Why do you continue to disapoint?

[pragmatic]

According to Car and Driver it has a near 50/50 weight distribution.

I stand corrected on the weight distribution. The price is high and the fuel economy is too low for me. My ideal would be if the next generation Charger lost 200 to 300 lbs (the current v6 weights in at 4100) and Chrysler offered a 6 speed MT. The weight loss would give the V-6 enough performance for me with decent fuel economy.

 

[Telco]

I stand corrected on the weight distribution. The price is high and the fuel economy is too low for me. My ideal would be if the next generation Charger lost 200 to 300 lbs (the current v6 weights in at 4100) and Chrysler offered a 6 speed MT. The weight loss would give the V-6 enough performance for me with decent fuel economy.

I agree on the SS. I even sent GM an email that they were duplicating the failure of the GTO, and that they need to offer a bare bones as well as a midrange to make a winner out of it. Nobody is going to spend BMW money on a Chevy that gets 14MPG. I was looking forward to seeing them, until I saw what they didn't do to it. Perhaps the next version, if they keep it, will have these flaws fixed.

Ideally I'd like to see the next version of the Charger look similar to the current one because they really nailed the look, but come in at about 3700lbs. Unfortunately I have to get an auto because my wife would eventually have to be able to drive it as well. An 8 speed auto would rock.