Dear Leftists...So Obama is not a Kenyan Huh?

Fascism is based on corporatism.
No, fascism is based on totalitarianism.

Beyond that, there isn't much of an agreed upon definition of what it specifically is. In modern time, used by communists and progressives, it's just used as a word to distance themselves from identified evil and dismiss things as "bad."

Hitler was part of the Nationalist Socialist Party. It's ideas and ideology was virtually the same as Communism. Infact, most of the brown shirts were communist before they joined. The biggest difference was that Communism is more closely identified with CLASS and international in view while "fascism" (as you present it) is more nationalistic.

That's about it.

This myth that "fascism" has anything to do with the American "right" is insulting and just a disgusting lie. When did Hitler ever support limited government and personal liberty?

He didn't.

Now we can spend hours debating and discussing all the various names people like you use to hide your statist, totalitarian ideologies, the distinctions you make up, the words you redefine, but it's pointless.

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power”
So if a government manages the banks, takes over student loans, owns over 90% of all home loans, owns 2 of the big 3 auto makers, takes over healthcare...according to your definition, what is that government?

By the man who should know… Benito Mussolini.

When Mousonli was shot by the communists, what did Bombacci, Mussolini's journalist friend (and mutual friend of Lenin) yell?

"Long live Mussolini! Long live Socialism!"


"Everything in the State, nothing outside the Sate, nothing against the State."

Does that sound like Madison or Marx to you?

Because those are Mussolini's famous words.


Perpetuate your lie elsewhere, foxpaws.
You're not going to get a free pass here.

As I said, the efforts of you and your fellow travelers aren't working any more.
The intimidation and name calling is no longer effective. The mockery and demonization is failing.
So then what will you?

I'll restate it....
According to the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'

Since it's a World Net Daily link, so I provided the actual source with it.

Is that a "crazy" conspiracy theory, foxpaws?
Is that putting "crazy microbes" in the water?
Is that paper not real? Are those opinions not those of Sunstein?
 
This myth that "fascism" has anything to do with the American "right" is insulting and just a disgusting lie. When did Hitler ever support limited government and personal liberty?

He didn't.

Now we can spend hours debating and discussing all the various names people like you use to hide your statist, totalitarian ideologies, the distinctions you make up, the words you redefine, but it's pointless.

Oh, lets spend hours, because it is soooo important to you to label everything, especially me. Between you and Shag and Foss who now just lurks... I have a label that is probably longer than my arm...

I never, ever stated that Fascism is right - in fact, more than once I have acknowledged it is left - always has been, always will be. Don't try to backhand lie about that Cal.

So if a government manages the banks, owns manufacturing, takes over healthcare...according to your definition, what is that?

Hasn't taken over health care - manages banks only in the interium while they are paying back taxpayer money (sort of having my representative on the board, because they have my money). And will be out of the automotive business before you know it....

Short term solutions - not long term policy.

As I said - Obama could have nationalized the banks - it was right there. He didn't.
When Mousonli was shot by communists, what did Bombacci yell?

"Long live Mussolini! Long live Socialism!"

And Bombacci was an idiot - what does that prove. That he was a Leninist and not a Marxist... I think you really need to get out your Socialism primer here Cal.
 
Oh, lets spend hours, because it is soooo important to you to label everything, especially me.
Was that an effort to change the topic or play the victim card? Maybe it was an effort at both. It certainly wasn't a response to the point I was making.

I never, ever stated that Fascism is right - in fact, more than once I have acknowledged it is left - always has been, always will be. Don't try to backhand lie about that Cal.

You just said that fascism is incompatible with socialism and Marxism. That they don't "play well together" and I just demonstrated that Mussolini, AND HITLER, we both socialists that you would define as fascists.

Now that you've suddenly always recognized that fascism is system that is LEFT by nature, are you willing to recognize that Hitler was a radical left-winger too?

Hasn't taken over health care - manages banks only in the interium while they are paying back taxpayer money (sort of having my representative on the board, because they have my money). And will be out of the automotive business before you know it....
So a moment ago you were denying this- now you're excusing it.....

