I hope not. I HATE flappy paddle shifters! Give me a clutch pedal and a real shifter please!
Some people are SO stuck in performance history...
I have always prefered a manual over an automatic until I started driving manumatic transmissions.
Todays paddle shifter manumatics (the technical term for such a transmission, BTW), are far superior to a manual, it's not even funny. How is this possible?
Let's analyze this:
1. Millisecond shift times. Can you shift gears in ~30ms on a manual?
2. Manumatic equipped powertrain controls automatically select the correct gear when you downshift. Personally, I'd go with what the manufacturer's powertrain engineers spent thousands of man-hours testing and playing to find the lower gear that gives you the most power at a certain speed.
3. The capability for perfect Rev-matching when you downshift. Imagine downshifting and the engine computer automatically blipping the throttle to make sure the engine RPM matches the selected downshift. No more bogging because you were 200RPM lower than what the selected gear needs and no more lunging forward because you were 200 RPM over the target RPM for the lower gear you select.
I mean, seriously, what good is a manual tranny for in a car, nowadays? Slipping the clutch so you can launch? Oh.. wait.. most cars with manumatics have the function built in.
Hell, even the likes of Lamborghini and F1 are going to all manumatics.
As far as putting an Allison 6-speed in a Mark... good luck with that.
Now, Gear Vendors would be a decent option for gaining gears on the stock Mark 4 speed tranny, had they not turned into a typical company that now sells junk.
If I ever go with a 5.9 Cummins in my F-450 I will go with a 9 speed manual, but I'm not going to be crazy about it. I would go with an automatic but I can't think of one automatic transmission that can fit under a medium-duty pick-up truck that can take 2,000+ ft lbs of torque on a daily basis.