500rwhp?

2002WRXSTi said:
Buy the looks of it I am older than most of the people here. Especially if they do not remember what a Carb is capable of.

Apparently back in your day, they didn't teach people how to spell or put together a good argument either.

FI is very narrow on what it can do but it makes things emission friendly and much more daily drivable.

Alright Mr. Wizard. Back that statement up. What is 'narrow' about fuel injection. What, precisely can a carb do that fuel injection cannot?

If I spit out names then I am no longer going to be allowed in the shop discussions period. The shop attitude is not very friendly towards anything rice.

So pretty much, you're full of sh!t. :rolleyes:

The son was DFI certified years ago

DFI certified eh? Who certified him? What platform? Please, do tell.

almost against his fathers opinion as his father has made the most HP out of a SSGTA BBC. 850HP out of a stock 454 with factory compression with a CARB!

Oh my god! 850 horesepower out of a nartually aspirated BIG BLOCK! My heart be still! :eek: :rolleyes:

FI could possibly make a few more HP and attempt to make it drivable but the class does not allow this.

Did it ever occur to you that perhaps the reason this guy prefers carbs is because he doesn't have much experience with stand-alone fuel injection?

That and the valve train cannot live on the streets.

Please tell me the difference between carbureted valvetrains and fuel injected ones. I can't wait to hear this one.

As I said a SB2 headed SBC was built and broken in with a carb then switched to DFI and came out only 4hp more @644 instead of 640hp. That is naturally aspirated HP too.

So based on this alone, you are prepared to say that fuel inection is inferior to carburetion, right?

Watching it with the carb it started and ran fine. Made the pulls did everything hands off except for setting timing. When the FI was added it is still using a mechanical pushrod style pump with no return line. That was a very interesting thing to me as when is the last time you saw a HiPo FI system with no return line?!

What's your point?

They sat tuning for a few days to try to get everything running as good as the carb does. I left by that time as it was getting boring and it was to hot in there. The main reason he wanted the FI is #1 looks #2 it would be doing a lot of low idle cruising and idling witch would make the FI the No1 pick. However the amount of money in the system plus all the tuning problems as it is not even in the vehicle yet was offset by the fact that it is a rite off cause it is advertising for his company.

So basically, this guy couldn't tune fuel injection to save his life then, right? My tune was 90% complete within one hour of leaving the house, without a dyno.

I wont even get into how a Carb does not need to know anything.

Because you have no idea what the fvck you're talking about.

They have MSD ignitions now that are programmable along with boost controllers and such.

You mean, like my AEM does right out of the box?

It's only thing to do is meter air and it does it better than FI ever will be able to.

Yes, you've mentioned this. But HOW?? Tell me how. Don't make some dipsh!t blanket statement and not back it up. Enlighten all of us.

FI's advantage is the injectors can be placed rite at the port so there will be no puddling or fuel drop out at low RPM and also can be forced to run lean for emissions reasons easily.

You do know, of course, that making a motor run lean will cause NOX to increase and make you fail emissions, right? ...and that running stoichiometric is ideal for emissions, right? Of course you did, you're the expert here.

TPI and EFI systems were better than it ever could be but none can meter air at speed like a Carb can.

This is now the third time you've mentioned this in this post alone, but you've never once backed up this claim in any way.

No mater what AEM or Motec system is out there they all use tables to make adjustments and know what timing and fuel should be doing.

A carburetor cannot make anywhere near the adjustments that a stand-alone can.

Can your precious carburetor:

Detect knock and back off timing?
Detect a too rich/lean condition in the exhaust gases and compensate?
Detect a change in engine temperature and make adjustments to timing?
Detect a change in air inlet mass and make adjustments?
Fire the first time in any weather, in any temperature?

...and the list goes on and on and on....


Even stock FI systems have to have tables to run from, they cannot just measure the amount of air being ingested

You mean with a Mass Airflow Sensor for example?

and know what to do unless they have a table to compare it to and make calculations from.

It's a good thing then that all major car manufacturers spend millions of dollars testing those tables to maximize power, fuel economy, and minimize emissions. Just incredible. What will they think of next?

A carburetor can however because the air runs through a venturi so it never has to compare to a map.

This is one of the most po-dunk, ignorant statements I've ever read on any car forum, anywhere. All hail the mighty all-knowing venturi.