And Bombacci was an idiot - what does that prove.
It reinforces the fact that Mussolini was a socialist.
And that socialism and fascism are very compatible, a fact that you have attempted to deny, excuse, and then ignore- depending on what challenge you're confronted with.

It also demonstrates, yet again, that you're not interested in honest discussion or exchange of ideas... you're a political hack, a propagandist of the lowest esteem.
 
Mussolini was a socialist because some idiot screamed it out before he himself was hung? OK - CAL IS A FASCIST (note I screamed that... so it must be true).

And there is no way you showed that Hitler and Mussolini were socialists... lets really look at this Cal...

Socialism (ala Marx) and Fascism aren't compatible... just look how they treat private property... Fascism - tons of wealth in private hands, true marxist socialism - total equality.

Hitler wasn't a socialist - Marx saw industrialized workers rising up to take over control of their means of production - do you think Hitler envisioned that?

Are you confusing Leninism, Stalinism, Soviet style communism with socialism?

Socialism is compatible with democracy - fascism isn't. It only works in a single party system, or dictatorship.

There is no way Hitler was a socialist... Do you think he was going to allow state ownership be given over to worker ownership - are you nuts?

Some define socialism as public or state ownership - is that what you are going for Cal? Not the traditional direct worker ownership?

Plus, fascism is all about nationalism, Marxism is all about internationalism...

They aren't similar... except at one juncture - at some point socialism probably needs to go through what is known as state capitalism, where the state controls all business or business controls all of the state - fascism stops there, never going to the next step that Marx does - to worker ownership.

Fascism controls money and sets prices, socialism - doesn't even have money.

Mussolini knew the difference...
The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill.

Fascism - the state controls the worker - in socialism - the state doesn't control the worker - the worker controls the state, if there even is one.
 
Well, someone sent me this little list...

There is a reason they have different words for this stuff Cal...

Earmarks of Nazism, none of these are in socialism...

Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Supremacy of the Military
Rampant Sexism
Controlled Mass Media
Obsession with National Security
Religion and Government are Intertwined
Corporate Power is Protected
Labor Power is Suppressed
Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fraudulent Elections, or no elections.

As far removed from egalitarianism as you can get... Far removed from a welfare state. The poor, the infirm, the sick, the helpless, Nazis either drafted them, sterilized them, or gassed them.

All unions outlawed - the labor class became a second class -

Speaking of class... Huge class system - going as far as to create an uber race... Ayran.

As far as economics - it was only a means to and end, that end being the societal dominance of the Nazis - military, political, cutural.

There is no way Hitler was a socialist... Heck, he was a pretty poor fascist - He was a Nazi...

Fascism - Mussolini - has been far left forever, same as Stalin - Hitler on the other hand - was insane - but his Nazi policies put him far, far, right.
 
Fascism is based on corporatism

Corporatism is part of fascism (and Nazism) but it isn't its root. Fascism is socialism mixed with an populist sentiment. Nazism is socialism mixed with a Nationalist sentiment.

The ideal of Marxist worker based socialism is sort of on the opposite scale of business/government collusion based corporatism which Mussolini relied on.

That is why it is called, right wing socialism; on an ideological spectrum of socialism, fascism would be on the right.

However, it's core is still socialism; social justice through collectivist means. Simply because they make pragmatic concessions toward economic efficiency in the means of collectivism does not change that fact.

I don’t see a lot of Marxist based socialism in the history books when I look at Nazi Germany or Fascist Italy

You don't see socialism in National Socialism (Nazism)? Or in an approach founded by one of Italy's socialist heroes, Mussolini?

It is not orthodox Marxism (which is why many orthodox Marxist's labeled Fascism and Nazism as a heresy of Marxism) but it is still socialism.

Not a lot of worker revolt

You mean like in the U.S.S.R.? Oh wait, that was a top-down revolt too. :rolleyes:

Not a lot of socialistic thought

Prior to WWII, both Italian and German politics had been dominated by socialism for decades. What Mussolini and Hitler both did was promise a new type of socialism that fed off of popular sentiment at the time (populism in Italy and Nationalism in Germany). To say there was not a lot of "socialistic thought" is to be either ignorant of history of willfully dishonest. Both would be in character for you.

I could go with worker/government economic system as socialist - pretty easily.

