my use of the english language.
Perhaps you should run spell check and re read what you write before posting.
There are always errors like these in your posts.
Anyways I just wanted to wish everyone a happy new year
and more interesting provoking posts in 2008.
I wasn't sure what you meant by "christian quote". I thought you must be referring to the Bible because you used the term "quote". I'm still not sure what you're referring to. What do you mean by "christian overtones"? Do you have an example?