It mechanically does it no matter how small the difference is, not by load cells.

HOW?? HOW HOW HOW HOW HOW HOW HOW? Please tell.

Newsflash: Electronic fuel injection makes thousands of adjustments, constantly, to adjust air and fuel to optimize against existing engine parameters. Carbs don't. It's almost as if you're suggesting that cars operate constantly in closed loop. You are really stupid.

Like I said I have FI in my cars(not AEM) and am not going to switch to a Carb but the FI does not change physics.

Apparently your carburetor defies all laws of common sense.

If you program your FI to pull timing back because you have a hi CR then you are and will lose HP.

..but a carb can magically run high compression with no additional fuel octane requirements or decreased timing? Damn, I better get me one of these.

Same with a Carb it is just easier to do most things with FI cause you can sit and change it from one point.

EFI > Carb

all it's sensors it does not allow it to change what is physically possible period.

But a carb can? :confused:

PS Dr. Nascar Carb Pro Stock Carb the FI systems are just catching up and they don't even have to be streetable :rolleyes:

Do you speaka de engrish?



Keep digging your hole moron.

Paul.
 
Dr. Paul said:
1.DFI certified eh? Who certified him? What platform? Please, do tell.

2.Oh my god! 850 horesepower out of a nartually[(naturally) sorry spelling Pro!] aspirated BIG BLOCK! My heart be still! :eek: :rolleyes:

3.Did it ever occur to you that perhaps the reason this guy prefers carbs is because he doesn't have much experience with stand-alone fuel injection?

4.So basically, this guy couldn't tune fuel injection to save his life then, right? My tune was 90% complete within one hour of leaving the house, without a dyno.

5.Because you have no idea what the fvck you're talking about.

6.You mean, like my AEM does right out of the box?

7.A carburetor cannot make anywhere near the adjustments that a stand-alone can.

8.Do you speaka de engrish?

Doctor of Proctology Paul.
I probably should have set this straight in the beginning. Father who owns shop and has world records CARBURETORS.

His son went to EFI schools and started building and tuning with 5.0 Mustand, DFI Corvette projects for customers.

1(Son)DFI systems for one in Michigan (before ACCEL bought them)and he has made more power than you ever will. We had 1000hp 5.0's before Pro 5.0 was a class :D

2(Father)Single 750cfm stock CR unported head big block. Try to ever come close on PUMP GAS!! Matter of fact his 1970 SSGTA Chevelle sold for well over 1 million on the Barret Jackson auction. Why you ask and I know you will, because it was never beaten!

3(Father)He doesn't care because there is no FI in SS classes!

4(Dr)With no clue what your engine is capable of because you have never had it dyno'd to see where you are. You are what they call a street squid because you have no standards on which to compare measurements. What race class have you won? Or is it just as long as it can make it to McDonald's and back?

5(Me)BAHAHAHA like you F'n do :confused:

6. Yeah like all the people that have won races have...oh no the had them professionally tuned...hmmmm I thought it did everything perfect all by itself :p

7.Yes it can because it does one thing and one thing only. Measures the exact amount of fuel to the air that is passing by the jet. WHY?? Cause you have no idea how a Carb works and that is saddest thing of all :eek:

8.Nascar uses wait for it....CARBURETORS! Pro Stock uses....CARBURETORS! Do you read the English or did you let an ECU teach you all you know :shifty:

This shop is over 30 years old and is #2 SS Builder in the world. Still has NHRA records that stand to this day. Auto manufacturers have come to the owner to design cam profiles for them and his biggest invention that even you will know what it is. He invented the Crank Trigger and sold it to MSD who supplies it to the auto world and I am now bored explaining things to someone who cant even grasp what a Carburetors function is :rolleyes:

Now go make a 11:1 CR engine let your ECU self tune it and watch the world beat a path to your door....hehehe

PS...make sure you wash your Proctology finger first cause your doing a :q:q:q:qty job on your enigine already Dr.
 
Frogman said:
Crankshaft Trigger Patent

Inventors: Peck; Gordon H. (Las Cruces, NM)
Autotronic Controls Corporation?
This is what he invented. The Flying Magnet system that can be added to any engine.
pn8600.gif
 
2002WRXSTi said:
I probably should have set this straight in the beginning. Father who owns shop and has world records CARBURETORS.