You are again trying to misrepresent socialism as an economic system. I have said it before, it is FIRST a theory of social causation. From that the ideology is derived and from the ideology the economic approach is derived.

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power”

That doesn't in any way negate the fact that Fascism is socialism.

Unless you can show that Fascism (and/or National Socialism) is not aimed at achieving social justice through collectivist means, your argument is nothing but misdirection and deception.

Maybe you should be the one Cal to sort of bone up on your history

No, that would be you. However, if you have no intellectual integrity to begin with, then you are wasting your time.

Continue on - marginalize yourself all you want.

That, again, would be you. You are the only one intentionally lying and misleading.

Continue to LIE about National Socialism (Nazism) and Facism all you want. There are plenty on this forum who know a lot more then you on these things and will gladly point out your lies.

Marginalize yourself all you want.
 
Mussolini was a socialist because some idiot screamed it out before he himself was hung? OK - CAL IS A FASCIST (note I screamed that... so it must be true).

No, Mussolini was named after socialist heroes at the time of his birth.

His bedtime stories were Das Capital and other Marxist/socialist writings.

He worked for socialist publications and grew to be a hero of Italian socialists.

He only broke with the socialists over their handling of WWI.

Socialism (ala Marx) and Fascism aren't compatible... just look how they treat private property... Fascism - tons of wealth in private hands, true marxist socialism - total equality.

Again, focusing on the economics of it is a blatant attempt to mislead.

But if you want to do that, read this article first.
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.

What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Hitler wasn't a socialist

No, he was a National Socialist. Know your history and stop spreading lies.

Marx saw industrialized workers rising up to take over control of their means of production

And yet socialist revolutions have typically been top-down.

Are you confusing Leninism, Stalinism, Soviet style communism with socialism?

No, you are simply choosing to ignore the obvious and logical connections.

Again, no integrity of which to speak.

Socialism is compatible with democracy - fascism isn't

Not exactly. Collectivism is incompatible with the rule of law and all forms of socialism (including fascism and National Socialism) necessitate collectivism.

Some define socialism as public or state ownership

Correction; some inaccurately define socialism as public or state ownership while missing the bigger picture. Economics is not the heart of socialism.

fascism is all about nationalism

No, Fascism is socialism mixed with a populist sentiment.

National Socialism (Nazism) is socialism mixed with a Nationalist sentiment.

They aren't similar... except at one juncture - at some point socialism probably needs to go through what is known as state capitalism, where the state controls all business or business controls all of the state - fascism stops there, never going to the next step that Marx does - to worker ownership.

So, fascist states stop at a point were, "he state controls all business or business controls all of the state". I thought you said fascism left ownership private.

Mussolini knew the difference...
The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporation conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill.

Again, none of that is at all inconsistent with what I said.

Fascism and National Socialism were a new type of socialism in their respective states that played off of sentiments popular in those states and made pragmatic political and policy concessions from Orthodox Marxism to correct much of the theory that had proven flawed in the real world.

Both were a more "pragmatic" socialism. To attempt to compare them to Orthodox Marxist theory is to mislead. This is evident in the fact that many of the distinctions you draw to differentiate from Marxism also apply to the U.S.S.R. and most other socialist states who had to make pragmatic concessions as well.
 
Well, someone sent me this little list...
Your propaganda is getting weak, you had to get outside help.

There is a reason they have different words for this stuff Cal...
There are differences in all of these things, many are subtle, many reflect the nations and cultures in which the governments are applied. But the core values have common foundations.

Earmarks of Fascism, none of these are in socialism...
Again, you're making the critical mistake of implying that there is a uniform definition of what "fascism" is. If you get a dozen books, you'll find a dozen different definitions.

Some will say Mussolini wasn't even a real fascist.
Some will say Hitler was, or wasn't. And other will also include Lenin and Mao.

The point is, they all have their roots in Marx.
They all embrace socialist policies.
And they all are totalitarian.

Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
I would argue that the biggest difference between fascist, as it is commonly understood and communism is the nationalist versus internationalist identity. I said so much in a prior post.

Communist identifying with CLASS internationally. Nationalists identifying with identity and trying to eliminate class distinctions within the borders..

Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Because Stalin respected human rights?
Because Mao respected human rights?
Because Hitler respected human rights?

No, what you have in fascism, as you have with Marxism/Socialism/Communism as it is applied in the real world, is the sacrifice of the individual for the collective.

Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Again, differentiate that from Hitler identifying the Jews as the scapegoat or unifying cause. Or the restoration of the German empire.

Or the millions murder by Stalin after being blamed for his murderous economic policies?

Or what about in this country where we are blaiming Tea Parties and Bankers?

Supremacy of the Military
Again, sounds like the communists to me.
Also sounds like Wilson (WWI) FDR (WW2) and even Kennedy (Vietnam escalation and the, arguably, the moon launch.)

Rampant Sexism
"Rampant sexism" isn't defining element of any fascism.
In fact, that's a stupid statement. Is the implication that a woman is incapable of leading or being involved in a fascistic government?

There was a fascist movement in Britain that had very vocal and high profile woman associated and leading it.

So this point is just ignorant.

Controlled Mass Media
And Hitler, Stalin, Wilson, and FDR all did this.

You're providing me a lot of examples that are really totalitarian, but they don't exclude Marixism based philosophies.

Obsession with National Security
what country isn't.
Unless you mean to say that the Soviet Union was no interested in "national security."

Religion and Government are Intertwined
Replace the capital "G" of government for the lower case "g" of government.

Again, consistent with all of the Marx based theories.

Corporate Power is Protected
No, this isn't true.
If a corporate structure is left in place, it's controlled by the state.

But, for expediency, I'm just going to quote wikipedia:

Mussolini pushed for government control of business: by 1935, Mussolini claimed that three quarters of Italian businesses were under state control. That same year, he issued several edicts to further control the economy, including forcing all banks, businesses, and private citizens to give up all their foreign-issued stocks and bonds to the Bank of Italy. In 1938, he also instituted wage and price controls. He also attempted to turn Italy into a self-sufficient autarky, instituting high barriers on trade with most countries except Germany.

In 1943 he proposed the theory of economic socialization.

Labor Power is Suppressed
Not true- as I've repeatedly explained.

Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Not true.
Fascist art was abundant.
Futurism and technology were embraced by Mussolini.
Mussolini used the image of the air plane prominently to enhance his image.



Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Allegiance and obedience to the state.
But that's consistent with communism and any kind of totalitarianism.

Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Again, power corrupts.
Not a unique feature to fascism.
And also associated with the other marxist derived philosophies like socialism and communism when applied.

Fraudulent Elections, or no elections.
You mean like in Venezuela?
Is Chavez a fascist or does he embraces Marxist ideals?

So, to conclude this-
You've failed to distinguish ANYTHING, with the possible exception of the nationalist/internationalist angle, that distinguishes or makes fascism and the Marxist philosophies incompatible. In fact, you've DEMONSTRATED how fascism is USED by the left to establish and enforce such philosophies.

Now if you want to talk Nazism... which is far right...
Nazism is short for NATIONAL SOCIALISM.
So there is NO relation to the American right in the classically liberal tradition. If you attempt to argue otherwise, you are engaged in a lie.

As far removed from egalitarianism as you can get... Far removed from a welfare state. The poor, the infirm, the sick, the helpless, Nazis either drafted them, sterilized them, or gassed them.

And so did the 20th century progressives in the United States. People you have expressed your respect and favor for in the past. So did people like Woodrow Wilson and Walter Lipman.
And so did the Soviets.
So eugenics is not a American "right" principle, that one is firmly with your travelers on the left.

Hitler was hugely influenced by a lecture by Feder called "How and by What Means Is capitalism to be Eliminated."

The fact is that the Nazi's fought with the COMMUNISTS for the territory on the LEFT of the spectrum. It relied on left wing and communist imagery and and rhetoric in it's effort to appeal to communist. Even the red background on the nazi flag was designed to appeal to communist.

As mentioned repeatedly, the Nazis were very similar to the communists, except they focused on nationalism and not class. They identified themselves by their nationality first, and then sought to eliminate the classes, where the internationlist leanings of the communists sought to link all people of a similar class together, dissolving borders- "workers of the world unite."

