Who's next?

[fossten]

Not the sole reason, but If Iraq wasn't a candyland of crude, would we really care if Saddam was killing his people?

Wait a minute. You just contradicted yourself in one sentence. I didn't think that could be done, actually.

You're saying that we cared about him killing his people BECAUSE he had oil, but if he didn't have oil, we wouldn't have cared? Which is it, did we go in because of oil or because of him killing his people?

I thought you had acknowledged that Bush didn't lie about going into Iraq. If that's true, then why are you once again accusing him of doing so?

There is NO EVIDENCE THAT BUSH LIED about going into Iraq, and THAT INCLUDES OIL as a motivation.

 

[TheDude]

Wait a minute. You just contradicted yourself in one sentence. I didn't think that could be done, actually.

You're saying that we cared about him killing his people BECAUSE he had oil, but if he didn't have oil, we wouldn't have cared? Which is it, did we go in because of oil or because of him killing his people?

I thought you had acknowledged that Bush didn't lie about going into Iraq. If that's true, then why are you once again accusing him of doing so?

There is NO EVIDENCE THAT BUSH LIED about going into Iraq, and THAT INCLUDES OIL as a motivation.

Huh? I see no contradiction....