...and you still haven't answered who this is.

His son went to EFI schools and started building and tuning with 5.0 Mustand, DFI Corvette projects for customers. 1(Son)DFI systems for one in Michigan (before ACCEL bought them)and he has made more power than you ever will. We had 1000hp 5.0's before Pro 5.0 was a class :D

This doesn't answer any questions above.


2(Father)Single 750cfm stock CR unported head big block. Try to ever come close on PUMP GAS!! Matter of fact his 1970 SSGTA Chevelle sold for well over 1 million on the Barret Jackson auction. Why you ask and I know you will, because it was never beaten!

You obviously don't ever do much reading of how much power the Engine Master's challenge motors put down, or the Pump Gas wars, or anything like that, do you?

3(Father)He doesn't care because there is no FI in SS classes!

So basically, you're confirming that he doesn't have any real experience with electronic fuel injection.

4(Dr)With no clue what your engine is capable of because you have never had it dyno'd to see where you are. You are what they call a street squid because you have no standards on which to compare measurements. What race class have you won? Or is it just as long as it can make it to McDonald's and back?

Bwaaaaaaaaaaahahahaha. You think I've never dynoed my car? What a fvcking tool. With my AEM, you only have to spend about two hours or so on the dyno tuning the WOT pulls, which is the easiest part of it. The rest is done on the street with a litttle data logging, 3D mapping of the curves, and simple adjustments to timing and fuel based off what my AFR gauge is telling me.

5(Me)BAHAHAHA like you F'n do :confused:

I've backed my arguments, unlike you.

6. Yeah like all the people that have won races have...oh no the had them professionally tuned...hmmmm I thought it did everything perfect all by itself :p

I guess the guy who tunes my car, and has tuned plenty of 8 and 9 second turbo/blown applications must not know what he's doing. :rolleyes:

7.Yes it can because it does one thing and one thing only. Measures the exact amount of fuel to the air that is passing by the jet. WHY?? Cause you have no idea how a Carb works and that is saddest thing of all :eek:

YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED THE QUESTION.

Here, I'll re-state them for you so your simple mind can take this all in:

It's only thing to do is meter air and it does it better than FI ever will be able to.

How exactly? C'mon Mr. Wizard, you're the genius here. Tell me how it meters air better than EFI. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY IDEA.

8.Nascar uses wait for it....CARBURETORS! Pro Stock uses....CARBURETORS! Do you read the English or did you let an ECU teach you all you know :shifty:

WRC uses FI. F1 uses FI. IRL uses FI. CART uses FI. GT uses FI. LeMans uses FI. All modern cars use FI. What's your point?



You've still not answered hardly any of the questions above.

I still want to know from you:

1. Why FI is "very narrow" in what it can do.
2. Why FI valvetrains are different that carbureted valvetrains.
3. How a carburetor can measure airflow more precisely than FI.
4. How running a car lean with FI is somehow better for emissions.
5. How a venturi can precisely meter air, but a Mass Air Sensor can't.
6. How you can run high compression in a carbed motor with no additional fuel octane requirements, but it doesn't work in a FI motor.


Please smart guy. Answer these questions. You don't have a clue what you're talking about. People who talk about fast cars they don't own, usually don't have one, and usually are full of sh!t.


Paul.
 
Or should I say created? Either way he sold the design to MSD and almost everyone in the upper SS classes uses it.
 
You said he invented the crank trigger, which was invented by Gordon Peck (above) - but then you said it was his Chevelle that sold at Barrett Jackson for $1.15M.

There's a little problem with that - the owner of that Chevelle was Ray Allen, not Gordon Peck.

Wanna try again?

Paul.
 
Dr. Paul said:
1. Why FI is "very narrow" in what it can do.
2. Why FI valvetrains are different that carbureted valvetrains.
3. How a carburetor can measure airflow more precisely than FI.
4. How running a car lean with FI is somehow better for emissions.
5. How a venturi can precisely meter air, but a Mass Air Sensor can't.
6. How you can run high compression in a carbed motor with no additional fuel octane requirements, but it doesn't work in a FI motor.


