joegr
Dedicated LVC Member
I think mines was made the ending of 2003.
You're still good (tensioner wise).
I think mines was made the ending of 2003.
Yes I am if that's the problem. I have to see how much work is involved and price of parts. If I am not mistaken their are 4 tensioners
Yes I am if that's the problem. I have to see how much work is involved and price of parts. If I am not mistaken their are 4 tensioners
Pull the valve covers first and see what the problem actually is first. It could be the tensioners, but with your gen II engine, I think that the odds are it is something more serious.
2004, probably not. The timing chain tensioner issues are usually pre 2003.
You may find that you have a cam moving in a direction that it is not supposed to.
Joe and others,
a couple years back I found a thread on LVC where a guy was experiencing a rattle in his 3.9. He pulled the valve covers,,, loosened his cam bearing caps,,, and shifted them to prevent the longitudinal movement. During the process... he took a few pics. One of the pics showed what appeard to be a thick thrust washer under the rear bearing cap at the rear of the cams. His was split in 2. Not sure if it was designed that way, (doubt it), and it was hard to tell from the pic if it was cracked.
- - - Mike - - -
Joe and others,
My engine rattles on startup after sitting for more than 24 hours in moderate to warm temps,,, and after 8 hours in cold weather.
- - - Mike - - -
... Can the oil pump be replaced with the engine in the car?
Yes, but I see no reason to suspect it as the problem. The oil pump is very hard to impossible to get as a new part for some years.
Don't the symptoms align with a leaking oil pump pressure relief valve? If I shut my 03 off and start it back up, no rattle. If I let it sit, now for even a short time, get a rattle on startup. If I pull the fuel pump fuse and crank the motor for 5 seconds, even if it's sat for days, no rattle when I replace the fuse and start it up.
It's been a long time since I've checked in on this thread - and still no one has been able to solve it. How crazy.
Yeah...
Interesting that the first year for the 3V 5.4 with cam phasers... is the same year the LS got a HP increase with VVT/VCT,,, using cam phasers.
Ford sold the LS short from what it "could have been".... but if people could have bought a 4 door version of a Mustang,,, it may have undercut Mustang sales to a point. So it was partially a "marketing" thing by Ford... but also the fact that they took a "prestamped" version of a Jaguar,,, changed the sheetmetal and put a Ford badge on it.
The following is slightly off topic... but still on topic to a degree.
Had Ford wanted to make a "true" Sport or Ultimate version of the LS... they would have taken a current, (at the time from 2003-2005), all aluminum version of the 4.6, and stuffed it down in the LS. 302HP and 318 LB Ft. of torque,,, From a 4V NON VVT/VCT ENGINE!!! All they would have had to do is re-spring and re-strut the front suspension,,, and re-form the sheet metal around the strut towers,,, and a stiffer front swaybar.
Now if that isn't enough... think about the mods that can be done to a 4.6,,, that can't easily be done to the 3.9. All we have is the exhaust, CAI, and a re-program. The 4.6 has cams and throttle body,,, plus the standard LS upgrades. McClaren was on the right track with their prototype,,, but they stayed within the confines that Ford gave them.
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/mclaren-performance-lincoln-ls-auto-shows
A 4.6 version of the LS,,, could have easily tied or bested the supercharged McClaen version. Plus... the torque of the 4.6 would have given it a lower "power band",,, which should mean better gas milage.
For those wondering about the limitations of the 5r55s tranny,,, keep in mind that the same tranny has been used in Mustang GT's for years since LS production has stopped. Something else. Lincoln has always been the innovative side of FMC. Many Lincoln designs,,, are prototypical of what will follow in Ford products. What works... stays in production. What doesn't... is redesigned. Most of what is found in 10 year old LS's... is still in production today,,, with further improvements.
There is a reason Ford bought Jaguar. For design and technology improvements,,, while being able to bypass leagal copyright issues. Part of the increase in price for a Lincoln,,, is paying for R&D. That's why the LS cost 40G+ when it was in production. Cadillac and Chrysler did it for years too,,, and still are. So are Lexus and Infinity.
This has been going on for years. Chrysler built the first Hemi engine in 1964,,, and that sent them to the front in Nascar. Ford responded by designing their own experimental Hemi version of a 484 DOHC engine in the late 60's,,, but it never went into production. Obviously... it was a Hemi copy,,, but with further design improvements. Have fun finding info on it. The only reason I know about it,,, is from a high school autoshop book.
Nuff said at this point.
Too bad the 4.6L didn't fit from the bottom. Too bad even the Ford engineers that did stuff one in the LS couldn't solve the cooling issue.
I really feel like it either must have not been a huge priority, or didn't have the proper time to try to fix (unless those engineers had a small coolant leak and also didn't believe that they needed to change ALL the plastic parts LOL) because the mod motor should have used its own water pump which wouldn't have any problems moving enough water for its own engine. or of the problem was that the flowing water wasn't getting cooled enough, then they could have just put a bigger radiator in it (cough cough cobra cough). I mean how hard could they have really tried to solve the problem, they were probably more trying to figure out the nightmare that is a motor swap in an LS and getting all the computers to play nice in the sandbox...
I'm telling you, if they have modified the body just a bit to make it actually fit, the LS would have been an entirely different monster, the best sport lincolns have shared mustang parts! the LS being the first after a long while to separate from this is one of the main issues of unreliability (not saying that the car isn't reliable, just talking about what the car has for reliability issues), causes it to be more costly, and is definitely responsible for its mediocre performance compared to some of its competition.
could have actually made the LSE something special, even if only in limited numbers, for the 1st gen they could have used a standard aluminator, then the timing of the 2nd gen would have been perfect to have a terminator powered LS backed by a tremec, probably would have been able to keep up with the big dog caddies AMGs and Ms...