All unions outlawed - the labor class became a second class -
Unions were replaced by government controlled trade unions-
And the class distinctions you speak of are the result of political corruption, not design.

Just like the the Soviet countries, where everyone is equal, just some more than others.

Again, none of this is resembles "classical liberalism."

Speaking of class... Huge class system - going as far as to create an uber race... Ayran.
And that's "right" wing.
Hitler echoing Jefferson?

As far as economics - it was only a means to and end, that end being the cultural, military and political dominance of the Nazi party, the German people and the Aryan race - all of which are rather rightist ideas.
You keep saying it's rightist, but then you never explain how it resembles anything associated with the American right, or classical liberalism.

Is this just a talking point or have you been brainwashed?

Fascism - Mussolini - has been far left forever, same as Stalin - Hitler on the other hand - was insane - but his Nazi policies put him far, far, right.
First, let me state agreement-
Mussolini was far left, and, despite your claims, his fascism is absolutely consistent and applicable with marxist theory, including socialism.

And I agree that there is a difference regarding the fascist tendency towards nationalism.

But Hitler and his NATIONAL SOCIALIST party were also staking out territory on what WE would consider the far, far left of the political spectrum. And to perpetuate that lie advanced by the radical left and communists to distinguish themselves from the evil that we identify with Hitlerism is a lie.

But to conclude this point, why don't we just look at the platform of Hitler's National Socialist (NAZI) party. And then after reading that, other than some of the nationalism, let me know if you think it resembles the American "right".


The Program of the National-Socialist (Nazi)
German Workers’ Party
(1933)

The Program of the German Workers’ Party is a program for our time. The leadership rejects the establishment of new aims after those set out in the Program have been achieved, for the sole purpose of making it possible for the Party to continue to exist as the result of the artificially stimulated dissatisfaction of the masses.

1. We demand the uniting of all Germans within one Greater Germany, on the basis of the right to self-determination of nations.

2. We demand equal rights for the German people (Volk) with respect to other nations, and the annulment of the peace treaty of Versailles and St. Germain.

3. We demand land and soil (Colonies) to feed our People and settle our excess population.

4. Only Nationals (Volksgenossen) can be Citizens of the State. Only persons of German blood can be Nationals, regardless of religious affiliation. No Jew can therefore be a German National.

5. Any person who is not a Citizen will be able to live in Germany only as a guest and must be subject to legislation for Aliens.

6. Only a Citizen is entitled to decide the leadership and laws of the State. We therefore demand that only Citizens may hold public office, regardless of whether it is a national, state or local office.

We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of making party considerations, and not character and ability, the criterion for appointments to official positions.

7. We demand that the State make it its duty to provide opportunities of employment first of all for its own Citizens. If it is not possible to maintain the entire population of the State, then foreign nationals (non-Citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans is to be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany after August 2, 1914, be forced to leave the Reich without delay.

9. All German Citizens must have equal rights and duties.

10. It must be the first duty of every Citizen to carry out intellectual or physical work. Individual activity must not be harmful to the public interest and must be pursued within the framework of the community and for the general good.

We therefore demand:

11. The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort.

Breaking the Servitude of Interest.

12. In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against the nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all enterprises (already) converted into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large enterprises.

15. We demand the large-scale development of old-age pension schemes.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle class; the immediate communalization of the large department stores, which are to be leased at low rates to small tradesmen. We demand the most careful consideration for the owners of small businesses in orders placed by national, state, or community authorities.

17. We demand land reform in accordance with our national needs and a law for expropriation without compensation of land for public purposes. Abolition of ground rent and prevention of all speculation in land.

18. We demand ruthless battle against those who harm the common good by their activities. Persons committing base crimes against the People, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished by death without regard to religion or race.

19. We demand the replacement of Roman Law, which serves a materialistic World Order, by German Law.

20. In order to make higher education – and thereby entry into leading positions – available to every able and industrious German, the State must provide a thorough restructuring of our entire public educational system. The courses of study at all educational institutions are to be adjusted to meet the requirements of practical life. Understanding of the concept of the State must be achieved through the schools (teaching of civics) at the earliest age at which it can be grasped. We demand the education at the public expense of specially gifted children of poor parents, without regard to the latters’ position or occupation.