Dr Anus.
1.Put a carb on a SC and it will run, put SC on a NA FI engine and it will fall on it's face
2.You said that not me cause the valve train will not survive either way
3.If you cannot see how I cannot even begin to explain it to you.
4.4-6-8...ok it ain't lean it is a lack of any combustion
5.A mass air sensor can only have so many maps. A venturi works on physical actions= infinite
6.I never said that, you said that you could run high compression and lots of boost because you have FI.
 
Dr. Paul said:
You said he invented the crank trigger, which was invented by Gordon Peck (above) - but then you said it was his Chevelle that sold at Barrett Jackson for $1.15M.

There's a little problem with that - the owner of that Chevelle was Ray Allen, not Gordon Peck.

Wanna try again?

Paul.
Ray Allen owned the car after it was sold to him. He was the driver and when the cars career was over he purchased it.

Also he invented the flying magnet style sold by MSD.

But your getting close. I don't think the car is lettered or is it? Hint hint...
 
2002WRXSTi said:
1.Put a carb on a SC and it will run, put SC on a NA FI engine and it will fall on it's face
2.You said that not me cause the valve train will not survive either way
3.If you cannot see how I cannot even begin to explain it to you.
4.4-6-8...ok it ain't lean it is a lack of any combustion
5.A mass air sensor can only have so many maps. A venturi works on physical actions= infinite
6.I never said that, you said that you could run high compression and lots of boost because you have FI.
25201324345.jpg


Oh master of engines if your mighty carburator is great how come cars today run cleaner, more efficient, and produce way more power than carbuerated cars of yesteryear.
 
out boost into an NA engine and it will fall on its face?


better not tell that to the 3000gt guys who are putting turbos on their FWDs.


granted bolting the turbos on and driving isnt the best. (too small injectors, 220cc/min, too much ign timing) but it does run and at low boost runs fkn strong.
 
I give up anyway. I screwed up cause the car is a SS/EA not a SS/GTA.

Anyway I cannot explain to the extent that the builder can. I was told don't even try to bring this stuff up with street racers because they will never understand as they have no class rules to follow and then never fully see the extent of what can be done.

This all started when I said you could not run any more CR with boost with a FI engine than a Carb engine. None of you know or ever need to so who cares at this point.

I did find this while looking around however.
HPIM0412%20(Custom).JPG

Michael Fratena
"Michael has had a chance to dial in the Camaros true potential. The Camaro qualified Second with a 9.663/141.15 effort and got all the way to the semi where he met eventual winner Mike Dezotell. "We were still working on it when it went in the trailer to come here." Michael says. Wait till they get the Bow Tie all sorted out. Thats when you'll hear the nitrous and supercharger guys start complaining."

I am thinking wow a Carbureted turbo car that is not even tuned came in second to all the FI cars...hmmmmm
 
2002WRXSTi said:
I am thinking wow a Carbureted turbo car that is not even tuned came in second to all the FI cars...hmmmmm

WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
 
2002WRXSTi said:
1.Put a carb on a SC and it will run, put SC on a NA FI engine and it will fall on it's face
2.You said that not me cause the valve train will not survive either way
3.If you cannot see how I cannot even begin to explain it to you.
4.4-6-8...ok it ain't lean it is a lack of any combustion
5.A mass air sensor can only have so many maps. A venturi works on physical actions= infinite
6.I never said that, you said that you could run high compression and lots of boost because you have FI.

1. Please back up this (obviously false) claim with evidence.
2. I'm just re-iterating what is coming out of your retarded pie hole.
3. Precisely, you have no idea WTF you're talking about.
4. So now fuel injected cars don't have any combustion? Wow, how is that?
5. MAF sensors don't have maps you fxcktard. Do you even understand how one works?
6. You can run high (relatively) compression and lots of boost, as long as you have the appropriate fuel, and a good tune.


Keep it coming retard. Enlighten us with your magic carburetor knowledge.

Oh, and I expect good, well-thought-out replies with evidence in response to your claims that:

1. Blown FI motors fall on their face, while blown carbureted ones don't.
2. How a carb can meter air better than fuel injection.
3. How a MAF sensor has 'maps' in it.
4. How FI combustion engines have a 'lack of combustion'.


Please, we all need to partake in your automotive wizardry.

Paul.
 
Dr. Paul said:
Keep it coming retard. Enlighten us with your magic carburetor knowledge.
Please, we all need to partake in your automotive wizardry.

Paul.

