How do you feel about Biden NOW?

TheDude said:
America isn't the only country with guns, let alone a lot of guns. Yet look at own gun violence numbers compared to other "first nations". Facts can be so pesky.
Click to expand...
Yup. That because other "first nations" have already stripped gun rights away from their citizens!!! Which includes most of Europe.

Bite Me!!!
 
TheDude said:
Then maybe we shouldn't make hasty judgments and quick conclusions based on the city live? Just saying, my man.

California isn't actually sliding towards socialism nor decay. That's Rightwing news fear mongering.

I couldn't care less that you dislike or even hate Newsom, you're free to think that. But it's weird you attack Newsom for being an "elitist", yet you'd vote for Trump, who is as elitist as they come, he's been a New York millionaire, then billionaire for most of his adult life.

Then there's the fact that you'd be voting for Trump again after he tried to overturn a legal and fair election, illegally pressured state election officials, when that failed, he staged a literal insurrection, attack on our Capital and failed coup via his domestic terrorist acolytes. Just nutty to hand-wave away literal treason.
Click to expand...
It is no hasty judgement! I have seen the utter squalor of the homeless camps that Cali's self proclaimed "Homeless Czar" has failed to mitigate. He now says that the goal, since he failed to solve, was, in his words "aspirational". He ignores the bullet train fiasco, just keeps pumping money to his cronies who are running it. The state is losing population, has already lost 1 congressional seat. He locked down this state for COVID, closed the schools, yet sent his own kids away to a private boarding school. French Laundry, etc, etc- the list goes on and on. I'll bet you live in Marin County, just like Gavin, which was granted a waiver from the state mandated affordable housing quotas. as for my Trump statement- if the choice came down to either Trump or Biden (or any other Lib Dimmocrat) then yeah I would vote for him. I would like the policies but prefer not to have his daily drama. I don't condone what happened on Jan 6, but I don't think it would qualify as a domestic terrorist attack. I wonder how many FBI undercover agents were in that mob? Funny, they will not answer that question when asked. Yes, it was illegal and punishment for the offenders is deserved, but it was not a terrorist attack. I am actually hoping to have an alternative from the republican party emerge. Hopefully that will happen. Arizona is trying to kill the ability of a third party group (No labels Party) from getting status to be on the ballot in 2024- They (Dem Gov Hobbs) fears that they will siphon votes off from Biden.
 
I was talking about judging me solely form where I live :)

I do agree California has a huge homeless problem. It's also made worse by the fact that Red States/cities literally bus their homeless over here.

California losing population isn't necessarily a bad thing, considering our drought problems.

You know I live in Marin County, as my location is listed...

Jan 6th by definition was a domestic terrorist attack. FBI Definition: "Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature." -Terrorism | Federal Bureau of Investigation



Trump losing the Republican nomionation and running in his own party as he's said he would is the the greater threat to any Republican candidate in 2024. In fact, one of the items the RNC is planning to push in the Republican primary debates come next year is to have all candidates pledge that they will not run 3rd party if they lose the nomination. This of course is 99.99% directed at Trump.

GOP primary candidates must agree to loyalty pledge in order to debate, RNC chair says

I am very confident Trump will likely not get the nomination and I am very confident he will run 3rd party so he can keep fleecing his cult. He's a conman above all else after all.
 
Last edited:
04_Sport_LS said:
Anyone notice the requirement to be evaluated by a psychiatrist/psycologist???

That sounds like an automatic fail to me.

I have a better idea. It's called the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory test. It's required to work in Nuke plants.

Years ago it was 500 questions, (with about 50 major "red flag" questions. Last time I took it... it had been reduced to 300.

It will definitely filter out the "disturbed" people from the rest.

Personally.... the first people I would like to see take the test... is Biden, Harris... and Pelosi. ESPECIALLY Pelosi !!!

"The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a psychological test that assesses personality traits and psychopathology. It is primarily intended to test people who are suspected of having mental health or other clinical issues."
Click to expand...
Trump would definitely fail that test!
 
Maybe... maybe not. We probably will never know.

The first time I took it, (in my early 20's), there was a very demure middle aged woman that did fail. She was never seen again on the jobsite.

The test does work.

You think Trump would fail. I think Pelosi would fail.

But neither would take the test... because both would think they are above having to take the test. I can almost gaurantee Pelosi would refuse. Trump might go for it though. What then if he passed???
 
So "Dude" .... you never did answer my question about how many "alternate dwelling units" you have on your property.

How much is the government paying you to house migrants or homeless people???
Screenshot_20230404-101513.png
 

Déjà Vu: ADU’s Are a Dangerous Fraud

CityWatch is published 24/7 with special e-news blasts on Monday and Thursday evening, with Extras as appropriate around special events such as elections or important issues. Share it with your Neighborhood Council and other activists.
www.citywatchla.com www.citywatchla.com
 
TheDude said:
I don't find the idea of hunting to be a fun activity, but I don't have a problem with legal hunting. But if I ever got the itch to kill a defenseless animal for sport, I'd use a bow, like a real man.
Click to expand...

LOL... if you search Youtube videos... you will find some where the deer kicked the hunters butt.

The state I live in has some pretty strong restrictions for deer hunting. Minimum diameter caliber is .357... and all cartridges have to be "straight walled"... so that excludes most rifle calibers. There are a couple of exceptions that allow high power bolt action rifles.

