Fastbird
Well-Known LVC Member
Something is up with mine.....went from 25-28 on the highway to 21 on the highway after installation of a Magnaflow Cat-Back.
Thats probably about right. I am guessing you bought the exhaust for its sound. Slight changes with intake and exhaust can definately change the factory "stock" ratings in regards to mileage.Fastbird said:Something is up with mine.....went from 25-28 on the highway to 21 on the highway after installation of a Magnaflow Cat-Back.
Fla02LS said:Thats probably about right. I am guessing you bought the exhaust for its sound. Slight changes with intake and exhaust can definately change the factory "stock" ratings in regards to mileage.
Makes you wanna take a second look at that "less restrictive" aspect of the magnaflow for the LS. Its sounds better but the overall big picture might just not be as good as it seems. On big power cars like the T/A its a different story because those stock setups were awful, and if when you modified the intake then the exhaust needed to be modded accordingly. The LS might actually have a very well engineered exhaust.Fastbird said:This is semi-true. I'll agree that many cars sold have "tuned" exhaust systems. However, I've owned quite a few cars and nearly every one got an exhaust system, and NEVER have I seen a drop in fuel economy with an addition of a cat-back exhaust that's less restrictive than the OEM system. Especially not a drop in economy to the tune of 5+ MPG.
Fla02LS said:Makes you wanna take a second look at that "less restrictive" aspect of the magnaflow for the LS. Its sounds better but the overall big picture might just not be as good as it seems. On big power cars like the T/A its a different story because those stock setups were awful, and if when you modified the intake then the exhaust needed to be modded accordingly. The LS might actually have a very well engineered exhaust.
Yep, that and the VVT. Intake was also modified.Fastbird said:True.......but the power gains people have seen on the dyno (~30 RWHP with various Cat-backs and CAI) don't lie.
Another perspective........wasn't a major contributing factor to the 03+ LS's increased power rating (284 or something like that up from 252) the newly revised exhaust system???
Best of mine was a 370 mile trip that included the mountains of Western Maryland. Speeds from 55 to 80 @ 25.0 by the computer and 24.9 by hand. No AC, just the windows closed and the vent on (it was cool out).z1069 said:Maybe some new people can post their findings.
KC_Steve said:OK, I seem to be on the lower end of the spectrum too! I have a 2002 LS V8 with 34K. The best I have average is 21 on the highway, and a consistent 16 - 17 average per tank with a 50/50 mix of city/highway driving. I have been very easy on the pedal too! The sticker from the window showed 17/25, but I have yet to see it.
Also, my AC Filter shows 24% left. From reading through this thread, how do I go about changing it? I seen a mention of it, but not how too??
Thanks,
Steve
Drnaline said:48,000 miles. 60 miles jont from Santa Fe to Albuquerque. All stock 01 LS8 except for drilled air box. 33.4 MPG @ 65/70 MPH.