21. The State must raise the level of national health by means of mother-and-child care, the banning of juvenile labor, achievements of physical fitness through legislation for compulsory gymnastics and sports, and maximum support for all organizations providing physical training for young people.

22. We demand the abolition of hireling troops and the creation of a national army.

23. We demand laws to fight against deliberate political lies and their dissemination by the press. In order to make it possible to create a German press, we demand:

a) all editors and editorial employees of newspapers appearing in the German language must be German by race;

b) non-German newspapers require express permission from the State for their publication. They may not be printed in the German language;

c) any financial participation in a German newspaper or influence on such a paper is to be forbidden by law to non-Germans and the penalty for any breach of this law will be the closing of the newspaper in question, as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-Germans involved.

Newspapers which violate the public interest are to be banned. We demand laws against trends in art and literature which have a destructive effect on our national life, and the suppression of performances that offend against the above requirements.

24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations, provided that they do not endanger the existence of the State or offend the concepts of decency and morality of the Germanic race.

The Party as such stands for positive Christianity, without associating itself with any particular denomination. It fights against the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a permanent revival of our nation can be achieved only from within, on the basis of:

Public Interest before Private Interest.

25. To carry out all the above we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the Reich. Unquestioned authority by the political central Parliament over the entire Reich and over its organizations in general. The establishment of trade and professional organizations to enforce the Reich basic laws in the individual states.

The Party leadership promises to take an uncompromising stand, at the cost of their own lives if need be, on the enforcement of the above points.

Munich, February 24, 1920.

Das Programm der NSDAP
("The Program of the National-Socialist German Workers’ Party"), Berlin [1933].

All of these "isms" reflect the countries and cultures in which they are applied. Marxism in Germany looked like National Socialism, Nazism. It became Fascism when adopted by the Italians. And when it was shaped by the American conscious, it manifest itself here as Progressivism. But the foundations are all very similar.

And none of the them resemble the American right today.
 
Well, someone sent me this little list...

There is a reason they have different words for this stuff Cal...

Earmarks of Nazism, none of these are in socialism...

Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Supremacy of the Military
Rampant Sexism
Controlled Mass Media
Obsession with National Security
Religion and Government are Intertwined
Corporate Power is Protected
Labor Power is Suppressed
Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fraudulent Elections, or no elections.

That is nothing but rhetoric. It is not at all tied to actual philosophical worldviews. Instead it simply focuses on the "trappings"of National Socialism; and in doing so, a lot of it's claims are still questionable at best.

If your cherry picked "facts" are now nothing more then hearsay, you have no argument.
 
Corporatism is part of fascism (and Nazism) but it isn't its root. Fascism is socialism mixed with an populist sentiment. Nazism is socialism mixed with a Nationalist sentiment.

That is why it is called, right wing socialism; on an ideological spectrum of socialism, fascism would be on the right.

So you see socialism as just an economic system Shag? Because certainly the core of Fascism is class - not equality. And 'social justice'? Hard to have social justice, even with your academic standard when you have a class system.

You don't see socialism in National Socialism (Nazism)? Or in an approach founded by one of Italy's socialist heroes Mussolini)?

It is not orthodox Marxism (which is why many orthodox Marxist's labeled Fascism and Nazism as a heresy of Marxism) but it is still socialism.
Just because it is named 'socialist' doesn't mean that National Socialism has anything to do with Socialism. - And Mussolini had abandoned Marxism when he founded Fascism in Italy... they are very, very different, as I have pointed out. Heck I am a liberal - but you will quickly point out 'liberal' has taken on a different meaning from the past.

You mean like in the U.S.S.R.? Oh wait, that was a top-down revolt too. :rolleyes:

Oh, here you would like us to believe that the USSR was socialist - wrong. Leninist Communism. They might have held signs with Marx on them, but they were very far removed from a Marxist socialist state.

Prior to WWII, both Italian and German politics had been dominated by socialism for decades. What Mussolini and Hitler both did was promise a new type of socialism that fed off of popular sentiment at the time (populism in Italy and Nationalism in Germany). To say there was not a lot of "socialistic thought" is to be either ignorant of history of willfully dishonest. Both would be in character for you.