On top of that... while an AR-15 can be used to hunt deer... a hunter is limited to 3 rounds in the magazine.

The other option is using a shotgun (and slugs), but once again the hunter is restricted to 3 rounds.

The only time a hunter is allowed more than 3 rounds... is for handgun hunting (think revolver).

So no one here is blasting away deer with 20 or 30 rounds.

Once again... you are ignorant.

IMG_20230404_235118619.jpg



Came home late last night..
and found 5 deer in my yard.

They are chewing my fruit trees down to twigs.

So I am probably going to file for a nuisance permit with the local DNR.
 
Then there's this... also known as "zombie deer". The deer may need to be tested, to see if the deer is safe for consumption.

On top of that Tuberculosis (Bovine TB) has been found in deer in a neighboring state.

Supposedly the meat is safe to consume if well cooked... but the big concern is the deer transmitting the TB to other livestock.

Screenshot_20230405-150500.png
 
04_Sport_LS said:
LOL... if you search Youtube videos... you will find some where the deer kicked the hunters butt.

The state I live in has some pretty strong restrictions for deer hunting. Minimum diameter caliber is .357... and all cartridges have to be "straight walled"... so that excludes most rifle calibers. There are a couple of exceptions that allow high power bolt action rifles.

On top of that... while an AR-15 can be used to hunt deer... a hunter is limited to 3 rounds in the magazine.

The other option is using a shotgun (and slugs), but once again the hunter is restricted to 3 rounds.

The only time a hunter is allowed more than 3 rounds... is for handgun hunting (think revolver).

So no one here is blasting away deer with 20 or 30 rounds.

Once again... you are ignorant.

View attachment 828577638


Came home late last night..
and found 5 deer in my yard.

They are chewing my fruit trees down to twigs.

So I am probably going to file for a nuisance permit with the local DNR.
Click to expand...

Probably Trumpers getting their asses kicked by deer.

Strawman much? I made no comments on hunting and what can or can't be used. I said that a) I'm not interested in hunting b) that I don't have a problem with legal hunting and c) if I were to hunt for sport, I'd use a bow, like a real man.

As far you killing a bunch of defenseless hungry animals in your yard, seems you'll be doing it legally, so have fun I guess.
 
TheDude said:
As far you killing a bunch of defenseless hungry animals in your yard, seems you'll be doing it legally, so have fun I guess.
Click to expand...

You seem to miss (or ignore) the point I made... that these deer could infect farmers livestock... especially goats, since they are a similar (related) species.

But as a typical "Lib"... once again you are clueless.

I wish I had the means to ship a few thousand deer to Cali. Not only would they decimate the foliage, but would also probably infect some deer related species.

THEN you would find out the nuisance they can be.
 
I'm as much of a wildlife/nature lover as anyone. I don't hunt, but I'm not anti-hunter, as long as they are doing it correctly. I very much appreciate the need for population control on deer. They can get out hand very quickly, and cause lots of trouble and destruction, and that's the healthy ones. We have a pretty bad outbreak of CWD here, so more than ever, we need the herds thinned out. We also have a big problem going with feral pigs, and hunters are encouraged to kill all that they find. Again, this is very much needed to be done.
 
04_Sport_LS said:
You seem to miss (or ignore) the point I made... that these deer could infect farmers livestock... especially goats, since they are a similar (related) species.

But as a typical "Lib"... once again you are clueless.

I wish I had the means to ship a few thousand deer to Cali. Not only would they decimate the foliage, but would also probably infect some deer related species.

THEN you would find out the nuisance they can be.
Click to expand...

I've literally said I have no problem with legal hunting multiple times now.

Okay if I say something like "As a typical Con, you have reading comprehension issues"?

We have plenty of deer here, thanks. Enjoy your blasting away at Bambi.
 
04_Sport_LS said:
Yup. That because other "first nations" have already stripped gun rights away from their citizens!!! Which includes most of Europe.

Bite Me!!!
Click to expand...

That sounds a lot like a pro gun regulation argument. Because if it worked for them, it can work for America :)

Unless you think America isn't the best?
 
I think this country is a former shadow of itself.

It's a sad day when a President allows spy balloons to gather data on this country, instead of shooting them down.

I could list a number of former Presidents... that would not have tolerated that.
 
The 60's were a major
(not for the better) "turning point".

Only an idiot would not see that the "new world order" is coming fast.

This country has always had the means (and right) to defend itself... by a citizen army... if necessary.

Without the 2nd Amendment... this country would be under the control of England today.

If that had happened... we would be subjects, instead of citizens.
 
During WW2... Emperor Yamamoto knew better than to try to invade the United States.

He is often quoted as saying... "behind every blade of grass, is an Amercan with a gun".
 
04_Sport_LS said:
I think this country is a former shadow of itself.

It's a sad day when a President allows spy balloons to gather data on this country, instead of shooting them down.

I could list a number of former Presidents... that would not have tolerated that.
Click to expand...

Maybe you didn't get the memo? But those balloons were shot down once it was safe to do so and had a more likely chance of being recovered, for counter intelligence purposes.

You Trumpers love to skew reality. So odd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 74 (members: 0, guests: 74)
Back
Top