Yeah really where the :q:q:q:q is my 100mpg carb that detroit keeps a secret. Must be like this super secret carb that is better than ECM cars.
 
2002WRXSTi said:
It says right in his list it has a 3 mm head gasket for starters. A thicker headgasket has nothing to do with compression though right? Then on to AEM, DSS axles and drivetrain...yeah they came stock with all that stuff. They just threw on a turbo and put boost to a stock drivetrain :shifty:

Who said it was a stock drivetrain? I certainly didn't. I said it was a stock engine.

The engine is is now far from stock. Yeah they did an impressive job on the S2k but the compression is not stock with a 3mm gasket.

Oh, and what is the compression then?


I have seen it plenty of times in SS pulling.
"The most extreme example is a three stage turbo diesel tractor pulling engine. The first stage actually uses twin parallel turbos to provide the required airflow. Twin parallel turbos don't provide more pressure, just more airflow. The outlet from the twin parallel turbos (low pressure turbos) feeds an intercooler and is then sent to a single intermediate pressure turbo. The intermediate pressure turbo increases the pressure further, and sends the flow to another intercooler, which then sends the flow to a high pressure turbocharger, which will be smaller in size. The high pressure turbocharger feeds an aftercooler, which then feeds the engine with up to 250 psi of boost pressure. No gasoline engine could withstand this level of boost. With this much boost, a Diesel tractor pulling engine can produce something like 5,000 horsepower from a basically stock tractor block."
The CR is dropped with custom pistons as there is no need for cold starting reliability. They have gone as low at 8:1 CR and must be started with Either if conditions are not correct. At the boost pressures they run there is no mechanical advantage to higher compression ratios.

404 Error - Part where it is explained that compression must be lowered not found.





I found this while I was looking for the diesel turbo answer.

"Reduced Static Compression- Due to the compression of the turbo, engine compression ratio must be reduced to bring the overall compression ratio to a safe range, which will reduce charge temperatures in the cylinder. A typical compression ratio in a high performance turbo street engine is around 9:1. Non turbo engines can go as high as 11.5:1 on the street."

How are you altering this with engine managment? I have been asking this and all you come back with is prove me wrong. Were are your records and wins? Turbotrix has the record for a 4G63 engine and the shop I worked at doing SC installs still has a NHRA record that stands to this day in SS done in 1970!

Where in what you quoted does it say that high compression cannot be used in a boosted engine?

Also here are a few diesel engine CR's form the manufactures because they have found that boost negates the need for higher CR's.
1982-93 GM NA 6.2L V8-Compression Ratio: 21.3
2001-up GM/Isuzu DI Turbo Duramax V8-Compression Ratio: 17.5:1
1983-88 Ford 6.9L and 1988-92 7.3L NA V8-Compression Ratio: 21.5:1
1994-98 Ford Powerstroke DI Turbo V8-Compression Ratio: 17.5:1

The manufacturers have found like racing engine builders that the amount of effort wasted on higher CR's can be better used with boost to fill the cylinder and alter the efficiency in a better way. Hence my quote as a high CR is a Handicap at this point! Not for a NA car but on a boosted car.

I'm still not seeing anything here that backs up your claims. The compression was reduced because the newer engines can start easier. Check the model years on the higher compression diesels.
 
Where did Mr. Super-genius disappear to? I'm still anxiously waiting to partake in his boundless automotive knowledge.
 
Something needs to be done about Dr. Paul insulting everyone. I have him on my ignore list but I still see his insults when other people quote him. Why is his behaviour allowed to continue?
 
67Continental said:
Something needs to be done about Dr. Paul insulting everyone. I have him on my ignore list but I still see his insults when other people quote him. Why is his behaviour allowed to continue?

You're kidding, right? Have you seen what bullsh!t is coming out of this guy's mouth?

Wow.
 
Dr. Paul gets a gold star from me. His technical knowledge is just incredible.

I don't see any insults here. All I see coming from him is cold hard fact.

Any person claiming that a carburetor is a more accurate form of air/fuel delivery than a digital programmable efi system has insulted themselves.
 
Dominus said:
I don't see any insults here. All I see coming from him is cold hard fact.

Dr. Paul said:
Where did Mr. Super-genius disappear to? I'm still anxiously waiting to partake in his boundless automotive knowledge.

That would probably qualify as an insult. He still seems like a good guy.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top