They promised a political system framed in a way that wouldn't be offensive to the people. The people were comfortable with socialism, so you just say - sure, it is socialism, just a little different... Not only was it a 'little' different, it was an entirely different type of political system, that is why we have new names for them Shag – I thought you were all about the ‘name’…

You are again trying to misrepresent socialism as an economic system. I have said it before, it is FIRST a theory of social causation. From that the ideology is derived and from the ideology the economic approach is derived.

So you think a system (fascism or Nazism) which promoted class, demoralized the working man, gave all the wealth to the industrial owners or the state, gave no welfare to the poor, weak, and infirm, was nationalist, was militaristic, was like socialism?
That doesn't in any way negate the fact that Fascism is socialism.

It sure does shag – because the only tie with socialism that fascism has is the crossing of economic development – when socialism has to have either complete business or government control of the economy. Fascism has that. However Socialism then moves to the workers controlling the means of production, the economy, fascism nor nazism ever gets to that point. It wouldn’t work.

Unless you can show that Fascism (and/or National Socialism) is not aimed at achieving social justice through collectivist means, your argument is nothing but misdirection and deception.

I just did – there is no social justice, by any definition, in fascism and or Nazism. The poor are eliminated, not though creating means to help them – or even to take from the rich to give to the poor (a collective means). They are killed or ignored. There are class systems put into place that make sure that the working class will remain in a powerless position, with no means of advancement. Social justice - even by your definition includes (and this is straight from Rawls, who you quote as the 'expert' on this subject):

Freedom of thought;
Liberty of conscience as it affects social relationships on the grounds of religion, philosophy, and morality;
Political liberties (e.g. representative democratic institutions, freedom of speech and the press, and freedom of assembly);
Freedom of association;
Freedoms necessary for the liberty and integrity of the person (viz: freedom from slavery, freedom of movement and a reasonable degree of freedom to choose one's occupation); and
Rights and liberties covered by the rule of law.​

Does any of that sound like fascism or nazism?

The whole idea of socialism is to create equality and complete liberty, yes at some point state driven equality – which than evolves to populace driven equality. The whole idea behind both fascism, and especially Nazism is to create a disparity between classes, as well as between nationalities or race or religious beliefs. Socialism doesn’t vilify the poor, fascism and Nazism do. Socialism doesn’t kill the Jews, Nazism does. But no where does socialism involve removal of things like freedom of the press, freedom of association nor does it involve denying liberties because of race, creed, sex. Fascism and Nazism is all about removal of freedom of the press, freedom of association. And as far as denying liberties because of race or creed or national origin or sex or age or ability, I think the record of Nazi Germany on this point doesn't need to be rehashed, I think you know the answer to that Shag.

They are not at all similar except for one point in their economic development.

Continue to LIE about National Socialism (Nazism) and Facism all you want. There are plenty on this forum who know a lot more then you on these things and will gladly point out your lies.

Marginalize yourself all you want.

I am not lying – I have placed all the points where fascism/Nazism are different than socialism, and there are many, many of them. You can only point to the fact that the ‘formal’ name of the nazi party had the world socialism, that the leaders thought that the best way to get the people on their side and vote them in was to lie and tell the people it was just a different kind of socialist party, and that at one point they cross economically.

And social justice - Fascism and Nazism are about as far removed from any definition of social justice that you can come up with - even in that ivory tower of yours.... And speaking of that ivory tower....

Yes shag – you know so much more than I do – I am so glad that I have an ‘almost’ college graduate that is willing to take his time to show me the errors of my ways –

God, can you get any more elitist shag?

Lets start with original thought - now you steal 'marginalize'? Come on, you can do better than that...
__________________

Cal - I think I caught most of your points in this - if not, you might want to point them out - we seem to have been writing at the same time...

However I did catch this...
And the class distinctions you speak of are the result of political corruption, not design.

no -

One of the major characteristics of a fascist country is separation and rejecting equality to a specific group of the population based on some superficial qualities and beliefs. Based on the origin, creed or race, a fascist government always considered one class of citizens as superior to another. The superior class lives in a republic whereas the oppressed class lives in a fascist state.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top